BUSH IS SWINE

2009-08-17T17:21:00.000-07:00

The DIRECT Vehicles

We need a cheap ride; inexpensive space access using many existing components, spending the big money on the ‘black hole’ space propulsion system emergent w/ the collider on the Franco-Swiss border.

You ultimately will bring us in on this grand space adventure with a low cost gov’t-backed health care option. I cannot make Senators stop the increasingly transparent lying, but they should admit they **** us - actually ‘****ing us into the future’ by gaming in the CIA-orchestrated monopoly capitalism. Howard Dean would have been the man for Health and Human Services; he is a supporter and not a stepping stone.

George Allen isn't going to push it for you. Neither will Conrad Burns or Larry Craig, but it would have been possible to structure a viable low cost government-backed health care option around governors like Allen and administrators like Larry Craig - who was big in the VA - being efficient in implementation.

Now - having bagged all those guys out - it will be pretty funny if the Democrats come up empty handed or talking big without there being any real gains on the bottom line for the middle class.

It is a known fact that liberals in a herd develop a type of 'feeding frenzy' that makes them collectively more liberal than they ever would have been on their own - a plague in upper level education. Do groups of conservatives tend to be similarly more conservative than individuals? No idea, but the bottom line is that Richard Nixon, who may or may not have invented the HMO depending on who you talk to, would nonetheless have gotten us a low cost government-backed health care option years ago.

Toilet-to-tap: Is your kid drinking sewage? Word on the streets is that at least in New York they are; it literally comes out of the sewer and goes into the Nestle bottler after a seven stage purification process. In New York.... which is right on the Hudson River? How can that be? Why don't they purify the Hudson River water? Because - and this is only my theory about how they set up to make the New Yorkers literally drink treated sewage - years ago the government told IBM it would be okay to dispose of microscopic or anyway very small plastic nodules which were suppose to be harmless slash inert in the Hudson. And I suspect they did that knowing they can't clean the plastic out of the water but are making IBM leap through hoops cleaning the plastic out of the river..... which is a big scam the very top dogs at IBM were probably [almost certainly] in on the whole time though management is supposedly up in arms over it. What swine these 'big business men-on-the-fixed-tit' really are. Microsoft is said to be a CIA mechanism in its entirety; the Tuskegee Blood Experiment which started in the late 1920s before the CIA was even formed appears to have been incorporated into the MKULTRA overview designator as Subproject 24 circa early 1950s; and its worth asking if IBM was similarly a CIA creation before the Agency was formally chartered, including the work for the Zionists running the Holocaust in return for modern Israel. Swine.

They're making your kid drink sewer water? Ascorbic acid and high fructose corn syrup at least 'in' and in some cases dominating the food chain? The low cost government-backed health care option now!

2009-06-24T10:23:00.000-07:00

Letter to the Hon. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
[Copy to the United States Senate]

January 3, 2006

The Hon. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Prettyman Court House
Washington D.C. 20001

Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and agency surveillance evading judicial review

Dear Judge Kotelly,

Knowing J. Skelly Wright kept unsolicited correspondence in his files - now available for perusal in the Library of Congress - I am hopeful you will also consider points of view not otherwise brought formally to your attention. Immediately I react to a Washington Post story - Judges on Surveillance Court To Be Briefed on Spy Program, Carol D. Leonnig and Dafna Linzer, Dec 22 2005, page A1 - which says the National Security Agency has conducted surveillance activities not authorized by any court, alleging 'the agencies' have collaborated in much broader violations of civil rights than the media suggests, those invidious activities have proven contagious among and between the agencies and their foreign counterparts, and it will not be possible to significantly address the 'erosion' of civil rights which that activity represents on a superficial basis. I also claim the CIA has undertaken a broad attack upon the judiciary and Supreme Court, and it is similarly not possible to isolate that effect from broader patterns of agency behavior.

I cite to two cases in the District of Columbia district, and I was not involved in either one at the District Court level:
Bilyeu v. Clinton et al. 1:00-cv-02290 RWR which became Bilyeu v. Federal Government 1:01-cv-00321 RWR appeal 02-5008 denied,
and Gloria Hicks v. National Security Agency (NSA) 04-cv-01586 GK appeal 04-5362 denied.
Both allege torture from remote locations using electromagnetic radiation and implantation with invasive medical technologies.

As you presumably know but typical pro se litigants don't, those allegations are preclusionary under the bastard Best v. Kelley 39 F.3d 328 (D.C.Cir 1994) footnote reference at 330 to Wilson v. United States Federal Government, Civ. Action No. 92-2159 (D.D.C. 1992)['1992' underlined in original]. Without at all examining the technologies, both courts effectively said it wasn't possible to litigate egregious activity undertaken by government agencies without media coverage, effectively subjugating the victims, the press, and whatever reform efforts may exist in the judiciary and in the agencies. Hon. James Robertson apparently resigned from the panel in response to the recent relevations - a shame; he was probably one of the reform elements.
[Short line here gave the appearence of a paragragh break in the copies to the Senate]

I go so far as to claim the 1994 ruling in Best relates [intentionally or otherwise] to the 'firewall' Jamie Gorelick established between the CIA and the FBI, which in turn fueled the so-called 'Patriot Act' in the post-9/11 environment - in other words, that ruling would have eroded civil liberties even if what the NSA is currently accused of had been authorized by the courts which it wasn't - but the really important thing Bilyeu and Hicks illustrate is the virtually LIMITLESS resources government agencies and those acting in the guise of government authority bring to invidious activity when they decide to do it. Bilyeu has been ongoing now for 'over a decade' [underlined in original] of intense, iterative, live - at times physically painful, always humiliating and disgraceful - surveillance, and Hicks for 'five years' [underlined] of shear hell. The courts won't hear either one, and both were [are] courageous women who physically fought to get into and through the court process as best they could. Not only have they been abandoned by the judiciary but they are shunned by the legislative branch never mind media - what is to be their recourse?
[Short line here gave the appearence of a paragragh break in the copies to the Senate]

Post says you've asked for a briefing by the agencies. Suppose they blandly deny or attempt to diminish the unauthorized activity. I believe a particular individual associated with the CIA - Peter Bourne - to be a pivotal type of person in looking at both the authorized and unauthorized activities of government agencies [implanting Dennis Sweeney in 1970, Jimmy Carter probably the latter part of 1978 TOTALLY UNAUTHORIZED and thusly undermining Carter in the 1980 campaign, visiting with Saddam Hussein in Baghdad 1995, escorting Carter to get the Nobel Peace Prize very likely at the behest of the CIA was that 2003]. NSA will try to say that's CIA and not them but that isn't true - Hicks appears to be NSA while Bilyeu looks like CIA. Actually, you probably have a better feel for that than I.

As director of the CIA, George H.W. Bush broke the Furman moratorium on capital punishment with Gary Gilmore in Utah - recently expanded to Connecticut [Ross in May 2005] and headed for Vermont [Fell sentenced in roughly the same time period - June 2005]. If Chief Justice Rehnquist was implanted with a neuroprosthetic my guess is they used it to kill him. Is Justice Stevens implanted? Finally the courts are being physically attacked, and it is difficult to separate that from agency surveillance activities. Yours etc., Andrew Bestor

[Copies to the Senate were distributed early morning with the official letter to Kollar-Kotelly hand delivered about 10:30 a.m.]

2009-04-01T14:34:00.000-07:00

Does Somebody Whose Little Boy Suffers Induced Autism 'Deliberately Inflicted by the United States Government but Currently Unaddressed' Profit in the Prosecution of Torture, or Suffer Further Inhibition and Prolonged Denial:

The Deification of Obama and Its Impact on The Rest Of Us

Why they wanted torture incorporated into the American judicial process is much more important than which acts of torture were used; a lawyer and professor in constitutional law isn't seeing that? Of course Obama does, but his virtue leads to a dance with public awareness that in itself is hugely deceptive though he does it well and clearly enjoys it.This 'torture debate' and vindictive inquiry ignores the fact the torture here, while unfortunate, certainly isn't close to being the worst thing our government has done in the modern era [versus abandoning our own POWs in Southeast Asia and using some of them on Con Son in development of the AIDS virus for example]. Talk about prosecutions hugely inhibits release of further documentation here and makes progress from torture into abandonment or medical testing including at Dulce difficult if not impossible.
Unfortunately, it is possible that is exactly why he's doing it.

The significance of Obama's decision to release the torture memos, Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com, Friday April 17, 2009.
Numerous commentators are objecting to the idea that Barack Obama deserves credit for his release of the OLC torture memos yesterday in light of his accompanying pledge that CIA officials relying in good faith on those memos won't be prosecuted. Chris Floyd is one who articulates that objection quite well and, as is always true for Chris, his criticisms are well worth reading. Many others -- including Keith Olbermann, Jonathan Turley, John Dean [took down Nixon and opened the door to the attacks on the presidency, including Carter being twice drugged and kidnapped out of the White House and the Secret Service shooting Reagan in the car] and Bruce Fein -- yesterday lambasted Obama for his anti-prosecution stance. Since I gave substantial credit to Obama yesterday for the release of the memos and believe even more so today that he deserves it (despite finding the anti-prosecution case as corrupted and morally bankrupt as ever), I want to return to the issue of Obama's actions.

Purely as an analytical matter, releasing the OLC memos and advocating against prosecutions are two separate acts. It's perfectly coherent to praise one and condemn the other.
[I support release, but of documentation going considerably farther then the torture memos; speak of medical records from Dulce, New Mexico, for instance. Those essentially are government property used by private interests in revenue schemes which continue to drive markets and health care. The basic premise of the situation being that people were kidnapped, experimented on, and ultimately killed, you aren't going to get any records if you threaten prosecutions and this sideshow over torture creates a hugely problematic blockage to release of anything].
There is an unhealthy tendency to want to make categorical, absolute judgments about the persona of politicians generally and Obama especially ("I like him"/"I don't like him"; "I trust him/I don't trust him") rather than case-by-case judgments about his specific acts. "Like" and "trust" are sentiments appropriate for one's friends and loved ones, not political leaders. A politician who does something horrible yesterday can do something praiseworthy tomorrow. Generally bad people can do good things (even if for ignoble reasons) and generally good people can do bad things. That's why I care little about motives, which I think, in any event, are impossible to know. Regardless of motives, good acts (releasing the torture memos) should be praised, and bad acts (arguing against prosecutions) should be condemned.

Beyond those generalities, I think the significance of Obama's decision to release those memos -- and the political courage it took -- shouldn't be minimized. There is no question that many key factions in the "intelligence community" were vehemently opposed to release of those memos. I have no doubt that reports that they waged a "war" to prevent release of these memos were absolutely true. The disgusting comments of former CIA Director Mike Hayden on MSNBC yesterday -- where he made clear that he simply does not believe in the right of citizens to know what their government does and that government crimes should be kept hidden-- is clearly what Obama was hearing from many powerful circles. That twisted anti-democratic mentality is the one that predominates in our political class.

In the United States, what Obama did yesterday is simply not done.
[Here Greenwald goes too far, because it has happened in the MKULTRA death of Frank Olsen for example and widespread LSD testing on people and in Bill Clinton's 'apology for Muskegee' which again were all adjudicated disinformation scenarios. Ironically, in pushing for prosecutions author Greenwald essentially condones this outcome; I would only prosecute those who have not released documentation].
American Presidents do not disseminate to the world documents which narrate in vivid, elaborate detail the dirty, illegal deeds done by the CIA, especially not when the actions are very recent, were approved and ordered by the President of the United States, and the CIA is aggressively demanding that the documents remain concealed and claiming that their release will harm national security. When is the last time a President did that?.... [end citation]

Summarized, blocking release of documentation - or viewed the other way, withholding the documentation from the public - is a huge problem,
but it is only one aspect of a larger control function which this supposedly democratic government is assuming, in part driven by commerical interests backed by the CIA. Please OPPOSE the blatantly unconstitutional 'Endless Copyright' regime. I support the pirates on ANYTHING over fifteen years tops; more realistically half that. A compromise position of seven years, six months.

Hollywood scores win over Pirate Bay, 4 convicted, LOUISE NORDSTROM, Associated Press Writer, Fri Apr 17, 2009. STOCKHOLM - The entertainment industry won round one Friday in a legal battle against file-sharing hub The Pirate Bay, with guilty verdicts and one-year prison sentences handed down to four men accused of running and financing the popular site.

The defendants vowed to appeal, setting the stage for a lengthy copyright dispute between music and movie corporations and an online swap shop they say has deprived them of billions of dollars in lost revenue.

In its landmark ruling, the Stockholm district court convicted Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, Peter Sunde, Fredrik Neij and Carl Lundstrom of helping millions of users illegally download music, movies and computer games.

"We can't pay and we won't pay," Sunde said in a defiant video clip posted on the Internet. Mockingly, he held up a hand-scribbled "I owe U" note to the camera. "This is as close as you will get to having money from us," Sunde said.

Lundstrom helped finance the site while the three other defendants administered it.

The case focused on dozens of works that the prosecutor said were downloaded illegally. They included songs by the Beatles [including the LONG DEAD ones]...

John Kennedy, the head of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, called the verdict good news for anyone "who is making a living or a business from creative activity and who needs to know their rights will be protected by law."

NOTE: That is certainly not the Beatles, half of whom are dead!!!
D-E-A-D. No living or creating involved [other than parasites essentially refinancing the past glory of others][end note].

The Pirate Bay had assured users the trial wouldn't affect the site, and it remained operational after the verdict. Authorities temporarily shut it down in May 2006 after seizing servers and computer equipment during raids in several locations in Sweden. But it soon reappeared, running on servers elsewhere.

Andre Rickardsson, a computer expert and former investigator for the Swedish security police, said the ruling could encourage the entertainment industry to threaten Internet operators with lawsuits unless they block access to the site.

File-sharing wouldn't go away, he added, but users would likely turn to more advanced technological tools to hide their activities.

"It's not as if people will turn around and say 'oops, I'll have to stop file-sharing now.' Instead the reaction will be 'oops, what can I do to protect myself from getting caught'."

Sunde's lawyer Peter Althin said he was confident that higher courts would dismiss the case against The Pirate Bay, which he described as a battle between the corporate world and "a generation of young people who want to take part of new technology."

The verdict comes as Europe debates stricter rules to crack down on those who share content illegally on the Internet.

Last week French legislators rejected a plan [VIVA LA FRANCE!, VIVA LA FRANCE!] to cut off the Internet connections of people who illegally download music and films, but the government plans to resurrect the bill for another vote this month.

Opponents said the legislation would represent a Big Brother intrusion on civil liberties, while the European Parliament last month adopted a nonbinding resolution that defines Internet access as an untouchable "fundamental freedom."

Earlier this month, Sweden introduced a new law that makes it easier to prosecute file-sharers because it requires Internet Service Providers to disclose the Internet Protocol-addresses of suspected violators to copyright owners.

The country of 9 million has one of Europe's highest rates of Internet penetration, but has also gained a reputation as a hub for file-sharers.

Statistics from the Netnod Internet Exchange, an organization measuring Internet traffic in Sweden, suggested that daily online activity dropped more than 40 percent after the law took effect on April 1 [END].

I never thought I would find myself saying this, but THANK GOD for the wise men and women in the European Parliament who have struck the first decisive blows against the mindlessly draconian CIA 'endless copyright' regime. This is the territory where we find a sharp break between New Hampshire Libertarians saying 'don't tread on me', and establishment Republicans who are really nothing more than tools of big business. There are still other frontiers to push; we love Europe on reduction of the mindless copyright regime, but hate and fear Europe over their confiscation of guns. What are we doing about that? What active steps are we taking?

Would it be possible to send two year gift subscriptions of American Rifleman to scattered barbershops across Europe - Ireland through Poland - and have customers discretely check to see if they were being made available in the seating areas?

Gun control....via ammunition control[?]. What bogusness is this? Ammo hard to get; Local gun dealers at a loss to explain shortage of bullets, Mark LaFlame, Sun Journal, 008 Apr 2009. CIA swine.

Two - conceptually unrelated - gunmen undertake slaughter in the American northeast, within twenty four hours of each other [03~04 Apr 2009].... BOTH wearing body armor/bullet-proof vests? 'Coincidental similar attack of unrelated lone gunmen'? Richard Poplawski [Pittsburgh] feared they're about to outlaw guns... so he started shooting; Jiverly Wong [Binghampton NY] took out even more people in a immigrant aid center.
CIA. Obama and I guess Holder must really be wanting to confiscate guns... and somebody isn't shy about paving the way for them. It isn't real subtle, is it?

The following story also ignores the possibility of CIA affiliation - and there might not be any - but 'the inside line' is too rarely suggested for me to ignore this. We do not usually get grainy black and white surveillance video footage from anything above a package store robbery, while this is the 'action photograph' of a fixer.

McLean Firm Was Target Of Alleged Extortion Try, David S. Hilzenrath, Washington Post, 17 Aug 2005. In May 2004, JER Partners, a McLean-based real estate firm headed by local philanthropist Joseph E. Robert Jr., was pursuing an $85 million investment from an Illinois pension fund when a fax arrived from the Turks and Caicos Islands.

The document requested an $850,000 finder's fee for a consulting firm that had not done any work for JER.

The next day, a Chicago attorney was on the phone warning that unless JER signed the agreement, it would lose the pension fund deal, according to court papers on file in Illinois.

The Chicago attorney, who had been a top fundraiser for the Democratic Party, said, according to court papers, "that this was how things are done in Illinois."

JER didn't sign -- and was still awarded the $85 million pension fund investment. But the episode nevertheless has the potential to make JER a key player in the prosecution of an alleged extortion scheme that is casting light on the role of politically connected intermediaries who help private money management firms court investments from public pension funds.

The Justice Department says it is investigating business practices at Illinois state boards, and it recently obtained indictments against two people in connection with the alleged attempt to extort money from JER. The Chicago lawyer who is alleged to have made the calls, Joseph Cari, has agreed to plead guilty and is cooperating with the government, according to his lawyer, Scott R. Lassar.

Cari served as one of the Democratic National Committee's finance chairmen during the 2000 elections and previously was finance chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Stuart Levine, who was a member of the pension fund board at the time of the alleged shakedown and is accused of attempting to extort kickbacks from multiple firms, has pleaded not guilty, said his attorney, Marc W. Martin.

Martin declined to comment further.

JER spokesman Franz Paasche said the company "refused to participate in an improper course of conduct" and has been cooperating with an investigation by the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. Paasche added that the McLean firm "is not under investigation."

The JER spokesman would not say whether the firm alerted law enforcement to the alleged extortion attempt, and spokesmen for the FBI and the U.S. attorney in Chicago also declined to say.

Robert, a former amateur boxer, is a prominent member of the Washington business community. With his friend James V. Kimsey, co- founder and former chairman of America Online Inc., Robert traveled into the mountains of Colombia several years ago to try to persuade Marxist rebels to drop their guerrilla war and stop trafficking in drugs. When a stranger got aggressive with his wife at an Adams- Morgan nightclub in 2000, Robert interceded, blocking a punch and landing one of his own, as recounted in The Post's Reliable Source column.

In a statement provided by his office, Kimsey said he had no firsthand knowledge of the pension fund episode but said, "I have known Joe Robert for years, and I know he would never ever cave to this kind of pressure regardless of how much money was involved."

Robert founded Fight Night, an annual D.C. boxing gala that raises money for children's charities, and he is part of a group of investors seeking ownership of the Washington Nationals baseball franchise. His business was built largely on managing assets of failed savings and loans.

Early last year, JER was trying to do business with the Teachers' Retirement System of Illinois, which manages pension money for teachers in the state's public schools. The indictment outlining the alleged extortion attempt does not identify JER by name. Instead, it refers to "Investment Firm 4," described as a Virginia real estate investment and asset management firm that sought and received an $85 million investment from the teachers' pension fund.

Several sources with knowledge of the indictment said the Virginia firm was JER, as reported recently by the Chicago Tribune. Minutes of a pension fund board meeting say that, in May 2004, the board approved an $85 million investment in JER Real Estate Partners III LP.

According to the indictment, after the Virginia firm had made a pitch to members of the pension fund staff, then-board member Levine told representatives of the firm that he would like to help but could not talk with them directly because of restrictions on contact between members of the board and parties with business before it. Levine instead "used Cari to communicate" with the investment firm, the indictment alleges.

When the real estate firm did not sign the proposed consulting agreement that arrived by fax from an unnamed source in the Caribbean, Cari made a series of phone calls, the indictment alleges.

"Cari said that if Investment Firm 4 wanted to get money from [the teachers' pension fund], the company had to hire a consultant," the indictment said. "Cari said that if Investment Firm 4 did not enter into the consulting agreement by the end of the day, the company was going to lose the . . . commitment." In another conversation, Cari allegedly told lawyers for JER that if it didn't sign, the firm would be taken off the pension fund's May agenda, the indictment alleges.

When the real estate investment firm did not sign the consulting agreement, Levine directed a member of the pension fund staff to pull the firm off the agenda for the fund's May 2004 board meeting, the indictment alleges. The staff member refused, and on May 25, 2004, the board approved the $85 million investment.

Levine joined his fellow trustees in voting to approve it, according to board records.

PREVIOUS
Unicameral representation in a bicameral legislature? Holder is bogus. Exactly how to they propose preventing the District of Columbia from getting two Senate seats if they give it voting representation in the House? When everybody else has Senate seats? That would be unconstitutional.

....While D.C. v. Heller was being heard by the Supreme Court in 2008, Holder joined the Reno-led amicus brief, which urged the Supreme Court to uphold Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and said the position of the Department of Justice, from Franklin Roosevelt through Bill Clinton, was that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right to keep and bear arms for purposes unrelated to a State’s operation of a well-regulated militia. Wikipedia.

..."from Franklin Roosevelt through Bill Clinton?!?"... Big damn deal. The position of the Department of Justice from GEORGE WASHINGTON TO NOW has been no representation for the District of Columbia in the United States Congress. John Adams to now; Washington never actually lived in the White House or 'Executive Mansion.'

The whole idea behind having a bi-cameral legislature is being farce-ified in our nation's capitol; standing the concepts of Jefferson and Adams, George Mason and the other founding fathers on their head. We don't even have a viable city-wide legislature - CIA Mayor Fenty allows department heads to either blow off or send weak underlings down to the Council hearings [Rhee? CIA. Lanier? Certainly CIA-affiliated - 'all hands on deck' - if she isn't root CIA. The spending guy? Again, affiliated if he isn't professional in the CIA. The tax office-as-a-CIA-funding-mechanism-people? 'In your face' with it], where they apparently cannot be forced, coaxed, begged or conjoled into 'showing the cards' [out of the CIA stacked deck] anyway.

Now Ace Holder, the top legal beagle, is carefully preparing the first step in the government-led assault on the Constitution. Hand it to that otherwise worthless nest of mean vipers deployed to protect wrongdoers in government with the Justice Department, even they recognized the effort for what it was and threw him back the first time.

A Split At Justice On D.C. Vote Bill; Holder Overrode Ruling That Measure Is Unconstitutional, Carrie Johnson, The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: Apr 1, 2009. pg. A.1.

Justice Department lawyers concluded in an unpublished opinion earlier this year that the historic D.C. voting rights bill pending in Congress is unconstitutional, according to sources briefed on the issue. But Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who supports the measure, ordered up a second opinion from other lawyers in his department and determined that the legislation would pass muster.

A finding that the voting rights bill runs afoul of the Constitution could complicate an upcoming House vote and make the measure more vulnerable to a legal challenge that probably would reach the Supreme Court if it is enacted. The bill, which would give the District a vote in the House for the first time, appeared to be on the verge of passing last month before stalling when pro-gun legislators tried to attach an amendment weakening city gun laws. Supporters say it could reach the House floor in May.

In deciding that the measure is unconstitutional, lawyers in the department's Office of Legal Counsel matched a conclusion reached by their Bush administration counterparts nearly two years ago, when a lawyer there testified that a similar bill would not withstand legal attack.

Holder rejected the advice and sought the opinion of the solicitor general's office, where lawyers told him that they could defend the legislation if it were challenged after its enactment.

Democratic and Republican Justice Department veterans said it is unusual, though not unprecedented, for the solicitor general, who backs the administration's position before the Supreme Court, to be asked to weigh in before a case makes its way into a courtroom. Typically, legal scholars said, the solicitor general is asked whether the office can plausibly defend a law in court, rather than to opine directly on the legality of a piece of legislation. The office was asked for the opinion several weeks ago, before the Senate confirmed Elena Kagan as the new solicitor general.

Through a spokesman, Holder portrayed the basis for his override of the OLC ruling as grounded in law, not politics.

"The attorney general weighed the advice of different people inside the department, as well as the opinions of legal scholars, and made his own determination that the D.C. voting rights bill is constitutional," Matthew Miller said. "As the leader of the department, it is his responsibility to make his best independent legal judgment, and he believes that although there are reasonable arguments on both sides of the issue, ultimately the bill would constitutionally grant D.C. residents a right to elect a voting representative in Congress."

Holder's decision to get involved may expose President Obama's Justice Department to some of the same concerns raised by Democrats during George W. Bush's presidency.

Democrats claimed then that political considerations infused decisions on subjects including environmental regulations and national security policy. In particular, Bush's OLC drew criticism when lawyers allegedly shaped their analysis on harsh interrogation tactics and warrantless eavesdropping to fit the views of superiors in the White House.

M. Edward Whelan III, who was a deputy at OLC during the Bush administration, said when informed of the matter that Holder's decision to override the office's conclusions amounted to a "blatant abuse" of the office's purpose.

Questions over the constitutionality of a D.C. voting bill have dogged the proposal throughout its journey through Congress. Some legal experts say that because the District is not a state, the proposal does not square with a constitutional requirement that House members be chosen "every second year by the people of the several states." Others argue that the Constitution gives Congress broad power over the District, including the ability to grant it a full House seat.

Both Holder and Obama have expressed support for D.C. voting rights in the past. In an interview earlier this year, Obama described himself as a "strong proponent" of giving the District voting representation in Congress. As a U.S. senator, he co-sponsored a similar measure two years ago. Signing the legislation would represent a political victory for him, even if the Supreme Court later reversed the law, said sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the controversy is sensitive and ongoing.

Holder, who has lived in the District for more than two decades, co-signed a 2007 letter with other prominent lawyers supporting D.C. voting rights legislation.

The measure would create two new permanent seats in the House, one for the District and one for Utah, although that seat could transfer to a different state based on the results of the 2010 census.

In 2007 testimony before the Senate, Bush lawyer John P. Elwood said that the D.C. voting rights legislation was not constitutional because the District is not a state.

"In the absence of a constitutional amendment, therefore, the explicit provisions of the Constitution do not permit Congress to grant congressional representation to the District through legislation," he told lawmakers.

Advocates of the measure note that its constitutionality has been endorsed by powerful legal voices, including the American Bar Association, former federal appellate judge Kenneth W. Starr and former Justice Department lawyer Viet D. Dinh. Starr and Dinh have written a legal brief supporting the bill.

Supporters note that courts have often treated the District as if it were a state, addressing, for example, questions of whether D.C. residents are subject to laws governing federal taxation, interstate commerce and the right to a jury trial.

The Office of Legal Counsel remains a source of intense interest in the legal community and on Capitol Hill, where Senate Republicans have delayed a vote to confirm Dawn Johnsen, an Indiana University law professor nominated to lead the office. Johnsen, who served as acting leader of the office during the Clinton administration, has been a vocal critic of political influence there and has advocated for more transparency in the work of its lawyers.

A dispute over advice from the office inspired one of the most dramatic episodes of the Bush administration, when then-White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales rushed to the bedside of ailing Attorney General John D. Ashcroft in 2004, in an unsuccessful effort to get him to overrule OLC opinions about the government's warrantless wiretapping program. More than half a dozen law enforcement officials threatened to resign if the president ignored OLC conclusions that the program was illegal.

At his confirmation hearing in January, Holder promised to review OLC opinions issued by the Bush administration. "We don't change OLC opinions simply because a new administration takes over," he said. "The review that we would conduct would be a substantive one and reflect the best opinions of probably the best lawyers in the department as to where the law would be, what their opinions should be. It will not be a political process, it will be one based solely on our interpretation of the law."

Staff writer Mary Beth Sheridan, research editor Alice Crites and researcher Eddy Palanzo contributed to this report.

2009-01-27T17:34:00.000-08:00

Bad Fed. Geithner Boy Wonder sours in CIA-orchestrated 'hasty' reporting to Congress; Henry Paulson undertook blatant trickery and this is not going the right way. Is Congress really so hard to work with? Barney Frank and Chris Dodd; do they understand this is a private organization?

And, insofar as we are lending directly from our Treasury, is 'the Fed' now essentially redundant beyond clearing paper checks? What are they doing? Assigning - hugely increasing - the regulatory power of the Fed, as an ultimate Bush-era 'privatization'? Undertaken by a couple of Democrats?

Oh, how they still kiss his ass.

The British deserved to lose an empire and their world influence [it is still alive and well but now gone covert under the table, cheapened in deregulated banking as they prostitute themselves and their history and way of life to the Jews]; Lady Astor marked the Crown Prince Francis Ferdinand for death at Cliveden in something like 1910 or '12. The Revolutionary War was not entirely lost and in theory we might have briefly been secretly gleeful; they let a divorced American woman draw the curtains on their heritage at a garden party.

The plaque is to Wilson who was an idiot trapped in the same scam; the problem with gleeful is that our president promptly dropped his drawers and bent over for 'the fix' and a war view which destroyed Europe unproductively, diminished once proud 'equal' international and trading partners - Brazil, and ultimately screwed us in headlong flight through a narrowing economic tunnel lacking clear and obvious exit strategies.

Just 'say no' to the bailout. Well, they've never 'said no' before; indeed, we hastened in pursuit of the game but in our defense we were sold on the concept of a win-win outcome when nothing could be further from the truth in the hearts of the essentially Satanic manipulators.

When they tried to force it on Ben Strong he wouldn't take the job, 'till a couple of the inside boys took him out of town for a weekend and put it to him one way or the other. Paul Warburg was one of them, and in all seriousness we don't know what they said.
All we know for sure is that Ben Strong ran the Federal Reserve, reconstituted English currency and stabilized the European markets following 'the Great War' [World War I] without much thought for our own unemployed at home, and then, right before the Depression hit, died. In 1928. Proving in the end that he was still at heart a fundamentally good man, and that Alfred Sloan and DuPont and the whole leadership gang - Rockefeller was supposedly in on it - who took down [William Crapo] Durant at General Motors were just slime fixers and manipulators.

Did they kill him?
Did they kill Vance the weekend Bush choked on the pretzel, blacked out, and hit his head on the coffee table?
Proxmire as the Patriot Act extension was being voted in the Senate, after hustling him out of town right before 911?

J. Edgar Hoover totally exonerated; he saw all the games they were playing.
Which three presidents are not buried in the United States?
My guess is Lincoln, Kennedy, and either Grant or Woodrow Wilson; of course if its Wilson the soon-to-be-named director of the FBI wins big. On top of Warren G. Harding joining the Ku Klux Klan in a secret White House ceremony before conceptually 'dying in 1923' when in reality he probably didn't?
Are you kidding?
Before the orchestrated 'Great Depression [I]'.
Hoover stands as a giant surrounded by little kids and swine.

A statue of 'Earth', apparently before or anyway in the very early stages of the 'extraction paradigm' they have used to rape her. "Bend over Mother Earth! Zionists are bent on manipulation!"

Of course the Federal Reserve is a funding mechanism for Israel. They had the cash flow before they had the country.

Unwitting cop stands out front as cover for 'the era of the great racketeering' which was just then getting underway.

The War Department and the State Department used to fit together under one roof, in the dull days before America's 'ruling elite' decided we wanted to takeover the enslavement of Africa through a bribe sheet empowering a thin band of technocrats and bureaucracy figures who educate their children in foreign countries and mouth the proper buzz words. Heck; this was back in the heady era after we'd knocked the good guys out of Cuba [Spain? By then? Benevolent. Maybe not originally, but by then] but before we used Castro as a CIA device to serve as a conceptual 'dagger at the throat' in a fixed theater piece unfolding across decades with the island people essentially enslaved.

And our military was still jaunty with a Jeep and a Colt .45; four-deuce mortar rather than today's android sunglasses and Nazi helmet and targeting our own guys for death. Or having their legs blown off; crippled Navy SEAL Lt. Commander with his legs blown off in Iraq in March 200[6], discharged June of the same year, sleeping in a battery operated electric wheelchair outside the Verizon Center in downtown Washington D.C.

The picture is really pre-Jeep which only came with the War [WWII] but look at the tank on the truck. Almost jaunty. Make it lighter, stronger, with heavier weapons, more power and a radio... it had promise, but didn't ever make it on a widespread basis. In the end the Jeep as a scout vehicle for fleets of utility Sherman tanks is what carried the war for us... wasn't it? Bazooka? Just damn jaunty. Heat the soup in your steel pot; that is basic infantry. Candy for the little kids, and don't let 'em be spying for the bad guys.

The same does not hold true for everybody, though. Crap out the Joint Strike Fighter. Put it out of its misery. Buy up F-22s, and break out the JSF as different planes in its multiple roles rather than accepting a CIA gimp design. F4 Phantom was the last true multi-role plane we deployed, and we should leave the concept there. The Communists used to beat us up over North Vietnam; it was simply an inadequate airplane. Now you want to revisit the issue, ADDING a vertical takeoff and landing requirement? Get out of town. Put the beast out of its misery.

AND tell the CIA to stop larding up F22 costs. I bet they're trying to make it unattractive by using it as a funding mechanism. Swine.

I don't know if all this gear was meant to be on the single heavy truck in wartime and that confuses the picture. Truck as a rolling fortress? The cannon itself looks... small. But to be charitable, light by cannon standards and mobile. Maybe as a niche weapon [a helicopter can drop in heavier cannon, but do they resupply ammo by helicopter or truck? Pallet by helicopter, but I bet they burn through it pretty quick].
A problem today is all the contractors seeing an ongoing revenue stream in 'smart weapons' that destroy themselves on impact to the tune of twelve million dollars a pop, supported by our military training to 'step on sparks' rather than securing the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Facilitated by riding in helicopters for ten-month tours in-country as opposed to walking out and marrying a local.

What are you going to leave the Afghans with? Smart weapons or cannons [that we ourselves don't use]. Any thoughts on bringing back the four deuce mortar? Do we want to create an Afghan army that 'hits and runs' like we do, or are we expecting them to stay and fight?

Different view of the same cannon. Contractors looking for money. Eisenhower and Marshal were reconfiguring the Army right about in this time-period for the coming struggle; Long Johns and self propelled 155mm tubes at the end, did we go in with adequate cannons at the start? How long have we been in Afghanistan - eight years? No rush.

A public service blogspot hoping to start conversations if not reach decisions. Poor bastards don't see the full picture; State Department and the Federal Reserve call the war shots I bet. What can you do? Choke down on the CIA interacting with your command, and make them play an honest game. Oppose the Swine.

Escalation

2008-12-20T10:50:00.000-08:00

In with the airplanes in the New York Towers; out with the airplane in the New York river.

Sort of like Mark Twain and Halley's Comet only different.

A New York Yankee pitcher [Cory Lidle] was smashed in-flight into a building along the river which I claim is about 'half of each' or kind of an interim CIA designator but no matter; whether he was going to snitch the whole scam out or not the image of the sport remains - from their perspective - 'pure.'

Andrew Cuomo is arguing a case in which [Eliot Spitzer] 'sued national banks to enforce state laws' before the Supreme Court; CIA Chief Justice John Roberts just agreed to hear it. Word on the streets is that while Bush did kill Rehnquist or radiate him, John Roberts was significantly eager for the chair and pushed hard.

Anyway, I fear they're going to let Cuomo use Spitzer's action as an excuse to go after Kennedy when exactly the reverse is the case. If he really is a reformer he is much more capable of acting exactly where he is, and given that none of the other senators [Shelby or Dodd who have buckets of experience] are willing to articulate the CIA 'banking fix' it doesn't seem likely Cuomo would be the first. What we need is Caroline Kennedy sitting there pulling off and redirecting at least 10 to 15% of the bailout funding towards the poor. Fair is fair; the bailout shouldn't be all for the rich bastards who use it for executive compensation and to buy more banks.

What does Kennedy do? One word. Deliver. For gimps, for retards, for all the people that make me uncomfortable when I am around them and I really don't like to even talk about it. If Cuomo comes here he is going to get his dick cut off, and essentially be a weaker Caroline Kennedy anyway, so you might as well go for the real thing. D'Amato, Moynihan - they were big guys, and they couldn't swing it to avert the Bush travesty which I suspect they saw coming though perhaps not to the absurd extent Bush has taken it in crashing private planes and whatnot. And to the extent he is for real, Cuomo can better serve the nation in New York.

Lifelong Republican and 'old Nixon man' concerned about the growing disparity in income [especially given these top bastards evidently aren't all that smart anyway],

Andrew Bestor

Started with planes in the New York Towers, and ended with a plane in the New York river. Mitigating the monkey presidency of George W. Bush.

Troubling is that he evidently has leaned on Obama, with
'faith-based' government subsidy, and
the attack on Social Security continuing.

Michelle Rhee CIA-in-the-public schools was Bush.
'No Child Advance Unmonitored',
Oxley Sarbanes,
completion of the 'Seat belt, baby car seat, 21-year-old drinking age and .08 blood alcohol' agenda,
beginning of registration of cows in Wisconsin, and
preclusionary requirements for volunteer firemen;

end-of-the-day, George W. Bush was just a regulation whore.

The most intensive regulatory regime in United States history by far but even worse is the implication of unchecked CIA expansion into the economy and society.

Mike Huckabee, supposedly serious candidate from Arkansas - as if we need another regime from Arkansas - advocated getting rid of the income tax in favor of a national sales tax. Under Reagan, the income tax conceptually went down, but health care and college tuition skyrocketed. I used to greatly love Reagan, but its becoming increasingly evident the CIA stabbed him in the back as bad if not worse than Carter; all of that increase - college tuition and health care - evidently representing CIA funding mechanisms and skim. To the point where Huckabee can now just say we should entirely go with their skim and get rid of the income tax.

You know what they say; 'Capital punishment and torture or enhanced questioning isn't necessarily wrong - just that it so rarely happens to the right people.'

Arson in New Hampshire commensurate to the restrictions on volunteer firemen;
a national epidemic of 'drift over the center line' head-on car accidents almost inevitably resulting in fatalities. Leading to a minor cluster of crashed medivac responder helicopters. Swine.

What is to be done?

I very much support eliminating 'the cap' on Social Security contributions.

That one thing is the most serious issue facing our society, and it broadly impacts savings and spending if you are looking for a consumer-based consumption model to save us.

Obama and Biden can and should articulate that and feel good about it; the Republicans may be able to continue the rich people's tax breaks in return. That is a fair trade.

We need to legalize drugs in the United States both for us - to seriously attack the illicit drug market and usage, and because people need LSD, and to mitigate violence in Mexico. Now.

As it stands, we've almost lost two party democracy in favor of the CIA manipulation agenda, and the criminal whore John McCain is pretty much to blame for that. Aside from the carrier fire, the man simply flat out was not "native born American" and there was no pretending he was. From there the whole thing went to crap, and if you here people talking on hate radio about Obama, the first thing you better say is that the whore McCain was flat out not born in the United States.
Other side of the coin is that Biden needs to start stepping up to mitigate the attack on Obama, speaking out against privatizing Social Security or Social Security accounts, and cutting back on 'faith-based' subsidy.

Defend the unions. $40 billion as a first step toward rebuilding our inflight refueling capability with another $40 billion almost certainly to follow? The pendulum swung out too far to the contractors; have the Air Force design it and United Auto Workers build it [like they built the JSF mockup] with assembly in St. Louis trying to mitigate the CIA attack designator which swept up both St. Louis and McDonnell Douglas.

$150,000 dollar-a-year police and firemen; $100,000 dollar-a-year bus drivers; none of that is in the contract. That is just crap management we have to get ahold of. Don't throw down the union system; toughen up the negotiating. If you get really pissed, use the Army to run the subways for a couple months. The unions will come around. Yes, I think there is a Republican future there - big gun owners and hunters, fairly religious; that territory shouldn't belong to the Democrats.

The CIA has a dog pound agenda. With $80,000 dollar-a-year directors, and $60,000 dollar-a-year assistants [no joke, and that was for a county out in Missouri or somewhere like that. It wasn't Manhattan or Cook County]. Most places can get by on a $16,000 to $24,000 dollar-a-year animal control officer, and from there the person has to graduate into a police K-9 unit or something.
Not every position is a career position.
I would be tempted to go the other way as a career option, and staff the dog pound with somebody else like a parole officer, and put convicts coming up for work release inside cleaning every day. Its really a parole officer who happens to run a dog pound, and a trustee goes out with a pickup truck to bring in the dead deer at the side of the road.

Support rail improvements. Bush attacked American Airlines and their MD-80 fleet last summer, cause enough for rail infrastructure development. Geese strike put the plane - piloted by the nationally recognized safety expert instead of some yo off the flight line - into the river in New York [not really but for the sake of the argument]; there's ANOTHER couple billion to Amtrak.
Now we need short run MAGLEV development New York into Pennsylvania and the Iowa Tech Corridor to Chicago to East Lansing/Ann Arbor/Detroit; time to get the show on the road. F***ing geese.

The Republicans are looking for a national chairman, but all they're getting is hacks and churn. For God's sake, at least interview George Allen for the job, and at least get some truly conservative ideas. There is ebb and flow in the universe; if you outlaw cockfighting you're probably going to starve some African or bankrupt somebody in sleepy small town western Iowa or Kansas. Was cockfighting that bad that you should outlaw it as opposed to telling your kid its for shady losers without much of a future?

Bush was the big volunteer guy, who decided to regulate volunteer fire departments and drive them out of business in favor of professional departments? George Allen won't go for that, but will probably take the opposite - and correct - ideological approach; not only do you encourage the volunteer fire department but get the mayor of the town to go to their potluck dinner.

Throwing the New York Senate race to Hillary Clinton BOTH in 2000 AND 2006? No, you don't get to cheat for somebody TWICE.

On the other hand, I support complete or at least significant legalization of drugs like alcohol. A lot of politicians secretly do, but really criminalizing drug usage creates a demand representing a CIA funding mechanism so they can't support legalization,
and George Allen above everybody else represented a tough-guy lock 'em up approach. Well, hopefully getting ambushed by Bush has matured his thinking. On the one hand, your drug problem shouldn't be your neighbor's real estate problem - with losers hanging around and idling in the street; on the other hand there is no prohibition in the Constitution, and the one time we tried it we changed our mind quick. We need to somehow realign the government so policy improves society and ends the violence in Mexico. Without radiating the ghetto for example.

'No Child' had its chance; now we need to go to single sex education - boys schools and girls schools - rather than privatization.

Dear Senator Allen,

I feel the so-called 'Charter School' movement has significantly undermined parochial schools - notably Catholic schools, which used to represent a REAL faith-based alternative to public schools.

That is really stupid, in my opinion, because those Catholic school teachers were pretty good, incredibly inexpensive, and the kids got a solid background in discipline, faith, and 'continuity' with the school experience broadly impacting the community in a positive way, beyond being sheltered in a charter school simply because there are discipline issues in the public schools.

Can we go back to the way it was?

Yours truly,
A Protestant who went to a Catholic Sixth Grade and it was pretty good.

Why can't Obama do any of this? Maybe he will; I am excited and I want change - he certainly can do these things and I think he has brought good guys in. Leon Panetta looks good to me insofar as Stansfield Turner never really ran the CIA and George Tenet was a thug who prepared the CIA to undertake the attacks on 9/11. Huckabee, Romney and Company [Sarah Palin et al.] are just hacks who hearken back to the Bush administration and have never sufficiently renounced Jeb.

The story only goes downhill with Bush.
The Bush-originated attack on Cheney.

1.'Privatizing' Social Security was an issue first articulated under Clinton;
2. targeting Saddam Hussein for internal shortcomings in government was undertaken under Clinton;
3.'deregulation' of the financial institutions with a 'hands off' approach to debt/equity swaps and derivative sales was expanded under Clinton [the massive 'China trade' was begun under Clinton and may have even been planned in detail by Hillary Clinton at Wal-Mart then under Bush]:

in short, it is essentially impossible - beyond the realm of reason - to ignore the 'Bush-Clinton-Bush-[Hillary-in-State]' continuity mechanism, including at the very 'center of the cumulative storm' which probably won't ruin but is overtly, consciously intended to significantly downgrade our country.

What does anybody have against Dick Cheney?

He did say "Deficits don't matter." That was wrong. You can even argue that was emblematic of the Bush headlong rampage into catastrophe, but that was a description or excuse as opposed to a command. "They" - the manipulators; the Bush-Clinton Council on Foreign Relations and other criminal elements in the inner circle prearranging policy - had their program fully developed and Cheney was never able to stop it from unfolding, but that is nowhere close to responsibility for it.

Did Cheney ever deny Bush anything?

Bush murdered Rehnquist, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Opposed by Cheney. Bush wiped out New Orleans with a hurricane, and it simply is not possible to say Cheney was in fact really behind that. Bush gimped the nation 'a day late and a dollar short' except in wasting money on security infrastructure which is ultimately going to be used against us - 'we the people' - while Cheney carried a shotgun and did his own dirty work.

Now, as time runs out, Bush is going to save his 'legacy'.... the legacy of shame and fraud and deliberate indifference.... by trying to ultimately blame it all on Cheney. Forget about GITMO - in fact the toilet level at the National Cathedral on Wisconsin Avenue; torture was routine in Vietnam and for some reason an overt effort was made to legitimize it now by moving it into the court system. Had they left it in the field you wouldn't have heard about it. Nobody should give a damn about Cheney or his people being hard-ass guys in pursuing it; the real question is 'why the effort was made to move it into the courts in the first place.' The end of habeas corpus after Clinton wanted additional search powers in public housing complexes was certainly at the hands of the first Mexican American to ever be made attorney general. Are people now claiming Gonzalez suffered a volitional impairment? Turns out he wasn't really a lawyer? Or that Bush was a passive spectator, overcome by events? What was behind the death of Rehnquist other than Bush wanting to long term 'pack the court'? Was Rehnquist not giving them the rulings they wanted? No; just that Bush wanted to put his guy Roberts in.

Did Cheney attack Senator Johnson from South Dakota [we do know for sure Bush used radiation on Rehnquist]; did Cheney murder Senator Thomas from Wyoming, frame Ted Stevens, or blackmail Larry Craig into looking ridiculous in a men's room as various aspects of an attack upon the legislative branch? Put Kennedy into a concrete barrier or have Cynthia McKinney attacked by a policeman?

Did Cheney make the Africans suffer treatments rather than giving them the CURE for AIDS [N-Dimethyl or the trade name Rifampicin at levels right below hemo toxicity or serious ocular changes], and then get all sanctimonious and self-righteous about it as a great legacy?

Did Cheney pound Florida with hurricanes in 2004?

You are out of your ****ing mind. Bush is swine, and Cheney's great shortcoming has been in failing to identify Bush for what he is and the Bush-Clinton-Bush-[Clinton] CIA continuity mechanism for what it is. Entirely getting rid of the Department of Education and instead 'block funding' grants out to the states [being generous as a concession and letting Medicaid transport retarded school children], sharply limiting this 'endless copyright' great law scam which is totally unconstitutional, 'show the cards' in providing neuro stimulants to mitigate the dementia onset caused by radiation exposure; the real Bush legacy and triumph is in crushing the conservative movement for another generation. The rest is sideshow or distraction.

Ed Cox, R-NY - a candidate for reconstruction

2007-10-20T08:24:00.000-07:00

Hillary's declaration of war, plotting to seize power since before the convention. The graphic is from Roll Call, 11 Aug 2008, page 17.

Nixon's son-in-law Ed Cox. 'The conservatives' were in control 2001 to 2009 and it didn't go so well; I don't think a strong conservative will be able to win without cheating for at least a couple decades. And I was never happy with the intrusive morality that branch of the party represented anyway; Larry Craig should have run again. The election was then a year out; alternately, they threw a bunch of other races so I don't know what would have stopped them from throwing his, but except for that possibility he was faithful to the State of Idaho.

Beyond being a sharp guy, Obama ran a good campaign and deserved to win. The biggest problem facing us abroad is separating unemployed - and angry - youth from real terrorists, and Obama - street organizer - is much more qualified to tackle that problem than John McCain - pilot who bombed from three miles up. Looking at the McCain and Palin fiasco 2008, all I can say is that Nixon's wife Pat famously wore a cloth coat, and its time for moderate Republicans to move passed all the faith crap and get to the problems which need to be addressed.

2012 is Obama's and Biden's to lose.

How can we build around that? How can we channel that energy? Those are the immediate questions.
Geo. W. Bush and Karl Rove 'anticipating Republican dominance into the future' meant 'run for the life boats' and abandon ship. This is also a story of great betrayal, actually on both sides - 'enemies in the camp' selling out their candidates in Oregon [until that race was recovered, perhaps by Ron Wyden] and Minnesota which is still very much up in the air; Franken won but they're taking it away from him. They took it from Stevens in Alaska. How can the good Democrats - the non-swine anti-manipulation elements - recover; and how can we help that recovery? That is the context in which the immediate questions are asked.

How can we avoid the 'world domination theory' the other guys - the bad Democrats - are secretly plotting? There was talk about knocking an asteroid out of orbit so it went out like a boomerang and returned as an attack on Earth, instigated in coordination with the 15 Nov global finance meeting in Washington D.C.-type stuff. Oh, swine! That is the larger question, and it is actually a pressing national security concern.

Article. III. Section. 3. ...[N]o attainer of treason will work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the lifetime of the person attained.
Who are 'they'? Read 'em an' weep. We will name names; bad, bad Democrats. Really wicked ones. Schumer and Feinstein for sure; there may be others. Scary is that the mission to maybe knock the asteroid out of orbit actually launched: Screw the 'CIA-flying- nuclear-weapons-around-the-U.S.-on-a-B-52' and 'nuclear-fuse-assemblies-to-Taiwan' military reform effort; nobody secured our space assets, or whoever did let these clowns just walk in and take 'em away.

What does 'that-they-were-able-to-do-it' really tell us? Council on Foreign Relations has a much more immediate 'in' with our space program than most people realize, and the space program itself is much more active - in actual space work beyond occasional launches and ongoing monitoring - than is generally understood.

This is a blogspot dedicated to rebuilding the moderate wing of the conservative movement - without cheating.

Please stay tuned. Your awareness is appreciated.

2007-09-14T12:28:00.000-07:00

Bush went over there which is known, and he met with Abe which is not as widely known. The problem is that after their meeting, BUSH was suppose to resign - not Abe.

Of course the Japanese are rejecting aspects of militarization - with George W. Monkey seated at the wheel, so is everybody else including people in Zimbabwe who could obviously benefit from it. Abe is not the issue - it is Bush.

The Japanese construction companies employ thousands of men, wear uniforms, have morning formations, and undertake physical exercise together. Run mess sections, structure hierarchy, and maintain levels of internal communications. With more and longer meetings than you would like, but they do.
Is the world suffering from a shortage of infantry men? Do we need more helicopter assault battalions? The South Koreans fight like demons and it is true, having pacifist Japanese between us and a potential battlefront in South Korea might have been problematic but we seem to be over that hump anyhow.

Mobilize their construction companies. Does Darfur need UN troops or an interstate highway system? Assuming the 'Great One' or 'Our Father' or whatever the **** they're calling him these days eventually dies and North Korea falls apart, who would you have build a coastal railroad - the Japanese already have strong ties to the Chinese; could you segment the line, with the South Koreans building north, the Chinese building south, and the Japanese building a stretch in the middle?

Once the six party talks have resolved the nuclear issue, what are they going to talk about? Assuming the Chinese haven't built railroad track bed to the coast of North Korea while waiting for change, is there any interest in a Joint Venture building it in anticipation of one day connecting on the North Korean side?
In the United States our National Guard units have two week summer camps [Annual Training or FTX]. Is there any interest in having construction executives from the two, three, four, or five nations make a precursor visit, followed by
a. a unified summer camp of 'concept only' meetings,
b. a unified summer camp of survey and schematic layout,
c. a unified summer camp of 'border improvements' which might be dirt work and skill exhibition using heavy equipment [Japanese equipment arriving on a South Korean freighter for a composite crew which eats Chinese food with a glass of Russian vodka in the evening].

Suggestion: Chinese, Japanese, Korean - if the countries actually put forward their best guys, you need to have them do something real and useful. 'Build a bridge' literally or something. If they're lazy guys you can just hold meetings, but good guys will want to work, and somebody who isn't doing their share is going to 'catch a little flack.'

The Japanese are and should be players and arguably should prepare for a larger role particularly in the region, only their people take one look at the impostor Bush and won't let their own politicians significantly even talk it - and its hard to blame them. Smart people.

So Bush and the LDP sat down and developed a plan to 'end run' the Japanese Constitution in militarizing the society. In fairness to the man, it isn't just Bush. In 1994 CIA executives Bill Richardson - now running for the presidency - and Peter Bourne conspired with conservative elements in Japanese government to preserve the dominance of Giminto or the Liberal Democratic Party as they lost their monolithic hold on politics and were forced into a series of coalition governments, which Richardson and Bourne promptly collaborated in undermining. The Socialist Strawman, Punching Bag Murayama? Remember him? Thank Richardson and Bourne, noting that Clinton - actually both of them, Hillary and Bill combined - couldn't or anyway didn't hold them back.

Oh what swine, shoving that up Abe's *** so hard they put him in the hospital 13 years later.

MoveOn.org may be CIA-orchestrated, and this is the best proof to date. An ad that deliberately goes a little too far in controversy, and it isn't good to make fun of somebody's name anyway. That's a little kid mistake they did to disparage the debate.

But that is the Bush Administration in its entirety save for Cheney and probably a couple other serious guys behind the scenes. Everything in public is certainly an embarrassment.

Pending

2007-07-22T10:46:00.000-07:00

Reserved.

The Effort to Force Bush Out

2006-12-29T13:33:00.001-08:00

Wayne Downing, four star general in the United States Army dead at age 67 - conceptually in a hospital bed.

Downing was a 34-year Army veteran, and his last active-duty assignment was as commander in chief of the U.S. Special Operations Command at MacDill Air Force Base near Tampa, Fla., in 1996.... [L.A. Times].
Washington Post suggested he was Special Forces at Bragg in the early 1990s, right before we killed about hundreds of our own guys perhaps at Benning but definitely in the winter time in the 1990s [http://thelostbenningboys.blogspot.com]. He would have at least heard about that. It might be possible to date that incident by looking at 'New American Century' literature and signature blocks, suspecting the hardening position and uptick readiness was one result of spreading awareness.

[L.A. Times]After his military retirement, he emerged as a more public figure when he became deeply involved in terrorism task forces and committees.... Downing oversaw the 40-member team that investigated the June 1996 truck-bomb attack that killed 19 U.S. servicemen and one Saudi and wounded 372 other people at Khobar Towers, a U.S. military housing complex in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia... [end citation].

It sounds like Downing was a genuinely good man who blundered into the Bush trap scenaio, ultimately saw what was going on, and, now guessing they were watching him quite closely [look for a proximate duplicity - it's been twelve years since he left the service and they easily could have hung somebody on him], when they saw that Downing had passed the 'pivot point' they quickly took him down.

How does this effect the other four star generals? 'Better to never be for Bush, than to be for Bush and burn on it' because then they do kill you. If you're consistantly against Bush the downside isn't that bad - they just don't appoint you to the honorary commissions or make you Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.

Creighton Abrams. He was a general, by God. He pulled the Army out of Vietnam and didn't cry about it, and I bet he would have gone back in when the North Vietnamese invaded but the CIA threw down Nixon, and then Ford took the Kissinger-Bush line in giving it to the Chinese. With Abrams conveniently dead of lung cancer. Supposedly George W. Bush flew A-10 in Southeast Asia, and it would have been for the CIA in the mid-1970s. 'Show of force' just to let them know we hadn't cowed, even though we really had and they knew it.

That's history. Now its Tommy Franks - kiss ass or kick ass? We really don't know, but the field artillery has largely been sold in favor of high priced jointness motif smart weapons, which, end of the day, seem to be killing as many civilians as the artillery did at ten times the cost. What are we planning to leave the Afghans with? Are we going to give them drones? We're damn near helpless without the drones - how will they be able to function? What about the Iraqi military - are we going to sell them F-22 fighters and fiber optic cable circles, or give them PRC-77s with a 105 mm cannon on a truck bed?

Sorry. Downing seems to have been genuinely well-intended, but that really isn't good enough as the police state [led by Michael Chertoff of the 'Chertoff for Kerik' bait-and-switch] closes in on us. CIA hires Taliban to attack our guys in Afghanistan for $5 dollars a day. He leaves us with a mixed verdict: Downing backed Bush - perhaps against his better judgement - but he was never duplicitous like that, though we definitely have generals over there [in Iraq anyway] who are, and he didn't call them out on it. And there seems to be treason in the Special Forces he was either shielded from or anyway did not resolve.

Donald Rumsfeld with Saddam Hussein 19-20 Dec 1983. Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense longer than anybody else save McNamara, and he only missed that by a couple of weeks. I think this is why.

Three Points Related to Campaign 2008

1. The Vela Incident of 22 September 1979 [explosion of a neutron bomb in the Southern Indian Ocean] almost certainly relates to inoculation of the first AIDS victims/carriers in Africa. Having down selected to CIA Mugabe in Rhodesia the previous April-May-June, Allard Lowenstein bringing the virus to Africa.

2. Iraq invading Iran on 22 September 1980 almost certainly advances that allegedly ‘defensive’ paradigm in battlefield applications of NBC or anyway biological and chemical warfare.

At issue is really handling an alien interface with a larger ‘reciprocity concept’ or ‘ying and yang’ paradigm.

3. There is no salary associated with being ‘First Lady’ – perhaps there should be but there isn’t. IF Hillary Clinton took CIA money [continued to draw her CIA salary or otherwise got Agency compensation] while she was in the White House at least through 1994 when she was working both health care and establishing a ground surveillance capability relative to Sheila Bilyeu, she should leave the 2008 race.

It’s preclusionary – her candidacy is based on people’s ignorance. If its true, she should quit.

Philip K. Dick, James Gunn, and K.W. Jeter.

“It’s not what I expected,” said Dortz slowly. “I thought everything about Project Psyche was a fake – all that stuff about psychonauts, and going into the Collective Unconscious. All bullshit covering up what they were really planning.”

“It isn’t?”

“I’m not sure anymore. This Dybosphere stuff - maybe they were using the phrase wrong, but they apparently had found something.... Some kind of universal field- like electromagnetic, but different, down on a subatomic level - with an interface in the human brain. Every human brain. The field apparently has a sentience of its own, though the Dybosphere researchers weren’t able to determine its exact nature. Somehow it overlaps and extends certain sections of human intelligence - subconscious areas, mostly. What happens is that field, being nonmaterial, inserts an otherwise unexplainable factor of free will into the material, and thus deterministic, nature of the human mind. Shit, I don’t know if I’m explaining this right. Human consciousness is a symbiosis. We’re just not aware of the other entity - the field, or Collective Unconscious, or whatever you want to call it - being part of us. It’s like it hides itself in us where we can’t even see it. What it gets from its symbiosis with the human race is the ability to move and operate in the material universe; what we get is a nondeterministic element - free will – in our own nature. But it’s not originally part of us; it came from somewhere else.”

Legger sat for a few seconds, letting the information filter in. “This is all stuff the Dybosphere researchers found out?”

Dortz tapped the black binders. “It’s all in here. And more stuff I haven’t gotten to yet.”

“And they located- this field? They know how to, like, reach it?”

For a second, Dortz’ eyes flicked toward him, then back to the road. “That’s right.”

He [Legger] knew the answer even before he spoke, but [ ][e]very word had to be exposed to the light. “What,” he said, “do they plan on doing to it?”

Dortz was staring straight before himself. “They’re going to kill it.”

Citation is from Death Arms, K.W. Jeter, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1987, pages 130 and 131.
Earlier in the work there is a description of Project Psyche [from page 115]. “The only thing I liked about it [Christmas] was that we got the whole day off. The lab coat brigade switched off their bullshit machines, and laid off with their dopey tests. That was OK: a whole day without having to fuck with those cards, or get those electrodes plastered all over your head. Or dick around with those little gold leaf things inside those bell jars. I always hated all that shit.”

“Because you couldn’t do any of it.” A simple, quiet statement.

He snorted. “None of us could. Well, a couple, maybe. Buddy and Rachel – they always scared the hell out of me; glad I was in a different dorm from them.” What a strange little bunch we were; he shook his head, remembering. Two dozen kids all locked up; like some surrealist version of a Victorian workhouse. With wires taped all over our foreheads, staring at some needle in a vacuum, trying to make it twitch. All for [Strezliczek – Daddy Charlie] – and his bullshit search for psychic powers.
[End citation]

I was jogging up to Bethesda one day, and a guy jogs next to me in the same direction. We get to talking, and it turns out his dad knew Allard Lowenstein – the man who brought AIDS to Africa. Lowenstein had apparently said that at every stage of its existence police plants outnumbered ordinary Negroes in the Black Panthers which I thought was pretty extraordinary considering that had supposedly been the era of street activism - now the CIA just has crack heads run cars into street festivals. Anyway, the guy went on to say that he’d worked either for the Agency or the NIH in relatively close proximity to the Agency, and well into the 1980s they’d been intensely studying psychic phenomenon. He talked about a guy absorbing an entire bathtub full of water into his body through his ***hole, but – disparaging and vaguely funny in a sarcastic way - that is actually a famous example of a CIA disinformation ploy [it is true but its deceptively bumbling or seemingly harmless].

William Barr was a CIA lawyer who I think went on to be briefly Attorney General of the United States under George H. W. Bush. A ‘semi-covert’ Agency associate named Terry Reed alleged William Barr was the Agency project executive/ head liaison with the Clintons and Asa Hutchinson when they were running cocaine through Arkansas in the 1980s and ‘90s; anyway, from there Barr went into telecommunications and has headed industry relations with the government [and Congress].

If the CIA is burning up or radiating ‘human essence’ or ‘free will’ [Jeter pages 130 and 131], I think William Barr is the guy doing it or in charge of the effort, but it backs into Hillary Clinton.

George W. Bush is going soon – Wolfowitz, Gonzales, Bush; and I don’t understand why the Senate is giving him anything now. It will be viewed as tainted, and ‘experts’ like Michael Chertoff are guiding you further into a regulatory environment which, in light of the corrupt subtext, is diminishing rather than enhancing the nation and what we stand for [or once stood for]. In sum, the book by Jeter was published in 1987 and I suspect it fairly describes the effort Barr is leading which probably was initiated in parallel to Saddam Hussein NBC or biological and chemical attacks against Kurds and Iranians.

Negroes with AIDS. It is preclusionary, and Hillary Clinton should leave the 2008 presidential race.

Talking immigration, traditionally immigrant parents did not get Social Security benefits, changed in a tie vote broken by Al Gore under Clinton in favor of giving them benefits. In return for keeping the unification option, maybe Congress should do away with awarding them Social Security benefits believing that was hastily conceived. And definitely force Bush out first.

Marine General (Reserve} who George W. Bush called back to active duty for the 'New World Order' following 9/11 just died, but the obituary disappeared out of my Washington Post [late May 2007]. Douglas O'Dell commanded the embassy interface, apparently to make sure there weren't going to be any problems in the international community as we expanded our situational dominance. Bush could have had an active duty officer do it, but then there would have been a chance they'd tell him to shove it up his ***.

Orchestration. CIA setup actually in the World Bank using World Bank staff. Jews got the presidency of the organization, and now they're trying to leverage it in trading up.

Israel is per se too wealthy to qualify for World Bank funding on its own, but the Palestinians aren't and Israel has been sucking down World Bank funding to pay for check points at which to harass the natives. True - somehow they got the World Bank to fund Israeli security services,
and a guess is that Wolfowitz also managed to fund Mossad outposts in Jewish communities elsewhere [at one time they were strong in Latin America perhaps related to their use of drug smuggling as a funding mechanism].

Now reliable indicators suggest the Wolfowitz-Ali Riza controversy is entirely manufactured and, worse yet, they have people like the senior bank staffer from New Zealand tangled up in it.

Sad day for us, but understand their product is repression on the street in Africa. Since the days of the American Israeli Allard Lowenstein, CIA for sure and a guess is World Bank similarly supports
Robert Mugabe.
Swine.
Double swine.

And the VA Tech shooting was really a CIA mechanism for bringing talented 'engineering students who focused on water resources' and foreign language speakers into the Agency. You wish they were dead instead of working for the CIA. Covert.

ENRON had a water division under Rebecca Mark, and the entire industry had a bad reputation for swooping down on South American peasants and ripping them off.
Now the CIA has people with false identities ready to insert.
What swine.
What cowards.
How pathetic.
If its something you're proud of doing, you typically don't need a false identity. It comes across as childish lying.

Here comes gun control via a really duplicitous mechanism: Gun Law Pragmatism, E.J. Dionne Jr., Washington Post, April 20 2007 page A31; Koreans Aren't to Blame, Adrian Hong, same paper, same page. YES THEY ARE. All right; really they're not. It's government by Protocol of the Elders of Zion. Bush is swine, but the people who helped him in it aren't looking good either.

EMERGENCY ALERT. In the twilight of the rapidly fading Bush presidency, fear the worst. Before departing Washington for the Easter recess Bush held a question-and-answer period with media at which he misspoke or used poor grammar which they subsequently emphasized.
To David Gregory NBC: ...My concern, David, is several...
To Bill Plate CBS: ...suiciders...
To Ed Chen Bloomberg News: ...air traffickers...[which he said in lieu of airline passengers].

That event/sequence and the subsequent media coverage [Political Theater and the Critic in Chief, Dana Milbank, Washington Post, April 04 2007 page A2] is almost certainly an indicator of some kind.
Lauren Gross suggests Bush has up to four doubles which she says she saw when he [Bush] was CIA at NASA in the late 1970s, and she claims Porter Goss is in on it.

...A braided rope and brass posts kept reporters 20 feet from the president. The White House allowed only one network to videotape the event...

The verbal play - now noted as episodal - suggests an impostor was being used; perhaps even a particular impostor, though its possible or even likely the impostor does not reliably err and now has to do it by design. They kept reporters back, which may suggest visual disparity or discernable difference between the real Bush and the impostor most likely in profile.

The real question - where was Bush? Presumably off racketeering, using the impostor as a validation or confirmation point. The FEAR is that another terrorist attack is in the offing, and he was meeting with the major players - almost certainly including ties to the Jews and Israel - defining how it would play out.
If it wasn't that, it was continuity in the criminal manipulation of the markets and economy. Bush is swine - you have come to the right blogspot.

One winter late 1990s, 1200 American soldiers were killed and wrapped in plastic on a road perhaps at Benning. Bush made the point he wanted to make on September 11 2001, and anything beyond that works against him. He should just leave now.

Walter Schellenberg, man under Canaris who engineered the move of the German government into exile in 1945.

Academics are such ***holes.
Meanwhile, President Nixon viewed the worsening situation as an opportunity to demonstrate his so-called "Mad Man Theory"..... Nixon aide H.R. Haldeman later quoted how Nixon had explained the theory to him:
"I want the North Vietnamese to believe I've reached the point where I might do anything to stop the war. We'll just slip the word to them that 'For God's sake, you know, Nixon is obsessed about communism. We can't restrain him when he's angry - and he has his hand on the nuclear button....."

HEY ****head liberal, comfortable on the tenure tit with IV drip of nurture whore/comfort whore paradigm. Where do you think Nixon got that? ***hole.
Yes, in fact it turns out they just intended to let Henry Kissinger win for the rest of their lives, so they'd have something to moan about on the anti-war campus like old times. Be fashionably outspoken in their liberal agenda - any reference to Indians as a sports mascot is a crime against humanity - and very oppressive.
How about gays in the military? Lets let gays in the military. How about a signing bonus to get gays into the military - they're under-represented. All those gay people hankering to join the military. "Give me your poor, your restless" - wedged tight in the basic training chow line at the position of parade rest, the famous phrases assume much more literal meaning: "Make your buddy smile." What a bunch of ****.

Schellenberg and to a lesser extent Himmler played 'good cop' against the Nixon-Hitler lunatic figure with advanced Parkinson's and maybe syphilis to boot [now we know the Nazis started that rumor and not the Soviets as many people assumed].

You knew he was an artist - why are you surprised to discover he was an actor too?

This is the Swedish Count Bernadotte, who figured as a middleman and was later shot by the Jews in Jerusalem for his trouble [true - 1948]; now suspecting the CIA set him up for that as a sign of their sincerity and gratitude. Swine. Turns out he was fine dealing with Himmler - it was Allen Dulles, the Gentleman Spy, that took him down.

What is the bottom line truth in the matter. The Nazis had more devices than you would believe based on our own lame over-expensive and underproducing attempts. Get over it; Nagasaki was a better bomb.

The guess is that the Nagasaki bomb went out through Switzerland. These dates are somewhat tentative but look good as an initial cut.
April 13 they showed Hitler in newsreels as a hook,
April 20 Himmler met with Norbert Masur of the World Jewish Conference to work the deal for his own move into exile [they helped him - see note below],
April 21 Himmler and Schellenberg met with Bernadotte,
April 22 Schellenberg sent interned military attache Col. Vanamann over to Bern and that must have meant something probably related to the northern route - my guess is that Wolff and those guys handled the southern route on their own,
April 23 Schellenberg and Bernadotte met Flensburg; Himmler, Schellenberg, and Bernadotte met Lubeck, the Swedish government was "primarily interested in preserving the Scandinavian area from senseless destruction through a continuation of the war.... Himmler said he understood the point.... [Schellenberg],
April 24 Schellenberg brought Bernadotte to the Danish border at Flensburg and Bernadotte flew on to Stockholm,
April 25 Schellenberg ordered inmates in Danish and Norwegian concentration camps be turned over to Sweden [question - did the Nazis belatedly take any 'high value' prisoners in anticipation of this?],
April 26 Bernadotte returns Odense conceptually as private citizen whose "chief concern remained the prevention of further fighting in Norway and Denmark" [Schellenberg who met him and drove to Apenrade],

"Allied press [ ] publishe[s] an account of the matter..." which means something,

April 28 Schellenberg and Bernadotte to Lubeck; Himmler authorizes Schellenberg to arrange for Swedish internment of German forces occupying Norway, also internment of German forces occupying Denmark; Schellenberg returned Flensburg, arriving Apenrade next day.
April 29 Schellenberg lunch with Bernadotte and Ambassador Thomsen; drive to Copenhagen,
April 30 Schellenberg meeting with Dr.Best, then with Bernadotte and Herr von Post, following which Swedish Ambassador von Dardel gave lunch, Schellenberg returned Flensburg; drive to see Himmler now at Kalkhorst, near Travemuende - arriving 4:00 a.m. May 01.

Schellenberg is informed Hitler committed suicide, and Himmler went to bed at 3:00 a.m. or about an hour prior to his arrival.
My guess is that Himmler spent a long day holding a nuclear missile pointed at Stockholm, and an hour after Hitler cleared Norway he went to bed.

Of course Schellenberg writes very seriously without meaning any humor at all at least in this sequence, but he doesn't get Himmler out of bed. If there was no nuclear explosion the situation evidently worked out; Schellenberg informed Himmler and Doenitz had met April 30 - and they presumably worked the critical interface together, but at least in writing he lets the biggest moment in his professional life pass without particular note.

May 01 Schellenberg and Himmler to Ploen to see Doenitz, Schellenberg at least arranging to return Copenhagen,
May 02 Schellenberg continuing from Padborg in Denmark in Red Cross car,
May 03 Herr von Post and Herr Ostroem evacuating Copenhagen, Schellenberg returns Flensburg,
May 04 Schellenberg to Ploen to meet Doenitz, only to discover Doenitz relocated to near Flensburg [Muerwick]; Schellenberg reports to Himmler/
von Krosigk, later to Doenitz,

Schellenberg notes capitulation being held off by the truly heroic efforts of Army groups under Schoerner and Rendulic,

May 05 Schellenberg bidding farewell to Himmler in leaving for Copenhagen,
May 06 Schellenberg continuing on from Copenhagen to Malmo in Red Cross plane; Malmo to Stockholm/Broma in Swedish military plane [Schellenberg pointedly says "bomber" which may or may not have additional meaning],
Herr von Ostroem meets Schellenberg at airport, going to house of Bernadotte for talks with
Herr von Post and State Secretary BOHEMANN,
May 07 Schellenberg arranges to send team to Norwegian border conceptually to see if German command authority will work with him,
May 08 Team departs [Ambassador Thomsen] and returns; Schellenberg contacts
von Krosigk by telephone and hears Germans capitulated by declaration previous night.

Himmler went to bed April 30; in waiting until May 07 were they dispatching more boats south out of Norway [more flights out of Berlin] or were they just making sure the boats that had cleared got well away. I see another evacuation 'lift' toward the end of May or early June [Colby, in Norway as a young man before going on to head the CIA, suggests there was another lift with 'a big send off' - crews chanting in a Norwegian harbor], but the immediate week of the surrender is not as clear to me.

NOTE on the man who walked Himmler into exile. Chaim Herzog - diplomat, soldier and scholar, politician and journalist, lawyer and legislator - was born in Belfast, Northern Ireland in 1918. The son of the Chief Rabbi of Ireland, Rabbi Isaac Halevi Herzog (who later became the second Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel), Chaim Herzog grew up in Dublin, receiving a thorough Jewish education, while attending Wesley College. He immigrated to Israel in 1935 at age 17 to study at a yeshiva (talmudic academy) and to begin the study of law.
Herzog embarked on a long career associated with military affairs. He served in the Haganah during the Arab Revolt of 1936-39. While in London to complete his law studies (1942) he joined the British army and served as an intelligence officer in the Normandy campaign and in occupied Germany....

Go ahead and hate Himmler and Heydrich, but know the Jews were in on it beginning, middle, and end. The Jews actually protect[ed] Mengele but that takes place years after this.

Ernst Udet conceptually died on 17 Nov. 1941; Werner Vati Molders, 22 Nov. 1941; Heinrich Hitler, at least conceptually captured 10 Jan. 1942 and dead a couple months later in Soviet captivity; Fritz Todt, 08 Feb 1942; Reinhardt Heydrich 04 Jun 1942. Supposing 'the cluster' of men didn't really die. I understand how Molders [Germany's top fighter pilot], Hitler [Adolf Hitler's favorite nephew], and Todt [Germany's top civil engineer] could have deployed as an 'advance party' in preparing for a 'Fourth Reich' in exile. Heydrich - of course with his reputation as an enforcer - might have been more useful in his lesser known role of fighter pilot, in which case he and Udet would presumably align behind Molders.

The alternate possibility is that the Nazis brought outside labor into exile with them and Heydrich supervised that. Vague references suggest it might have been Russians half voluntarily fleeing Stalin, but documentation - even references in media or literature - is elusive.

"If you had been a Wehrmacht soldier at the bombed-out railroad station in Poltava, a city in the Ukraine, during the summer of 1942, you may have seen a very strange-looking military unit on the march, heading for a waiting passenger train. The unit consisted of women, all of them blond and blue-eyed, between the ages of 17 and 24, tall and slender, their sensational figures encased in striking sky-blue uniforms. Each woman wore an Italian-style garrison cap, an A-line skirt with the hem below the knee, and a form-fitting jacket with the insignia of the SS. You might have thought the SS had recruited a platoon of high-class call girls, but the truth was far stranger than that. You would have been looking at Reichsfuhrer-SS Heinrich Himmler's latest brainstorm--the Antarctisches Seidlungensfrauen [Antarctic Settlement Women or ASF]."

So wrote Russian UFOlogist Konstantin Ivanenko, as reported in UFO ROUNDUP, Volume 9, Number 3, January 21st, 2004. Ivanenko claims that the SS’s Rasse und Seidlungshauptamt (Race and Settlement Bureau or RuSHA) was the agency responsible for selecting women for the Antarctisches Seidlungensfrauen. About half of these "recruits" were Volksdeutsch -- ethnic Germans whose ancestors had settled in the Ukraine in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. The others were native Ukrainians whom RuSHA had "upgraded" to full Aryans in a process called Eindeutschung (Germanization). [‘10,000 Ukrainians’ gets talked, perhaps suggesting an element of CIA orchestration. “Station 211” is a possible designator].

The Ivanenko statement is used to lead into a so-called ‘Stargate’ paradigm, or ability to travel between worlds. We don’t know how immediate that would be, but of course the possibility suggests an alien interface with the Nazis.
Even with direction, it might take hundreds or thousands of tries before what Einstein conceptualized as a ‘wormhole connection’ is made to another Stargate, and not every Stargate is on a world capable of supporting life.

[Possible CIA media interface on the web]. Most of the worlds capable of supporting life seem to be inhabited by a human or alien culture. The exceptions tend to be uninhabited for a reason. They might be geologically unstable, lack enough water, be too close to a black hole, or pose some other danger to anyone on the surface. Assume the Nazis got lucky. Their world is safe for long term human habitation or a world with a pre-industrial human culture that has no contact with any of the various alien races. The native population might number in the thousands. Most of them make a living by growing crops, perhaps with a few specialists such as blacksmiths. How the Nazis would treat the natives might depend on the ethnic background of the natives. Anything other than an ‘Aryan’ population might be subjugated. Such a population would be a good resource in aid of the larger characters, especially if they were able to set up some kind of resistance movement.

As Ivanenko suggested, the Nazi definition of "Aryan" changed considerably over the course of WWII. Their Imperial Japanese allies were embraced as Aryans of a sort. Even the fanatical Waffen SS units were recruiting non-Germans by 1943, including Russian POWs. The Nazis were not above redefining their beliefs for pragmatic reasons and the realities of a small population supporting a growing industrial base might force them to do so. On the other hand, a die-hard SS commander might order the native population worked to death regardless of other factors.
The latter of course would be Reinhard Heydrich, but again the implication is that we’re going full bore into the scenario in suggesting the Nazis had a Stargate capability almost immediately on their arrival in Antarctica and were anticipating the subjugation of another culture from mid-1942.

Every man should respect raw intelligence. Most men respect clear organization, the capacity for unified action, and precision. This is not a good situation - forced labor is not pleasant under any circumstances, and backed by physical beatings and starvation it is particularly bad. From the vantage point of the World War II German, however, the difference between two such men might be 'the daring' or the conceptualization of a schedule or path to their end goal.

"In this connection I recall a conversation with Himmler. It was 1942, and I had just reported on our attempts to negotiate a peace between Japan and China. Hitler's original conception had been to create, with the help of Britain, a so-called "Eurafrican Space," which was to be built up as the center of resistance against the East. Finally, after 1940, recognizing Britain's refusal to reach a compromise, he transformed this conception into that of the so-called "Eurasian Space." Walter Schellenberg, The Labyrinth; Memoirs of [ ] Hitler's Chief of Counterintelligence, DA CAPO Press, 1956/1984.

Again, that citation might suggest an alien interface, with Himmler party to it and Schellenberg on the edge.

Photographs side-by-side, Todt looks like the engineer and Speer an ordinary man apparently smart enough to step back and let Werner Heisenberg make the schedule to the bomb.

1. Albert Speer met General Friedrich Fromm for lunch at Horcher's in late April 1942. Fromm said they needed a new weapon [Wunderwaffen].
2. A meeting on nuclear weapons development was held 04 June 1942 at Harnack House.
3. Speer reported on the possibility of nuclear weapons development in meeting with Hitler on 23 June 1942 [15th item on the agenda].
4. Photograph [series] is of SS Leader Himmler inspecting facility construction in Monowitz Poland on 16 and 17 July 1942.

Also in the Spring of 1942, the Germans placed a triple agent with the FBI in New York City [Alfred Meiler/Walther Kohler], who "engaged in a complex Funkspiel or 'radio game' with his German handlers" described below.

Beyond the construction the Germans were busy in it.

End of the day, I think SUNRISE or the conceptual surrender of German troops in Northern Italy was really the mechanism by which the Germans [certainly including SS Captain Guido Zimmer, SS Colonel Eugen Dollmann, and SS General Karl Wolff] smuggled at least ONE finished weapon over to Allen Dulles in Switzerland and on to the United States who subsequently dropped it on Nagasaki.

The really interesting thing is that they must have had more than one [their deal with Dulles was presumably based on their making more than one]; indeed, its possible German production significantly surpassed American production which limped along with only a single finished weapon and demonstrator engineering device in the summer of 1945.
Who knew? Roosevelt and Stimson for sure, almost certainly Eisenhower which is why he kept the Dulles brothers in place when he was president, maybe Bradley. Churchill and de Gaulle, but apparently they never told Truman and definitely not men like Patten.
Heisenberg visited Krakow in November or early December of 1943, presumably either solving a final problem or watching production begin with an eye on the purity of the output which apparently exceeded all expectations; one of his students [Erich Bagge] perfected the isolation/separation method for the Germans. That is pretty funny; for all you hear of the Manhattan Project, the Germans killed us in production - truly an engineering triumph.

The German Atomic Bomb, David Irving, Da Capo, 1967 [Simon & Schuster] at page 284. Bagge's proto-type apparatus for separating uranium-235 had been set up, together with a similar machine designed by the young Dr. Korsching, in a room of the Grotz building; it was running so well that its isotope-separation factor for a single stage was about four times better than for a single stage of the gaseous diffusion adopted by the Americans.
His "isotope sluice" had had a checkered career; twice bombed out in Berlin, and three times evacuated, it had begun its final trials only in those last few days. The ugly bottles of uranium hexafluoride had been sent across by the I.G. Farben firm, and experiments were about to begin....

In fact it now looks like that excerpt isn't entirely true, though I have a tough time quantifying how much material the Germans did have. If the Nagasaki bomb was German of course they had all that and more, assuming they didn't give their only device to the Americans and didn't even put all their eggs in one basket [would that be a matter of evacuating capability on different U-Boats, or evacuating partially by air and partially by boat].

Also of interest. In 1941 Werner Heisenberg offered Niels Bohr a deal to avert the bomb. Bohr turned him down. Six months later Heisenberg knew he was lucky Bohr had. The Germans made subsequent offers though, and now it isn't clear if those were 'disinformation' or meant to be misleading.

The American people think of Vietnam as having been a very dirty war, but World War II was certainly no less corrupt. My father nearly had his feet frozen off in the so-called 'Battle of the Bulge,' but really that whole German offensive turns out to have been an orchestrated pre-CIA adjudication mechanism allowing the Nazi government to bargain for their survival and perpetuate situational dominance.

To the extent the Jews were in on that, the situation can't help but undermine the conceptual Holocaust Imperative. "Never Again" my ass - "On Schedule" is more like it. AIDS, stealing the wealth of the Palestinians in the Intifada[s], bombing Lebanon, racketeering in Iraq including with Iran - all of this has gone too far.

Widely misunderstood, Hitler actually was a wounded soldier which virtually nobody denies. Our Veterans Administration has impossible regulations trapping really crippled soldiers in a bureaucratic nightmare. That isn't our Generals. That is the Bush Administration, it may also be a CIA plan, and knowing he is conspiring with people he otherwise calls "terrorists" to cripple our soldiers in the first place, I do not know how anybody can respect George Bush.

Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg once stated that "The Dulles brothers were traitors." Some historians believe that Allen Dulles became head of the newly formed CIA in large part to cover up his treasonous behavior and that of his clients. Christian Dewar, Making a Killing

Just before his death, James Jesus Angleton, the legendary chief of counterintelligence at the Central Intelligence Agency, was a bitter man. He felt betrayed by the people he had worked for all his life. In the end, he had come to realize that they were never really interested in American ideals of "freedom" and "democracy." They really only wanted "absolute power."
Angleton told author Joseph Trento that the reason he had gotten the counterintelligence job in the first place was by agreeing not to submit "sixty of Allen Dulles' closest friends" to a polygraph test concerning their business deals with the Nazis. In his end-of-life despair, Angleton assumed that he would see all his old companions again "in hell." Michael Hasty, Paranoid Shift

Citations off the Cory Panshin website, the larger situation is somewhat more complex than that but the treason of the Dulles brothers is clear.

Werner Heisenberg arrived in Zurich to see his old friend Paul Scherrer within a day or two of the onset of the last great German offensive of World War II.
....Chance and Paul Scherrer's invitation brought Heisenberg to Zurich that day, when Rundstedt looked unstoppable.... With him was his friend Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker [who's father was then German ambassador to the Vatican separately linked to Allen Dulles]. The two men thought of themselves as physicists come to talk physics; they traveled with no aides or bodyguards, carried their own luggage, stayed in an ordinary hotel, made no secret to Swiss friends of where they were living and working. Heisenberg's War, Thomas Powers 1993 at page 394.

During his visit to Zurich in December 1944 a rumor circulated that the physicist [Heisenberg] had come with a political purpose - perhaps to float some kind of "peace feelers." The details of his coming and going, like the original invitation itself, have been lost.... But there is evidence enough to assemble the skeleton of his visit:
the OSS knew of it from Scherrer as early as October, perhaps sooner;
Heisenberg wrote Scherrer in late November 1944 to say he would be coming about December 15 [essentially dating the Bulge Offensive],
he spoke at the physics seminar on December 18;
he had dinner one evening at Scherrer's home, probably on the 23rd,
and he left Zurich in time to spend Christmas with his family in Urfeld. [Powers at 395]

....Finally, Heisenberg told Scherrer that a month earlier [November 1944] the chief of German nuclear research, Walther Gerlach, had suffered a "nervous breakdown." Did Scherrer trust Heisenberg? The best answer is that he did - after the visit of December 1944. [Powers 397].

The ULTIMATE success of the German nuclear program must have been keeping it secret from Walther Gerlach, unless his 'breakdown' really was a case of the last minute jitters. But as for the Dulles brothers? Swine. Our admiration for the Germans grows commensurate to their disgrace and increasingly apparent weaknesses.

An insight into the relationship between what was then the pre-CIA OSS and FBI: Spring of 1942 the Germans placed a conceptual agent in New York [Alfred Meiler/Walther Kohler] by having him 'blow his cover' to an American diplomat in Madrid. FBI held him and played him, thinking they were using him as a double agent. "He engaged in a complex Funkspiel or 'radio game' with his German handlers, sending several hundred messages over two years to Hamburg"....
Usually difficult to see given movement patterns and an inability to control exactly what happens at meetings or in a travel sequence, this is a rare 'pure' or classic example of a triple agent which can be otherwise hard to describe. In fact the guy was using the FBI to get misleading information into the structure of American government and the OSS [for that matter Leslie Groves] must have known that by 1943, but there is no indication they ever told J. Edgar Hoover in Hoover's reports to Roosevelt.
Murdered or anyway dying just before Watergate, we hugely respect and pay tribute to Hoover who appears to have done both an excellent job and his best to protect the American people - unless you did expect him to have to spy within the American government to obtain information on nuclear physics for example [which they should have given him if they did expect him to catch the rat]. CIA has always manipulated 'in-house' or anyway intergovernmental communication to suit their own ends - **** 'em now.

Tony Garippo has been apprehended in collusion with the Jew. Most likely Schiff, the alternately celebrated-joyous expansive and loathsomely venereal Toad of Toad Hall. Oh they are swine. Dating back to the New York days; if you want to 'go that road' you should have gone that road. Swine. Never stand with the friend of a Jew to your rear, because they will kill you to advance the friend no questions asked.

What is funny - we've pulled troops from South Korea, leaving them essentially naked in the face of a true 'rouge' nation threat were you to take Bush seriously. They launched their big missile on the 4th of July and blew it up thirty or forty seconds into the flight after showing us they could do it, and they 'in concept' blew off a nuclear warhead but we weren't sure they had and probably still aren't - its adjudicated half steps with the Chinese right behind them, and really the relationship with North Korea appears to be right about where we want it to be.

I don't like CIA Bill Richardson sniffing around.

If you want to be scared, know the Chinese let the North Korean activity go on understanding it will trigger calls for militarization in Japan which I mostly oppose. I recommend in-flight refueling - Japan should retrofit their commercial air fleet for in-flight refueling, and reorganize their army reserve into a capable force that trains people in applicable skills, promotes people to appropriate leadership positions, holds units together at suitable levels of readiness, and discharges people in a timely manner into a secondary 'inactive' reserve though the days of a large Japanese ground army are probably gone. Have the Japanese ever trained with the South Koreans - well, they should have an agenda of things they'd like to do if the opportunity presented itself - if the North Koreans ever threaten them with a missile again. Exactly what would they do together? In-flight refuel. It isn't easy to oppose that as militarization, but it is a critical capability I bet the Chinese would take note of.

Israel on the other hand is hugely stronger than all of its neighbors combined, and it instigates acts of conceptual terrorism to destabilize the region on purpose and get its own way. The government in Iran is the Richard Helms/Henry Kissinger government of the mid to late 1970s. Can't get much more of a fix than Richard Helms's personal attention and residency. These Jews - what do they want?

As the 'multicultural genderneutral interracial highend thin-band upper-class RULING ELITE in black SUV technocrat NGO or nonspecific government but certainly regulated government' advocacy roams the globe, corrupting political systems in the installation of women and criminal organizational structures with nothing now standing in their way.

Instead of cheating the system at the behest of the CIA and diminishing ourselves in front of the world, how about we play by the rules and bring an Italian man in at the top? How about that?

Which the United States has never done before.

Try the Constitution. Well it turns out you can't try an Italian man exactly because the first chance he gets the Italian man will run out and collude with the Jews. That sounds like a one line joke, but it blows our whole national effort in the Middle East to smithereens for crying out loud. People take that racketeering very seriously, and we're working too hard to screw around in it.

We want Fair Trade - not Free Trade. And getting there is harder than it looks; CIA very overtly picked Putin and Hu Jintao - now we figure out they chose to attack in Japan as Clinton and Kantor were working toward an overview trade policy, and the CIA attack essentially diminished Murayama through the backdoor and set the stage for continuity in LDP rule.
Trying to stop it, Clinton held Murayama up effectively as a straw man, and the CIA/Kokka Koan iin kai/LDP alliance clobbered the crap out of him.

Her campaign for the presidency is nothing to write home about if she hasn't figured that out yet. What should she do? Articulating the problem will be a significant part of the solution.

Whether or not the Japanese were our largest trading partner across the mid1990s they certainly got the most attention, and now - continuing today February 2007 - instead of talking with all the lights and microphones on her [does anybody doubt she can flash press right now?] HILLARY Clinton is goading what has become a 'unified Asian surveillance and threat mechanism' to compete for situational dominance in Washington D.C. And they love that. Its their bread and butter. They conspire with her.

At best perhaps a way to assert their conceptually special capabilities or plain relevance, the CIA or whoever - her private surveillance mechanisms - literally instigates ground activities. At worst her people are racketeering in civil court processes and trying to sour a case immediately at the bar. Reading this somewhere else you may get the impression there's not a lot going on in some of these government offices here in Washington D.C., with your jobs going overseas and smirking Asians pitching these chumps in 'special relationships' and deference to cultural abstractions. Swine.

What does peace in the Middle East really look like.
We still have East Jerusalem [red] and Israeli activity along the border [blue] to work. Do you want the King of Jordan to put a line of troops in East Jerusalem[?]; ending the activity/check points blah blah blah that isn't now behind the wall is probably a lesser question. Make them cease all the activity and pull their stuff or leave it [maybe rent it as an absent owner], and in some locations the wall itself needs to be revisited.

I think the tunnel between Gaza and the West Bank is half a mile down - even if somebody did smuggle pretty darn big nukes into the tunnel a blast would only crater the surface. The highway needs to be at least four lane divided - maybe six lanes divided, as you can see 'internationalizing' the Golan Heights.
The Jews built their wall, and now they have to live behind it.
Hamas, Jewish tool 'the Israelis now don't want to acknowledge' [blatant ever since Efraim Halevy was placing leadership via attacks undermining the King of Jordan] never recognizes Israel's 'right to exist.' They just promise that NOTHING goes over the wall, and the Israelis promise NOTHING - not radiation, not commercial manipulation - comes out.
The old Mayor Daley scheme for segregating neighborhoods using highways, and no Palestinian is ever more than an hour from the seashore. Bus in the morning for the children. Big damn highway with express lanes. Seashore. Tyre.

Everybody knows the government killed Martin Luther King. If you want to be contemptuous of the American people go ahead - if the CIA killed King, of course they controlled the riots and burn pattern afterwards which further divided the neighborhoods. Straight on. No doubt.
Question[s].
A. So-called 'Devil's Night' or the burning in Detroit before Halloween. Was that done in anticipation of CIA attacks on the auto industry [Kirk Kerkorian at GM and now Alan Mullaly from Boeing sending Ford manufacturing overseas]. That burning might have been/probably was CIA, and like a bunch of little kids the ghetto hoods eagerly joined in on it never realizing they were slitting their own throats.
B. Rodney King. Did they stack a jury in anticipation of the rioting. Supposing they did, some though not all of the burning and destruction must have been targeted.
Is it possible to 'reverse engineer' what their targets were?
Did they deliberately stage the truck driver getting pulled out of the cab and spiked in the head? Painful to watch.
Did they otherwise use news cameras to mitigate the unintended effects of the rioting, diminishing that which they didn't want while permitting that which they did. Its an interesting situation [these are interesting questions], but they don't automatically enhance your respect for the mass of people who were pretty apparently manipulated. There was talk at least in LA - maybe Detroit - about upper middle class people acquiring hand guns which I support, but really you're doing that in opposition to the CIA and their plume of criminal activity [it actually is a pure Second Amendment application] which most people don't understand.

In a bigger picture, where do you think that came from? Unfortunate, the manipulation has so favored the Israelis we have to just end it in the Middle East. The idea is to clearly divide neighborhoods and ultimately remove the possibility of fighting.

No doubt, the economy in Ireland and people with jobs broke down the IRA, the British police never did. They're not holding Palestinian tax receipts - when they're serious about peace, the Jews will be slipping a little extra in but there is no fairy tale with happy endings. Disarm? Why would you disarm? Baghdad or Beirut [CIA riots in LA] - you just want people to stop killing each other.

Would it help the Middle East to have Syrians and Jordanian military guys breezing around in white Jeep Wranglers with the tops down. Jaunty. As they also deal with the Iraqi refugee problem on their other border.
Tony Garippo WAS going to work exactly those issues with the American ambassador - our guy on the ground, a 20-something year Air Force vet fluent in Arabic maxed out at E-9 running a contracting section who has essentially done this same type of thing before.
I theorize that if you really want to impact Iran, start buying custom handmade Iranian carpets in big sizes. 9x14. Those things must be incredibly labor intensive. Retail you can get them for about six grand, and a Ford Ranger costs about eighteen grand. Is it possible to swap a new Ford Ranger for three carpets, essentially setting up small Ford dealerships/truck rental franchises in the Kurdish area of Iran[?]. Questions remain.

BUT right off the bat Tony Garippo goes off colluding with the Jews. Put a match in gasoline. Blair is out, and Bush is out too. They are out, and no - its not half steps after that. Lives, fortunes, and sacred honor - people have too much at stake to play little kid games. How much trouble are the Jews in? Lebanon last summer was not helpful and people are pissed off about it. I can't tell if it immediately pissed off the New York Jews, or if it pissed off the Europeans and their rage at the betrayal is now having an impact on the New York Jews.

Israel is now the obstacle, back-dated at least to the Intifada which effectively confiscated Palestinian middle class wealth.

Let us talk reality. There is no combination of air forces in the Middle East which the United States cannot fly through to resupply Israel in the event of war. Thirteen aircraft carrier groups. We can probably outnumber never mind outgun them, plus we bring formidable anti-aircraft capabilities to the region, some of which we've already given Israel.
Get whatever munitions we have in Israel OUT.
Remove the munitions.
Whatever wasn't dropped on Lebanon last summer - get it OUT NOW.
NICKLEGRASS gone.
With some legitimacy, uninvolved and certainly targeted parties can claim the United States was behind the bombing of Lebanon last summer,
and its a fair bet the Mossad and CIA arranged the border incidents and kidnapping of the two soldiers to being with. Sure thing if they're implanted with neuroprosthetics or other radiation-based technologies.

Northrop M2-F3, testing the "behavior of wingless aircraft at speeds of up to Mach 1.61 and altitudes of 22,000 meters [73,000 feet]."
In this version anyway launched in flight from a B52 bomber; 16 flights from July 1966 to May 10, 1967 when it crashed, following which it was rebuilt and flown 27 more times until being retired in Dec. 1972.

Only it wasn't exactly 'retired.'

Evidence Points To Secret U.S. Spy Plane, Roy J. Harris Jr., Wall Street Journal 04 Dec 1992 page B6.
[subtitled] Magazine Suggests Aircraft Has Flown Mach 8 [5,280 mph] For Years on LIQUID METHANE, triangulating on taking SR-71 out of service [SR-71 Mach 3.3 or 2,193 mph] and an unexplained budget line item in 1984.
With 'Scramjet,' NASA Shoots For Mach 10, Guy Gugliotta, Washington Post, Nov 10 2004 page A1.
NASA X-43A at 110,000 ft above the Pacific at Mach 10 or 7,200 mph on HYDROGEN. Scramjet is supersonic combustion ramjet, meaning it takes oxygen from the atmosphere rather than carrying it like a rocket.
My notes say "Pegasus rocket booster,' but it is[was] experimental and I thought it actually launched as a parasite off a B-52 in flight.

Pictured is the M2-F2 to M2-F3 evolution, with the 'six million dollar man' crash in the middle [apparently the film of what was at least conceptually an 'accidental' crash was used in the t.v. show]. Remember when $6 million dollars seemed like an enormous amount of money[?].
Span 2.9 m [9ft 7in]
Length 6.8 m [22ft 2in]
Height 2.5 m [8ft 9in]
Weight 4,500 kg [10,000lbs]

Notes:
1. An induced image sequence featured units much like this only quite a bit LONGER. Tough to estimate how long; they [the ones I saw] were painted a uniform deep Army green. I don't remember what the tail configuration looked like.
2. The only serious or viable parasite/drone fighter/bomber or 'in flight vehicle launch' research that I ever heard of was undertaken by the Nazis in preparation for their evacuation to the South Pole. Is this - or the longer modern vehicle I 'saw' - at least equivalent to what they developed[?].

Has the jury reached a decision on so-called 'composite' skin[?]. Boeing JSF had a multi-layer fiberglass 'batwing' made in kind of a monolithic pour process. Of course they didn't get the job.
Inside tip - flying saucers at the South Pole do feature at least fiberglass-like if not true composite skin, so the issue isn't going to go away but on the other hand it wasn't clear to me the saucer I saw was intended to batter through a highstress environment.

12 Feb 2007
Cheating in sports may be the most shocking thing [all right, slaughtering the Amish school girls was the most shocking but it wasn't common while cheating in professional sports is pervasive and they have safeguards you assume to prevent it rather than enhance it], and killing people with AIDS is probably the saddest thing [because it is both hugely unfortunate and widespread], but getting the CIA out of the economy is going to be the most important thing facing government once George W. Bush is removed from office.
1. The industry takes great pride in saying the majority of Americans own stock or are involved in the stock market including through mutual funds.
2. Before Reagan, a couple companies used to re-state earnings every year - by the end of his administration, hundreds of companies a year were doing it.
3. [The] Non-scandal of CEO pay, Rich Lowry, Washington Times, February 7 2007 page A15. As the Economist magazine puts it, CEOs had been paid like bureaucrats; now they are paid like entrepreneurs.... New York University finance professor Roy C. Smith points out that in the second half of the 1980s, 25 percent of the mergers were hostile takeovers. In the 1990s, such takeovers declined significantly. "One reason?" he writes. "There were fewer under-performing companies remaining"..... [T]he National Bureau of Economic Research argues, "The sixfold increase of CEO pay between 1980 and 2003 can be fully attributed to the sixfold increase in market capitalization of large U.S. companies during that period."

Are those three points related, and to what extent were[are] they CIA-instigated[?]. We aren't going to feign naivety, are we? - or put another way, we can't credibly feign naivety. I don't think the market is significantly overvalued, but I think it would have been if Social Security was privatized [which I very much opposed].

Quickest fix might be to tie executive compensation to dividend rather than valuation, but it will also be necessary to see if they made money available under Reagan after choking the supply back under Carter. Did big merger guys have CIA designators - did the CIA make money in what appears to have been a unification process[?].

Among professionals, how did Bush really justify his privatization scheme[?]. He didn't say the market was undercapitalized, did he? He just said the executives would get more pay. I have wondered if these big value companies will be able to consistently produce the cash in dividend Â– I encourage people to own stocks, but you shouldn't have to sell them to make money. Does talking about this equate to saying the emperor - or the decider as the case may be - isn't wearing any clothes?

The second most important thing and a related step is figuring out what the CIA has done in civil and criminal law, and then figuring out how to mitigate that. Department of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 596. In September 1979, respondent Washington Post Co. filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, requesting certain documents from petitioner United States Department of State. The subject of the request was defined as "documents indicating whether Dr. Ali Behzadnia and Dr. Ibrahim Yazdi ... hold valid U.S. passports"..... Petitioners' affidavit, from the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs, explained that both Behzadnia and Yazdi were prominent figures in Iran's Revolutionary Government and that compliance with respondent's request would "cause a real threat of physical harm" to both men [at 597].

In other words, those people over there who Bush is threatening to attack may very well be CIA from the Helms-era now thirty-something years ago and you still can't ask about it even as he lines the bombers up and maybe sends them across the border with or without your permission. How do you know Bush didn't coordinate arresting the Iranians with Hezbollah before he did it; hell, for all you know they had a two day conference, the upshot of which was putting choice Iranians exactly where Bush needed them to be.
But again, the foreign policy aspect of that is trivial next to the domestic economy and what effectively is a regulatory mechanism.
Was the little old lady who sued over McDonalds coffee being too hot CIA-orchestrated[?].
Was that down in New Mexico[?], well, even if it was that would have happened long before CIA executive Bill Richardson ran for governor so it probably was not related. The case led to all kinds of preventive activity and effectively represents a regulatory regime - to the point where some schools don't let kids run on playgrounds.
Perhaps more widespread in targeting a single industry, my guess is that they - the CIA - decided to knock medical specialties out of some areas, and the question is whether they were consistent in using tort lawyers to do it, or, perhaps more likely, they undertook to instigate the accident or conceptual 'mal-practice' to begin with, then deployed the lawyer, worked to get it in front of a hostile judge, and ultimately stacked the jury on a case-by-case basis, acting where they saw opportunity. Throw in some media manipulation and threatening looks at the regional insurance authorities. Would a state be able to counterattack against automobile insurance companies, telling them that if they want to sell auto insurance in the state they also have to offer medical malpractice or participate in some kind of malpractice pool coverage?

It kind of goes without say that if you can get Bush out nobody else is going to invade Iran - so Joe Lieberman fights for Bush, but as our guys are emptying out of Iraq we need to bring our Vietnam-era POWs home from Southeast Asia. The abandoned/infected/rejected - that effort was not helped by people kissing Henry Kissinger's ass when he came to testify. I speculate he and George W. Bush dye their hair white - they enjoy racketeering too much to go naturally gray so they age it. Bring the POWs home. Understand mitigating CIA penetration of the economy will be iterative, and its important to plan for a sustained effort. Force Bush out. Andrew Bestor

13 Feb 2007
Returning to the question - is the market undercapitalized? No. If the companies can't make dividend its the opposite - overvalued - but that really is a matter of bringing them back to 'the dividend habit.' If Bush had privatized Social Security [an idea first floated under Clinton and Rubin], where was the money going to go? I think it was intended to go into foreign companies - they were going to try to internationalize the New York Stock Exchange on your Social Security.
Is Senator Clinton talking this on the campaign trail?

Is that why Senator Clinton wanted to represent New York in the first place?
East Coast / West Coast urbanization with flyover paradigm be damned - they're going hogs to the trough New World Order in the markets. Long before the emerging economies can meet the requirements [bribery significantly outweighs taxes in Mexico, a truly optimal paradigm for the usage-based neocon economist] and as our own SEC heads to obscurity with the questioning - and bust - on Martha Stewart as their last great claim to fame. She is a pretty sharp lady, caught doing a pretty stupid thing. That was a setup, wasn't it? So they boosted her stock up front and sold it short or something, but made her one of the richest women in the United States for a year or two? I don't doubt she was hitting people - landscapers - with cars; being a tool in a CIA fundraising structure is probably a nerve wracking experience.

With George W. Little Kid and his privatized Social Security - that was people's retirement. What an ***hole. That was old people saving and trusting in the system.

Is there any backdoor tax this guy won't seize and take to the fullest extent possible? This big government, intrusive government, backdoor taxing government maniac - with Senator Clinton kind of peripherally in the picture as the if they had been planning to internationalize the New York Stock Market which we don't know for certain but if politician appealing to the nurture whore / crisis whore paradigm Bush alienated? With each of them speaking to 'faith'; the now totally discredited faith arguments of pirates drunk in a blood-lust power lineage rampage.
American people buy Japanese cars - its a free country.
American automobile manufacturers racketeering in planned obsolescence and crappy designs - as Bush sought to privatize the Social Security by funneling money into the stock market and all the old people who own shares in automotive [never mind people with healthcare from those companies] hoping Ford and GM were going to have hit models this year. What an ***hole the guy is.

New CEO from Boeing is going to send Ford manufacturing overseas as Toyota sets up in America making pickup trucks which is a market they never used to compete in - isn't that cute? Isn't that just multi-ethnic and gender neutral and warm? And you wanted old people to put their Social Security money in that? You let Bush speak of it and you didn't immediately ridicule him on national television? You get campaign donations, but haven't forced him out yet?

On the anniversary of the Golden Dome shrine bombing [Samarra], Baghdad car bombs kill 80, The Examiner, Feb 13 2007 page 17. Bush and everybody in on that are swine.
What should we do? After blood-purging the CIA; literally getting Army torturers to make them stand outside naked at night with sections of 50 USC 401 et seq. rudely shoved up their ass - after that?
Air Force is talking about in-flight refueling as their highest priority. It may be their most immediate need but I don't think it is their highest priority. A hundred twenty odd high tech spy planes maybe at Ellsworth [the so-called Aurora] have a stunning high speed capability beyond what petroleum-based fuel mixtures can be optimized to provide, and I would bet big in tech. I would not build the Joint Strike Fighter, because its a 'jack of all trades and master of none' airplane, but redesign a whole new fighter program even though the F-16 and F-18 are still leading edge.

Have the Air Force mod late model used commercial planes for in-flight refueling and for an interim weapons platform as we look at the next generation bomber which may still be twenty years out, but really focus on an entirely new paradigm in air and space. That may or may not be the most immediate need, but it is the highest priority. We're a nation of the future - we aren't suppose to be a nation of 'CIA-fixed stock markets.'

It is shameful that civilians conceptually had a 'space plane' before the military [though I hear or rather 'see' that wasn't the case in reality; one of the supposed 'test bed' units at National Air & Space Museum represents a successful configuration in at least limited service]. Rome rotted from the inside out; we got new sidewalks on Capital Hill as the school boilers burst. Is the CIA screwing the public schools here in Washington D.C.? Make them stand outside naked at night [publicly identify them, stop what they're doing, get rid of them], but beyond that we have to move passed it. Bush is Old World Order and corruption oriented. Force him out, but really we should have run him over by now or brushed him aside in moving forward full speed ahead.
Andrew Bestor

NOTES
Word has it the Air Force doesn't want to do the tanker mods in-house, and certainly not at Tinker. I would open an alternate repair/mod facility in North Dakota or Great Falls Montana. Keep the big airframes out there. Pendulum has swung out too far to the contractors and the military needs to start doing some of their own work. Their ability - and willingness - to do that will bring down prices; they could order packetized systems and assemble their own fighters for instance [eighteen United Auto Workers in a California hanger assembled the Boeing JSF demos - paperless. Entirely off p.c. screens]. We don't need the big contractors to do assembly. We should move work out to the Dakotas and Western Nebraska / Eastern Montana trying to mitigate a potential alien issue, and the Air Force will be at that interface anyway. So its a mod shop and maybe not immediately a fighter unit[s].

Save/spend the big money on the real meal - the technology is what will make or break you. Inflight refueling you have to have but only its absence is going to win or lose a war for you [overstating the case - there's probably a whole science to fuel allocation and strategizing].

All right, you have the mod shop. You're looking at a weapons platform [maybe a 777 airframe with pressurized ejection port and rotary storage for cruise missiles], and you're feeding inflight refueling mods through as budget allows.
Use this to resource level the cyclical budget process. Got a little cash - see a late model/low cycle 757/767 cheap in an airline reorganization? Things get slow - drop guys down to Tinker. Could suppliers support two hangers/eight to ten mods a year? Tinker is going to oppose it, fearing a drain on them but I argue the opposite - I would not increase the size of the Marine Corps over Iraq and Afghanistan but I would definitely increase the maintenance MOS numbers in the Air Force as a mechanism for fighting the contractor pricing down. A lot of that is attitude - make them know you can do it and have guys eager to do it. Sure there's some promotion slots. Eighteen United Auto Workers assembling the JSF. Two squads of guys in a barn? You're crazy if you don't do it.

Marines need something to replace the Harrier. Well, they might want Marines to assemble a couple planes as a start-to-finish Marine event. These United Auto Workers were competent mechanics and their lead guys may have been 'pick' but it wasn't a special team endlessly trained in the particular airframe [which hadn't existed until Boeing just invented it anyway] and there was no paper. It was off a computer screen. That actually is a fairly immediate need - what are you going to do for the Marines if you don't go JSF? Do they like JSF - can they buy new Harriers cheaper as an interim step? They must have the STOVL JSF; part of the attraction probably is them just wanting to get the hell away from Harriers.

Inflight refueling mods as you go; watch the airlines try to target sales by bribing procurement officers.

I very much oppose the so-called 're-militarization' of Japan, but when I was over there 1992~1996 the situation was chaotic and needed some kind of organization.
The Kobe earthquake relief was not handled very well; the disaster was just smaller than Katrina and the Japanese wanted to get back up again as opposed to being kept flat by government orchestration as happened to New Orleans. National Guard American years ago [under Reagan] meets a Japanese 'reservist.' Electrical foreman running a gang on a construction site wasn't an NCO after twenty something years, and all they did was meet for a weekend in the summer for rifle practice and a few formations [instruction in something]. And they had drinking.
The days of a large Japanese ground Army are past - what they need are fighters to defend the islands and inflight refueling capability, the latter point being very difficult for the Chinese to oppose.

How concerned are the Japanese about Taiwan? Why decide now - some of their commercial planes maybe on that route just have an inflight refueling capability is all.
Realistically we probably don't need as much capability as we have for ourselves - the issue is Taiwan and to a lesser extent South Korea.
North Korea test fires another missile? One of the Japanese airlines has the largest 767 fleet in the world. One of their planes departs from a scheduled flight plan and refuels a couple of fighters over the Sea of Japan. Maybe they refuel South Korean fighters. No big deal.
[In a very calculated or deliberate move, Britain never gave Hong Kong the vote. Taking the reverse approach, I would ask Taiwan to enact Social Security legislation and make the mainland try to match it].
Retrofit a couple Israeli El Al airframes for inflight refueling if you want, but they are on my ****[dirt] list at the moment.

I also argue we should optimize our refueling fleet anyway - the 767 frame may be necessary some of the time, but most of the time I bet you could fly a smaller plane/capability. Make it a blended fleet of wide body and narrow body - stick with a Boeing cockpit and let guys train up to be certified for the range of planes.
Very few Army guys or Marines leave the service and continue doing exactly what they did on the inside with similar if not identical responsibilities and authorities, but Air Force pilots do. Should we significantly step up our 'deployed reserve' activity in the United States, renting gates at some of the smaller civilian airports, buying commercial fuel at some standard government rate, and having them takeoff on refueling missions or military transport missions? Literally switch your hat? Thinking out loud is what a blogspot is for.

Kobe Bryant spotted Gilbert Arenas 60 points in December [Wizard all-time franchise high], setting up the rematch in Washington D.C. and a potential longterm box office draw. CHEATING. 'Pathetic' is a good word - 'hollow' is another. Can't you get thrown out of professional basketball for doing that? 'Black Sox' be damned, ol' Shoeless Joe Jackson lives and plays hoop for the Lakers. When he's not playing baseball for the Yankees, who equally shamelessly threw a game to the Nationals last summer. Honest competition is the essence of success - these people are all high end socialists with big money agents papering over the 'legalities' implicit in our understanding of the game. It isn't trivial - they're flushing our society down the tubes? Who 'they'? Exactly who?

Philip Anschutz controlled a railroad [Union Pacific].
He started installing fiber-optic line along the railroad right of way[s] and called it Qwest[ongoing from 1996-1998].
I bought shares, and got slammed when the price crashed.
In September 2004 the Navy dismantled their antenna system at Clam Lake Wisc. and Gwinn Mich. which they had used for communicating with submarines.
In January 2007 I met an American soldier who served in Iraq at an anti-war demonstration. He was in communications, I started talking about the old PRC-77 from years ago when I was in, and he said they've gone commercial. Fiber-optic. In fact some deployed soldiers wished they'd kept the radios as backup because the satellite infrastructure was not entirely in place.
Does the Navy now communicate with submarines off the Qwest network of fiber-optic cables, is the stock artificially under-valued, and did I get caught in a CIA pump-and-dump scheme, encouraged to buy and hold shares as they pulled money out much as Ken Lay apparently got caught at Enron?
SWINE. SWINE.

Were they able to orchestrate media in support of the pump-and-dump, if that is what it was? How long does Mr. Anschutz expect me to have a sense of humor about this? What contracts do they have beyond the Navy[76 Hz or very low frequency]; is there some application in space? Is Mr. Anschutz - a wealthy man - planning on discussing these emergent issues with shareholders who might be less immediately wealthy?

In fact the situation is much worse than just the technology issue or stock manipulation [bad as that is]:
1. Anschutz owns the L.A. Lakers and Kings which gets into the CIA macro corruption paradigm [the corruption of the entire society beyond the economy roughly commensurate to his support for 'directed' religion], and
2. he owns a large movie theater chain [once you have the society neutralized, a means of indoctrinating it conceptually forward].
Will Smith as Chris Gardener in Pursuit of Happiness which some cities are taking homeless men to see; unfortunately the whole scenario was probably an artifice.

Dan Snyder is similarly owner of the Washington Redskins and 'framed' as the owner of Six Flags amusement parks which he bought into with the imposter Bill Gates; perhaps we can begin to generalize in viewing these situations as a 'CIA wealth nexus corruption' paradigm.

That we have not been able to force Bush out is just unbelievable; the implication is that however damaging they understand it to be, both Snyder and Anschutz are firmly 'on board' the CIA express to 'The New World Order' which I have elsewhere claimed is just the bare knuckles 'Old World Order' taking extreme measures to preserve or really enhance its situational dominance [old news] blatantly at the expense of the less fortunate [stunning and egregious]. Bare knuckles or stab in the back; unfortunate for Hillary Clinton-types, a significant aspect of the problem is the government fighting for relevancy as evidenced by first the deliberate ruin of the inner city school systems, followed by No Child Advance Unmonitored and now Privatization.

Yes/No question: does Robert Bobb, president of the District of Columbia school board, have a CIA affiliation. Did Anthony Williams; there have been at least instances of the CIA killing children in Washington D.C. [recent] whether or not they have a specific designator [with nomenclature and project number] or advocacy for it.

Starting in the Watergate-era, Hillary Clinton and Justice Breyer engineered the CIA overthrow of Nixon who apparently was not willing to play along with the larger CIA manipulation agenda, Clinton continuing in government through distributing crack cocaine and arresting the male Negroes in the great CIA crack versus powder controversy which at least in retrospect looks very deliberate indeed, passed initiating the CIA effort radiating the Negroes with William Barr [CIA ex-Attorney General of the United States] using cell phone equipment, to now disbanding the public school system.

Does Senator Obama have a similar longtime CIA affiliation[?]. 'Community activist in Chicago' is kind of circumstantial evidence to the effect he does; Martin Luther King appears to have 'gone over' and Jesse Jackson is most likely even firmer in it which gets into his half brother hiring guys to kill a business partner maybe in North Carolina. Standing in front of the White House with my protest sign, a CIA guy assured me with utmost sincerity that when Bush does get forced out there will be trouble in the ghetto and gang leader Jeff Fort [is he in prison in Texas?] will be a part of it. Der Dolchstoss. With the wealthy people all in on it. It is also unbelievable - and a damn shame - more CIA people don't commit suicide, but really there is no honor among thieves, pious hiding in their 'need to know' and government pensions. The Jews were killed with gas and burned for the sake of the German soldiers who didn't like simply shooting them and throwing them in mass graves, not because that was initially seen as the best way to do it.

How does Mr. Anschutz manage to think of himself as a religious man? Why isn't he reporting on this blogspot in his Washington D.C. newspaper [The Examiner]?

UPDATED URGENT ON SENATOR BIDEN

Biden Attacked

They already took Feingold and Bayh out of the 2008 race in making way for Clinton and Obama; is Biden next?!?

****ing surveillance elements - JEWS or Asians [slightly less likely] - STILL are not letting the graphic post [upload] - January 25 2007 [now 26 JAN 07]. As a matter of routine, penetrating cyberspace in government buildings.
Taking a minute to run warrantless private surveillance with government equipment on an American citizen in front of the Asian covert intelligence mechanisms in the Hart Senate Office Building after lunch 01/25/07. Utilizing the Capital Police. I'm sure it seemed like a fine idea at the time.
Who would do something stupid like that? Unbelievable, it looks to have been Democratic staffers on the terrorism subcommittee, or even worse, on the Constitution subcommittee, with offices overlooking the Calder in the Hart atrium.
SWINE. Swine. They work for bin Laden, and suck in blind lock on the nurture whore /crisis whore paradigm big government money terrorism tit.
In previous lives, they may have worked for Jamie Gorelick.

Seventeen currently-seated United States Senators are implanted with invasive neuroprosthetics [based on a CIA MKULTRA Subproject 119 design].

Electrodes on the surface of the brain AND HYPOTHALAMUS.

Senator Joseph Biden [D-Del] is rumored to be one of the Senators.
Particular media sources are critical of his unrestrained proclivity for verbal introspection. Including in public committee meetings.

No Resolution to Biden's Talk Show; [FINAL Edition], Dana Milbank. The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: Jan 25, 2007. pg. A.2

Chairman Joe Biden of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was trying to uphold two resolutions yesterday: one criticizing the Bush administration's Iraq policy and the other Biden's own resolution to himself -- to stop talking so much.
The Iraq resolution passed 12 to 9. Biden's other resolution failed, by a voice vote -- Biden's voice.
The Delaware Democrat and presidential hopeful ran the hearing more like a talk show host than a chairman: inviting the other senators to speak and then commenting on each senator's remarks.
He opened the hearing with a 3,000-word statement in which he used the word "I" 88 times, including a lengthy discussion of the types of questions he has asked himself and how he has answered himself. Finally, the committee's ranking Republican, Richard Lugar (Ind.) got a chance to speak. Then Biden spoke again. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) introduced an amendment. Biden interrupted him four times, the last time stating, "I don't want to belabor the point."
By this point, Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.) had heard enough Biden. "We're going to be here a long time, and I'd certainly like to speak," he announced with irritation. Biden yielded the floor to Sununu, but then interrupted him, too -- five times.
"Senator," Sununu eventually pleaded. "You've had a wonderful opportunity to express your views. I think many on the committee would at least like to express their own views, and I'm sure you'll have ample opportunity to respond."
For Biden, verbosity frequently tramples what might otherwise be profound points. Friends have urged him to put a sock in it, and he knows that his wordiness prevents him from being, as he has put it, "the best Biden I can be."
But, like any addict, he is prone to lapses. "I'll not interrupt again," he promised after one of his monologues yesterday -- this one after remarks by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) -- and then he broke the promise minutes later.
The veteran legislator is hardly the only one in the Senate, or on the committee, to suffer from long-windedness.....
But Biden suffers more publicly from the need to explain every contour of his thinking; he at once seems keenly aware that he should keep things moving, yet unaware of the need to stop himself from talking....

Biden battles wordiness
JENNIFER BROOKS. Gannett News Service. McLean: Jan 14, 2006. pg. 1
USA Today, a division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.
WASHINGTON -- Does Sen. Joe Biden talk too much?
Yes, said the reporters who clocked the Delaware Democrat's questions at Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's hearing with stopwatches.
Yes, said the pundits who speculated that the would-be presidential candidate's biggest political handicap might be his mouth.
Yes, said Biden himself, who went on CNN to admit he should have skipped the long-winded speeches and cut straight to his questions.
The Alito hearings should have been a place for the former Judiciary Committee chairman to shine. Here was a national forum, a chance for Biden to strut his stuff to a larger-than-usual C-SPAN audience.
It didn't quite work out that way.
First, Biden insulted an entire university. Then his long-winded questioning style drew ridicule from columnists and late-night talk show hosts.
"It's unfortunate, because in the middle of all that talking are some really interesting points that get lost," said Jennifer Duffy, political analyst for the Cook Political Report.
Biden asked plenty of probing legal questions this week, but he could also veer wildly off topic.
"I don't like Princeton," he announced to Alito, a Princeton alumnus. The next day, Biden donned a Princeton hat for the cameras and apologized.
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen devoted his entire column to Biden's gift for gab, warning that it could wreck his 2008 presidential ambitions.
"The only thing standing between Joe Biden and the presidency is his mouth," Cohen wrote in a Thursday column.....

You can do that with neuroprosthetics. Radiate someone passed the 'restraint' barrier that typically prevents them from embarrassing themselves.
Radiate someone passed the 'impulse barrier.'
By itself it is not per se a 'volitional impairment' - you can't get Biden to unknowingly vote against legislation he really wants by secretly radiating him - but it would be an annoying technique to employ in harassing someone.
Supposedly took down Phil Graham at the Washington Post after he got Lyndon Johnson on the ticket in 1960 [wouldn't be the first time they did it],
but that was apparently using drugs.

Tough to tell.

Biden - a politician - already suffers from a reduced expectation or a 'class bias' against politicians and wordiness,
he seems to suffer wordiness most at 'icon' moments or hearings which are anticipated to draw a lot of viewers and typically do [Roberts Supreme Court nomination, hearings on the Middle East],
a clever operator can do it with a deft touch that often defies explicit recognition,

and end of the day it is possible a person or person[s] unknown are radiating Senator Biden to produce the embarrassing effect and essentially trivialize American Constitutional Procedure. Taking him out of the race in 2008.

What is the answer? Oh, Democratic staffers on the terrorism subcommittee set about attacking me after lunch on Jan 25 2007 utilizing the Capital Police in the Hart Senate Office Building, apparently for lack of anything better to do. 'What swine' you say, but that's about a typical government response in Washington D.C.
Go to the FBI on somebody attacking Biden?
I don't have proof,
they would investigate me,
and they wouldn't go after the people attacking Biden but would actually use my 'crazy' allegation to open the door further for anybody who wants to take a shot at him.
What SWINE.

All right, you ***holes who won't let my graphics post [upload]. What you need to do is ransack government for an oscillator [device which detects radiation - I am sure the Navy would own a few or could direct you somewhere to get one]['double ridged' is better, and they cost about $100,000 a pop if you're civilian just buying one but that would be cheap in protecting the Senate], and mount it on the far wall of the hearing room facing where Biden sits. But you are childish swine, and it won't break my heart if you lose your jobs over this.

While our inept Homeland Security forces are focused on Arabs who are merely pissed off about CIA manipulation of their [and our] political processes. We should be so pissed. Anyway.

From the Perspective On The New World Order daily news letter Jan. 22 2007, a major bust on Bush which factors into the George W. Bush recognition sequence:

Originally backed by financier J. P. Morgan in the effort, Nikola Tesla was an immigrant research and testing scientist/engineer who built a tower out on Long Island. Planning began in 1900 [concept development began earlier than that], and he [Tesla] went out to the site full time in June 1902. Something happened - Tesla somehow uncovered a way of accessing natural energy - and 'the big guys' promptly crushed him, ultimately to die penniless and alone in a New York hotel room with 'the big guys' - almost certainly including J.P. Morgan - embargoing the methodology of his work on an ongoing basis. Still. Today. Other side of the coin - in roughly that same time period, Allegheny College graduate and 'muckraker' Ida Tarbell was attacking Standard Oil Company in McClures [published in 14 parts between Nov. 1902 and Oct. 1904]. She had a source inside the company - Henry M. Flagler, which Rockefeller knew if indeed he didn't arrange it - and from our vantage point today it very much appears a deal got cut.

It looks like the deal was for broad progress and not selective manipulation as they overtly showed the hand of Rockefeller. That appears to have been the understanding or even the trust which has now been broken with the Americans backing a military government in Pakistan which has actually reduced the standard of living since independence, and an Egyptian government much more repressive than Nasser ever thought to be. Swine.

You can't screw people too bad. J.P. Morgan would not approve of Bush and his big hoarding millionaires and billionaires ransacking this country. Swine. Bush must go.

The granddaughter of James A. Baker III got sucking into a pool drain and drowned 2002. Utmost sympathy to the family, complete and without reservation - unless it turns out that was CIA-orchestrated like the CIA-orchestrated school bus accidents and deaths of school children in accidents as part of the CIA seat-belts-on-school-buses advocacy, in which case they're all just swine. Killing your own granddaughter as a vehicle for regulating in-ground pool installation. That would illustrate how corrupt they are, or more literally, how far they've departed from reality, and even the extreme Christian right would admit that if they understood it was true. Utter swine.

Footnote: Jews as in Jewish people in the United States [pursuing Dennis Sweeney in New York as a classic example] insofar as it doesn't seem likely the cyber aspect of the surveillance originates in Israel, though of course that is possible.

Northern No Fly Zone, Southern No Fly Zone, Oil-for-Food; given the bombing of Lebanon 2006, all of that looks like a very cynical and calculated effort to confiscate Iraqi wealth and systematically grind the people down in reducing their standard of living.

Particularly when you look at the Israelis - Efraim Halevy - placing Mossad agent and Hamas founder Sheik Ahmed Yassin via a contorted scheme which compromised the King of Jordan September 1997, and other American efforts preserving the governments in Iran and Iraq in that time period.

Peter Bourne and Bill Richardson gave Saddam Hussein a then-highly classified neuroprosthetic technology in the summer of 1995. The blind can see and the deaf can hear though the CIA wont give that same technology to blind or deaf people in the United States today but is making them jump through hoops to no avail. The blind as a bigger threat to the World Order than Saddam Hussein 1995 is crazy.

Clear is that Steven Richter betrayed Iranians and Iraqis to their deaths, certainly as bad as Aldrich Ames, AND that was known in 1999.

Annals of Espionage; Saddams Best Friend. Seymour M. Hersh, The New Yorker, April 5 1999, page 32. On Steven Richter and the Richard Helms CIA orchestration in the region. [E]ventually [Richter] took over Iraqi operations as head of the Near East Division..... Renowned inside the agency as a territorial and single-minded manager..... chief of station in Amman Jordan, which was the overseas center for the CIAs coup plotting inside Iraq. Richter was a controversial manager... brilliant... ... Steven really knows his business, one colleague told me. Hes probably one of the savviest operational guys....
Hes in control, and you dont question him, [a different] intelligence officer told me. Hes driven off the talented core of Arabists.

[Maybe creating a minor controversy over how Mr. Richter spells his name; I thought it was Steven based on now dated notes from The New Yorker but may have taken it down wrong. Washington Post wrote Stephen in The CIA And the Coup That Wasn't, By David Ignatius, Friday, May 16, 2003; Page A29, which appears to be the only direct citation immediately available. References to a 'Steven' Richter associated with a software company involved in a fight with Microsoft are more common, and Microsoft - specifically Bill Gates/imposter Bill Gates - is controversial in the field. Anyway, an apology to Mr. Richter if Im wrong].

.....[A]n earlier Richter assignment, as the director of a secret operations center in Germany in the late nineteen eighties [ ] had been to collect intelligence from Iranians who were spying, at great personnel risk, inside Iran...
[which the CIA admits]
AND to destroy the spy ring in order to blind the Americans - specifically 'good' factions in the CIA - once they knew the Richard Helms agenda was being advanced
[which the CIA does NOT yet admit].

....Richter [ ] ordered the agents to double their reporting..... letters sent to Richters agents in Iran were often addressed in the same hand and mailed in batches that included the same return accommodating [CIA cover] addresses. The Iranians quickly [ ] blew the network apart. More than thirty Iranian informants were seized and put to death.
Page 39. Sometime in 1996, the CIAs Near East Division, with approval from a higher authority, had begun a separate [ ] operation inside Iraq... Richters operation.... A group of defectors from the ruling Bathist Party in Iraq.....[identified by the CIA as representing an alternative government were tricked into joining a conceptual coup] scheduled to take place that summer. The plan ended [ ] spectacular....Saddam knew all the detailed plans...and rounded up and executed scores of those involved.....

DBACHILLES was Steven Richter intentionally killing Iraqis for the CIA. They now know it and can see it; we can see that BUT BEYOND THAT we can also see the other side of the coin. We can see the 'ying and yang' so to speak; killing the Iraqis AND driving off the talented core of Arabists.

Richter probably wont deny it.
Feigning leaks to implement so-called partitioning in the first place, killing Richard Welch to stop the identification of CIA agents mid-1970s, and now eliminating the core of regional specialists circa late 1990s.

Seymour Hersh is in on it. Page 36. The first executive director of UNSCOM [United Nations Special Commission on Iraq], Rolf Ekeus, of Sweden... chose Scott Ritter ....
Page 37. Ritter [ ] envisaged a joint Israeli-United Nations signals-intelligence (SIGNIT) operation..... Whats more, Ritter wanted Washingtons permission to share U-2 reconnaissance photographs of Iraq with the Israelis.....
[T]he U-2 flights were under the direct control of UNSCOM and could not be challenged....
Page 35 [but in time sequence]. Ritter, desperate to keep the operation under U.N. control, asked the Israelis to process the telephone intercepts.....

Efraim Halevy [certainly Israeli], Scott Ritter [who wanted to be Israeli], Steven Richter dating back to IRAN CONTRA: Middle East gone to **** in the 1990s.

Bad news all at once: is The New Yorker in on this? Swine.

One poor picture, but that is only the first part of the problem. The second part of the problem is the repression they were planning, and the tools they were intending to use. Rancid Raymond Odierno, deliberately dropped in to sour the milk - he went over as a Major General and radicalized the Sunni Muslims so successfully they made him a Lieutenant General. Make the CIA stop causing trouble over there. Leave. Surge the money to cover the withdrawal. Pull the troops. Force Bush out.

Footnote on the Steven versus Stephen [Richter] spelling controversy. From Wikipedia:

Scott Richter is the CEO of Media Breakaway formerly known as OptInRealBig.com LLC. He has been accused by some as being a U.S.-based email spammer....
Richter was listed in the ROKSO top 200 spammers, but his inclusion in the list was deleted in 2005. His company once sent some 100 million emails a day. One of the most famous emails was the offer of Iraqi "most wanted" playing cards in 2003; Richter claims to have sold 40,000 decks before they were even printed....

Facing a $50 million judgment in Washington state from the Microsoft case, in March 2005, OptInRealBig.com filed for bankruptcy protection. It claimed to have assets of less than US$10 million and debts of more than $50 million. Microsoft's refusal to settle a $20 million claim based on Washington state spam law is what forced Optinrealbig to file for bankruptcy. Steven Richter, who is Scott Richter's father and President and General Counsel of Scott's company, commented "OptIn is profitable but for these lawsuits"....

CIA in spam email. No way. Well.....
CIA orchestrating particularly low class or trivializing aspects of civilian support for the war might be more likely.
Very possibly NOT AT ALL RELATED beyond an interesting coincidence in names, it would be a funny take-down were it true.

[On Raymond Odierno, here with Senator Clinton. CIA yearbook photo of football star and cheerleader].

Do you know who youre surging into? If the President does opt for continued oppression in Iraq. Rancid Raymond Odierno, who has already pissed off the Iraqis and made us more enemies. No way will they forget this guy. Fighting The Insurgency, One Units Aggressive Approach; Â‘It Looked Weird and Felt Wrong, Thomas E. Ricks, Washington Post page A1 July 24 2006 on Major General Raymond T. Odierno, man who radicalized the Sunni Muslims as an aspect of the CIA orchestrated civil war Phoenix program in Iraq. Every male from 16 to 60 that the 4th Infantry could catch was detained, he [Col. Alan King, Coalition Provisional Authority] said. And when they got out, they were supporters of the insurgency.

January 2007 it looks like that was intentional, giving us a timeframe for trying to reverse engineer the CIA phasing structure or evaluate the wars progress as a CIA activity meeting scheduling milestones.

Bush now faces the prospect of an insurgent government declaring control over Anbar province and other Sunni-dominated areas in a matter of months. The Voices on the Gallows, Jim Hoagland, Washington Post, January 04, 2007.
That guy is now one of the top generals we have over there. Hoagland argues Bush has in fact gone ahead and partitioned the country into three regions with or without the permission of Congress:
[1.] Anbar province and other Sunni-dominated areas with
[2.] the semi-independent Kurds and
[3.] the political alliance between his [Malikis] Dawa Party [ ] and the radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr over the rest.
Its almost funny; if that outcome with a generous dollop of anti-Americanism thrown in - was what you wanted, than Odierno did and continues to do a good job. Thats what the Jews wanted him to do, right? The American military defending Israel and manufacturing a role which will keep American troops on the ground over there for years. Sweet.
If, on the other hand, that is not what they were suppose to be doing - our military was not suppose to permanently alienate huge portions of the Middle East as a career objective, divide Iraq, or participate in the Israeli strategy of securing Israel by confiscation of wealth [bombing Lebanon, goading the Palestinians into Intifada or whatever], Odierno sucks, and Bush is being hugely duplicitous. Swine.
Odierno, 52, said that the U.S. military could provide only a partial solution to Iraqs problems, and that more jobs and provincial elections were key components in regaining the peoples trust in government. Baghdad Needs Iraqi Troops, General [Odierno in his own column] Says, Joshua Partlow, Washington Post Jan 08 2007.

Israel controls Hamas [as weve seen, with Efraim Halevy placing Mossad agent and Hamas founder Sheik Ahmed Yassin via a contorted scheme which compromised the King of Jordan September 1997 in an alleged attempt on the life of Khaled Mashal, Man in the Shadows, St. Martins Press, New York 2006], and CIA apparently controls Hezbollah if that organization werenÂ’t [similarly] actually founded by Richard Helms during his years in Tehran 1973~77. They can turn the violence on and off like a light switch. Syria and Iran arent destabilizing Iraq. Iran cut a deal with the CIA last summer legitimizing their influence in the southern half of Lebanon and maybe toppling the Lebanese government - do you seriously think theyre going to rock that boat over influence in Iraq which is trending their way unassisted? Partners in crime, they probably work with the CIA in Iraq as required. They may shut off the violence and claim the surge was effective, but really it was gaming all along.

Remember Robert Gates is CIA.

Allende and Pinochet circa 1973 [approx]

Why didnt Watergate represent the reform we needed at the time [in the mid-1970s], and how do we better focus on moving forward this time as Bush leaves office?
In part, the possibility of reform was then diminished by the ability of the CIA to control the debate, much as a bullfighter skillfully capes a bull, wearies it, and kills it.
Of course no one wanted those outcomes Richard Welch left dead on a lawn in Athens as a means of inhibiting the ability of Congress to identify responsible parties in the Agency as one example, Chile plunged into chaos with something like a fifteen year plume of agony as another but the CIA was willing to undertake the activity in extending their larger paradigm of situational dominance supposedly for Â‘the greater good or occasionally for private profit complementing the greater good.

How does the legislative branch resist that in the battle to regain control of the governmentÂ–in the United States. A key first step is accurately identifying problem areas.

Chile in the early 1970s is of great interest because the issues - copper as a key strategic component in alleviating the so-called energy crisis and Project Cybersyn, socialists actually with hands on control of the economy including factory production and movement of goods - continue to haunt us. CIA is still dominating them.

Copper. We are endlessly educated into thinking there is in fact an energy 'shortage' or even crisis at the behest of commercial interests in charge of extracting and refining petroleum - about a third of our trade deficit is spent on energy - when really we are constantly surrounded by energy free of charge. Attempts to utilize it date back at least to Tesla or in the purely American tradition maybe Franklin flying his kite in the storm - anyhow, somebody figured out a way to capture that free energy using copper. So far so good, but the petroleum extraction/refining interests moved to monopolize natural deposits or sources of copper in the 1970s and 1980s, previously noting Atlantic Richfield [ARCO] bought Anaconda Mining Company in January 1977 and Standard Oil of Ohio [SOHIO] bought Kennecott in 1981.
Pinochet attacked the Allende government right before Arab nations raised the price of oil following the October War of 1973 and Nixon was forced out.
Was Watergate really an operation effectively securing or institutionalizing big energy as a CIA funding mechanism worldwide, apparently with Nixon not willing to go along with it so they had to force him out? A third of our trade deficit is in energy - are we running a trade deficit with the CIA?
Simultaneous trouble in Iraq, with Iran, on the Nigerian delta, and with Venezuela - beyond the clumsy BP maintenance shutdown on the pipeline in Alaska - drove up the price at the pump last summer and allegedly killed the SUV market though I still see them around - turns out the summer crisis season was just confiscating middle class wealth in the United States.

And keeping them home, as opposed to letting them drive somewhere on vacation.

Real inside, beyond crimping the middle class down, we're wondering what the CIA - or whoever - was funding up.

Increasingly it looks possible to manufacture a range of petroleum-like products as opposed to refining crude oil from wells, liquefying coal, or distilling corn into alcohol beyond moonshine, but rather than opting for either the free energy captured with copper or the readily manufactured petroleum our country is being driven to extreme efforts at great sacrifice;
worse than that even, our government security agencies act as enforcement mechanisms for this regime of mandatory taxation and sacrifice.

Not surprisingly, George W. Bush brought the paradigm to the next level with attacks on the judiciary [at least Rehnquist] in 2004 and 2005 and the legislative branch ongoing from around that time [threats before the confirmation hearing Sep 20th 2005, Proxmire dead, one Senators wife kidnapped, another Senator in the hospital] beyond regime change in New Jersey and Connecticut across the summer of 2004. Bush never lined up congressional staffers for photographs before shooting them Pinochet was overt and Bush is subtle - but that is why Bush must be forced out. Logical or even inevitable, taking that next step is definitively why George W. Bush is such swine and sanctimonious.
Beginning with the October War of 1973 and precursor sacrifice of Allende in Chile, this is the ultimate in regulation and not free market at all.

Nixon and J. Edgar Hoover died at the same time and are hugely misunderstood public servants. People in the know are disingenuous in disparaging their service because there was opposition but it wasnt who you wished it was.

Project Cybersyn was an effort by the socialist government under Allende to assert central control over the economy, famously with 500 telex machines installed up and down the length of the country and monitored in Santiago. The control center had a mod 1970s look like something out of Star Trek but the system was only tested once by a truckers strike in 1972. CIA gets sulky when you refuse to recognize their genius, here both in installing the system and in organizing the truckers strike. Was Cybersyn the last best chance to salvage communism in Europe? Then a huge conglomerate, was it suppose to save ITT? It was a CIA project with an overview designator - how far was it intended to go? ITT supposedly opposed Allende but really they ran the effort for the CIA, and now they consider it a core specialty they bring [bought] to American defense contracting. Terminator movies, but a correction will include forcing Bush out and identifying CIA designators.

J. Edgar Hoover died when Nixon was attacked, and I increasingly think the two points are related.

Andrew Bestor

Â‘The BIG DIGÂ’ underneath Boston Harbor supposedly ran wildly over budget at $13.5 billion dollars, but fact the project was a CIA funding mechanism, Project Manager Andrew Natsios was and is CIA going on to head USAID now persecuting Negroes in Darfur, and the Agency walked with about $9.5 billion dollars. No word on the woman who died when the concrete ceiling slabs crushed her car in the tunnel.

Invading Iraq, we definitely sent the troops but we only pretended to send the money. A guess is some big contractors got funded up for other work, some buildings were built half trashed and casual, and in some instances the CIA made splash that looks expensive but really hid the transfer.

Apprehending them racketeering in the deaths of Americans DEFINITELY with the collaboration of the U.S. military command over there - most likely with counterparts here undertaking domestic surveillance and evaluation - I say to pull the troops immediately. Beyond that the entire game post-Saddam looks to have been a CIA effort at destabilizing the region for the long term commitment of U.S. ground troops, most likely to protect Israel.

Bring the Americans home.

If, on the other hand, you really want to win with this 'surge,' send the money, and only pretend to send the troops.

We have a Department of Defense to protect us, and they are awesome in their capabilities. Defending us is very different from winning fights in the Middle East, however, where our technological advantages are only of use in subjugation and repression.

Do not Palestinian-ize the Iraqis. Do not West Bank-isize Baghdad.

Israel is holding Palestinian tax receipts which everybody admits they owe giving the Palestinian Authority [without controversy - the Israelis admit theyre holding them].
If the Israelis were serious about ending the trouble on the West Bank, theyd send more money and not less, and lift restrictions rather than imposing more checkpoints as the British did in Northern Ireland.
The problem is that the Israelis in Israel and the CIA in Iraq really arent serious about peace but seek a long term game outcome that is favorable to their larger agenda.

I thought the CIA was behind the bombing in Samarra, but sources in Washington D.C. hint that it was the Israelis. Either way, they could turn the spigot and significantly reduce if not eliminate the killings in Iraq.
May pain, disease, and suffering find them and the children of them who game with ulterior motives, confiscate wealth, restrict civil freedoms, and attack the poor in those regions.

They can turn violence in Iraq on and off like a hot water spigot - their corruption and scheming in 'the great game' is why I oppose the war and want to bring the troops home now. Violence in and of itself isn't an issue beyond what they deliberately conspire in; killing our own guys for no good reason.

An English woman named Gertrude Bell campaigned to raise a King [Faisal] as the Ottomans retreated after the First World War, and she pulled it off, opposed by the father of Kim Philby [famous in a reciprocity concept with the Soviet Union post-World War II] who wanted a republic. Cairo 1921 there was a big conference which gets into Allen Dulles and Philip Graves covering up for the Jewish Protocols of Zion in Constantinople; anyway, Bell was wrong and parochial in her thinking [unless she was truly disingenuous and worried only for the English all along]. Now its the republic - though somewhat violent. Make the foreigners leave.

Bush is out, and it isn't over Romney using 'Tar Baby' in a speech to trap George Allen though that pretty accurately reflects the attitude of the Bush administration. Half the State Department slots are empty and no one notices because they're just reading CIA script and not arguing strategy anyway.

[January 10~13 2007, Washington D.C.] Here it's bogus beyond surveillance, seriously limiting free speech. They aren't letting graphics post [upload]. Who is this 'they?' We think its the Jews - or somebody quasi-officially 'infiltrating' capabilities of the National Security Agency [Bryan Adrian 1990s to mid-2006 suggested it was Jews based on his experiences and verbal confirmation from a CIA source; I suspect that is true based on an attack on Dennis Sweeney by Allard Lowenstein and a group on New York Jews across the 1970s continuing passed the conceptual death of Lowenstein in 1980 to at least the mid 1990s].

[Final comment 01/15/07 11:00 p.m. Washington D.C. Southeast]
Terrorism - bull****. Ain't a lot going on in the alleged government 'security agencies' if they have nothing better to do than sit around preventing graphics from uploading, and the FUNNY part of the situation is that yes, this probably is a higher security priority for the Israelis than hunting bombers, particularly in that most of the bombers are Israeli orchestrated anyway and they can just call those guys at home.

Ford Dole 1976.

Captain of the House with the Master of the Senate.

Sunny Soldiers; Dole was never as "dour" as media represented him. Actually, serious isn't dour anyway. With a memory, but that's experience and not a state of mind; for that matter Ford was a partisan politician and don't let anybody say different now.

G. Gordon Liddy told me that [really Liddy wrote that in his masterpiece Will].

Dole - I would say a 'Thatcher out of office' in roughly the same era - buried William Miller of Goldwater-Miller in Arlington. George McGovern, bomber pilot in the war, could have been a great example for Tom Daschle but I'm not sure how much America really missed, while on the Republican side I think there is a sense of foregone opportunity.

Time for Bob to shine. Gerald Ford wasn't about terrorism or torture or privatizing Social Security. I hope Bob Dole stands up with a populist speech out of the Depression midwest and just takes Bush to the woodshed. Maybe on Ford working his $2 dollar a week counter job, while the worst Bush ever had it he was exploratory drilling for the CIA and bringing corruption to Major League Baseball.

Heard here first. Senator Allen was significantly backed by Nixon, and he can speak very authoritatively to 'the Nixon-Ford friendship and college football paradigm.' We HOPE the Republicans do not blow this opportunity in media presentation, teamwork, and explanation of friendship on-and-off the field.

Vice President Cheney says he isn't going to run in 2008. I hope he reconsiders; anyway, Ford is dead, there will be a limited amount of maximum exposure television time to be had for free, and this ain't the moment for Vietnam/Watergate retrospectives.

POST GAME. Pathetic. Dwelled on Watergate and never even mentioned Nixon and Ford's shared passion for football. Both played, Ford only starting after sitting out two seasons second string and Nixon mostly on the bench, but interestingly, while Ford is famous for it and the 'team' analogy definitely characterizes his political career [he brought it into public life], all evidence suggests Nixon followed college football in greater detail while he was in the White House.

Origin of the Problematic Interface

2006-12-27T16:02:00.000-08:00

Could be speaking to so-called 'terrorism' - CIA orchestrated or otherwise, with the Richard Helms government of Iran slash Hezbollah and the Israelis running Hamas.
"We're doing it again. We're taking counsel of our fears, and scaring the hell out of ourselves. You shouldn't underestimate an enemy, but its just as fatal to overestimate him.....

Possibly America's greatest general.

Reflecting here the Allen Dulles betrayal paradigm.

Before The Colors Fade; Portrait of a Soldier, by Fred Ayer Jr., Houghton Mifflin 1964. From page 145. Even before Patton was unshackled, there was an immense pressure upon General Eisenhower which, in his difficult position as Supreme Commander of Combined Armies, it was not possible for him to ignore. This was the British....
Later the pressure increased. Even as U.S. forces broke crashingly out of the Normandy perimeter, Patton was fully aware of the situation.....
As it was Patton's divisions rampaged westward toward St. Lo; eastward to Brest toward Rennes, then northward through Auranches and Argentan in an attempt to seal off the escape route of the German Seventh Army at Falaise. At a crucial moment, however, his XV Corps was ordered by SHAEF [Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Forces] to halt at Argentan.... As a result, nearly half of the enemy escaped, mauled and with a huge loss of armor it is true, but alive and thus able eventually to regroup and re-equip, to fight again most effectively in the Battle of the Bulge. George Patton was angry. General Bradley was almost as angry but in a more moderate way....

Emergent, it looks like the Germans flew a heavy bomber 12 miles off New York City in September 1944, took pictures of the skyline at night, and told the Americans they'd nuke it if they weren't given a chance to 'fold down' in an orderly manner.

This is their targeting scheme and blast effectivity. 15~20 kilotons which is what we dropped on the Japanese: a number of points including the difference between the two bombs we dropped suggests one of them may have been German. Some argue the second bombing [Nagasaki] wasn't strictly speaking 'necessary' but that may have been deployed for 'other than tactical' reasons. Graphic is via Reich of the Black Sun by Josph P. Farrell.

Page 154."In every case, particularly throughout the campaign, I was under wraps from the High Command. This may have been a good thing, as perhaps I am too impetuous. However, I do not believe that I was, and feel that had I been permitted to go all out, the war would have ended sooner and more lives would have been saved. Particularly I think this statement applies to the time when, early in September, we were halted owing to the desire, or the necessity, on the part of General Eisenhower in backing Montgomery's move to the north. At that time there was no question of doubt that we could have gone through and on across the Rhine within ten days. This would have saved a great many thousand men.....

Since the witness in this case might be accused of prejudice, we should look at one who was forced to be professionally objective such as [German Major] General [Richard] Schimpf [of the 3rd Paratroop Division]. In his evaluation of the strategic situation in question he wrote:
There is no question that if your Third Army had not halted [by orders from SHAEF] before Metz in September, it would have penetrated the Seigfried Line very quickly and been across the Rhine in a short time. At that time we were powerless to cope with the situation in that portion of the front. But when your Third Army was halted, we obtained the time to regroup and we used that opportunity to the utmost.

Page 177. ....[O]n the 15th of December Field Marshal Montgomery published not his G-2's but his own personal "appreciation." It contained the following categorical language: "the enemy is at present fighting a defensive campaign on all fronts; his situation is such that he cannot stage major offensive operations. Furthermore, at all costs he has to prevent the war from entering a mobile phase; he has not the transport or the petrol that would be necessary for mobile operations, nor could his tanks compete with ours in a mobile battle." .... On the very next day the Germans without a doubt "committed" their armor [in the Battle of the Bulge].

The latter citation on Montgomery's writing can actually be typified in the New World Order orchestrated drama 'force multiplier' paradigm [Martin Luther King, "I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the promised land. And I'm happy, tonight. I'm not worried about anything. I'm not fearing any man...on the night before he died, and Bill Clinton, Bombing Crisis Proves Relevancy of Presidency, Steven Thomma, Knight-Ridder in The Salt Lake Tribune, April 22 1995, WASHINGTON - Just a day after an all-but-forgotten President Clinton felt compelled to insist that he remains relevant, the tragic bombing in Oklahoma City proves it.... [J]ust 12 hours before the explosion, his White House news conference drew the live coverage of only one of the three major television networks. "The president is relevant here," he said at that time, responding to a question; see also Disaster Allows Clinton to Show His Relevance; Oklahoma bombing thrusts him back into spotlight, Susan Yoachum, San Francisco Chronicle, April 21 1995. "In contrast to a news conference ignored by two networks less than 24 hours earlier - during which he offered an extraordinary defense of his relevancy as president - Clinton was in command and demand as news of the bombing stunned the nation...." as classic examples].

At issue is mitigating problems like the horror of AIDS and intrusive nature of government, both of which are targeted and both of which we argue here are invidious beyond reason, actually diminishing human ability in a mush of useless waste and draining void. Patton was a great general, and instead of providing him with a broader picture they conspired to choke him down with the exaggerated 'slap' issue. Swine certainly, but scary is that they are important swine who absolutely lack vision beyond conspiracy.

Violent crime was down, probably because they were radiating the ghetto. Now crime is coming back up - is somebody getting them to lift the radiation [hopefully]. The idea is that the issue needs to be brought forward and articulated with precision. The actual problem is not that Clinton did or didn't order the ghetto radiated to cut crime, but THAT IS the political problem which has kept the ghetto radiated.

This is hugely an argument to get our troops out of Iraq NOW. Pull them out. Vietnam is not a better place for our having been there and the CIA having betrayed the government in the south. China is actually more liberal and better off than Vietnam, and that is exactly a legacy of the PHOENIX program. They don't thank you nor should they.

There will be an amnesty in Iraq. Get used to it. There needs to be an amnesty, because if there isn't you're essentially letting the CIA game in the country and in the judicial system which is exactly what the CIA wants and you should whole-heartedly oppose.

Israel spent the summer Cambodia-izing Lebanon, exactly as a by product of our activity in Iraq [hence the term 'Cambodia-izing]. They used munitions we had stored in Israel - apparently $4.2 billion dollars worth including cluster bombs. Do not replenish that store of munitions, evacuate what you can, and get the **** out of there NOW.

FORCE BUSH OUT as the first step in reform.

Revised Historical Perspective

2006-12-13T12:08:00.000-08:00

Let us speak frankly about the Jews.

Vela incident 22 Sep 1979 ['flash' in the Indian Ocean detected by the American Vela spy satellite], and
Mengele 'false flagging' incident the month previous [ORDER TO ARREST MENGELE UPON HIS ARRIVAL IN MIAMI, Secret Cable State Department to United States Embassy Asuncion 28 August 1979 signed VANCE]

were disinformation efforts undertaken by the Jews related to Allard Lowenstein bringing AIDS to Africa AND down-selecting Robert Mugabe to break Rhodesia in a calculated manner as part of a two stage process 1979 ['ying and yang' so to speak].

In context, the Lowenstein AIDS Africa Rhodesia operations took place between the Shah leaving Iran 16 January 1979 and the Hostage Crisis of 04 November 1979. How BAD is it. What is the bottom line in the Jewish treachery?
I think they instigated the Dulce incident with an alien attack and human sacrifice which ends up being pivotal in subsequent activity [AIDS]. That is such a horrible possibility [an orchestrated Dulce] I can barely articulate it, but I increasingly think its true. Heard it here first.

NOW - December 2006 - they have seized control of computer operations in federal buildings and Kinkos retail outlets [elsewhere - now a public library in the District of Columbia] to prevent my uploading photographs to illustrate this sad situation.

Swine. These are not popular points, but I should be allowed to articulate them - and illustrate them - as fully as possible. The Israeli government is a disgrace to the CIA ACLU.

Anyway, in part at the behest of Carter and Andrew Young [as collaborators or reformers isn't clear], Lowenstein made three trips to Africa immediately in the time period; he did at least a partial 'duck and cover' out of the United Nations, traveled on [United States] government business, and apparently was also supported by DeBeers if not Rothschild interests. The whole thing was actually coordinated through Israel, to the point where there is now a question about Lowenstein being an Israeli plant in the CIA [at best] and totally losing track of all ethical grounding in a BLIND allegiance to Zionism [at worst]. They show no remorse and no sign of immediately addressing - ending - this frankly catastrophic situation. Actually, 'catastrophic' per se was probably the late 1980s and early 1990s, but the situation is still not good and it continues. Jews kill the Negroes.

All they can do is cop a 'system' plea [hate the game and not the players]; their involvement is beyond denying.

Our - my - modest contribution is resolving certain loose ends associated with the operations as we try to bring the invidious activity to an end, presumably dismantling what are attack mechanisms hugely undermining democratic government and supervision of the CIA/Mossad and their various independent funding mechanisms.

SIMON WIESENTHAL was a lying swine who cooperated in disinformation schemes designed to shield Nazis - certainly Mengele - after World War II. WHY did he do it? You want to capture 'em - capture 'em. You want to forget about it and move on - forget about it and move on. NO. It turns out that for all their angst and crying, all the treacherous Jews really wanted was the manipulation issue. Ex-Nazis were never a significant or anyway pivotal issue - it was the generations of American school children they were targeting. You'll have to excuse me for my bitterness - I was one. April 15 2002 I demonstrated for Israel at the Capital in Washington D.C. Now let me say, "Never again."

AFX News Limited
World mourns Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter
09.20.2005, 12:46 PM

PARIS (AFX) - Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal, who died in Vienna today aged 96, was lauded across the world as a 'tenacious' fighter who kept alive the cause of justice for victims of the Holocaust.

......'He was the conscience of the world,' Aver Shalev, the director of Israel's Holocaust memorial, said in Jerusalem.
'The Jewish people and all of humanity owe a lot to him because he acted systematically and very strongly ... He will be remembered as a symbol for the Jewish and human conscience, the need to protect moral values.'

Wiesenthal helped bring more than 1,100 Nazi criminals to justice including Adolf Eichmann, the mastermind of Hitler's 'Final Solution,' who was tracked down by Israeli agents in Argentina in 1960.

Six million Jews were murdered by Adolf Hitler's Nazis in World War II.

Israeli President Moshe Katsav, on a visit to Latvia, said Wiesenthal was a fighter who had left the world a better place. 'Simon Wiesenthal was the biggest fighter of our generation. He represented the morality of humanity; he represented the free world, the democratic world,' Katsav said.....

--LIAR, Wiesenthal was a manipulative LIAR --

SURVEILLANCE ELEMENTS ARE [STILL] NOT LETTING PICTURES POST.
So this gets to be a lot of text with no graphic. Anyway, you knew Bush is swine - now you find out there is significant continuity in Nazi activity effectively covered up - in some cases instigated - by the Jews.

Where to begin.
George H.W. Bush put my brother [and two other soldiers and a woman friend] in the river 1984. Following citation is from Wikipedia, CIA on the internet with the interesting observation that the CIA appears to be outsource-ing their entry and possibly writing constructions to foreign countries while American spies - or at least the low level clerical support - need work.
OH THE SWINE.

WHY did Bush put my brother in the river? Turns out the Nazis had similarly maintained their own resistance effort as a way of tracking - and compromising - potentially 'treasonous' activity.

Wikipedia. Conspiratorial groups planning a coup of some kind had existed in the German Army and the military intelligence organisation (the Abwehr) since 1938. Early leaders of these plots included Brigadier-General Hans Oster, head of the Abwehr Military Intelligence Office, a former Army Chief of Staff, General Ludwig Beck, and Field Marshal Erwin von Witzleben.....
SORRY. CANARIS WAS ALWAYS LOYAL. The implication here is that Oster got away from him, and I don't think that's true.

....During 1942 Oster and Tresckow [follow these guys] nevertheless succeeded in rebuilding an effective resistance network. Their most important recruit was General Friedrich Olbricht, head of the General Army Office headquartered at the Bendlerblock in central Berlin, who controlled an independent system of communications to reserve units all over Germany. Linking this asset to Tresckow’s resistance group in Army Group Centre created what appeared to a viable structure for a new effort at organising a coup.
I THINK THAT WAS CANARIS ORIGINATED.

In late 1942 Tresckow and Olbricht formulated a plan to assassinate Hitler and stage a coup during Hitler's visit to the headquarters of Army Group Centre at Smolensk in March 1943, by placing a bomb on his plane. The bomb did not go off, and a second attempt a few days later, when Hitler visited an exhibition of captured Soviet weaponry in Berlin, also failed. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT. These failures demoralised the conspirators. During 1943 they tried without success to recruit senior Army field commanders such as Field Marshal Collin Erich von Manstein and Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt, to support a seizure of power.

By mid 1943 the tide of war was turning decisively against Germany. The Army plotters and their civilian allies became convinced that Hitler must be assassinated so that a government acceptable to the western Allies could be formed and a separate peace negotiated in time to prevent a Soviet invasion of Germany. In August 1943 Tresckow met a young staff officer, Colonel Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, for the first time. Badly wounded in North Africa, Stauffenberg was a political conservative and a zealous German nationalist with a taste for philosophy. He had at first welcomed the Nazi regime but had become rapidly disillusioned. By 1942 he shared the widespead conviction among Army officers that Germany was being led to disaster and that Hitler must be removed from power. For some time his religious scruples had prevented him from coming to the conclusion that assassination was the correct way to achieve this. After Stalingrad, however, he decided that not assassinating Hitler would be a greater moral evil. He brought a new tone of fanaticism to the ranks of the resistance. A SHEEP LED TO SLAUGHTER. DUPE. RUBE. PEOPLE LIKE THIS GUY ARE DANGEROUS.

Olbricht now put forward to Tresckow and Stauffenberg a new strategy for staging a coup against Hitler. The Reserve Army had an operational plan called Operation Walküre (Valkyrie), which was to be used in the event that the disruption caused by the Allied bombing of German cities caused a breakdown in law and order, or a rising by the millions of slave labourers from occupied countries now being used in German factories. Olbricht suggested that this plan could be used to mobilise the Reserve Army to take control of German cities, disarm the SS and arrest the Nazi leadership, once Hitler had been successfully assassinated. Operation Valkyrie could only be put into effect by General Friedrich Fromm, commander of the Reserve Army, so he must either be won over to the conspiracy or in some way neutralised if the plan was to succeed. Fromm, like many senior officers, knew in general about the military conspiracies against Hitler but neither supported them nor reported them to the Gestapo.

During late 1943 and early 1944 there were a series of attempts to get one of the military conspirators near enough to Hitler for long enough to kill him with a bomb or a revolver. But the task was becoming increasingly difficult. THEY WERE PLAYING GAMES. As the war situation deteriorated, Hitler no longer appeared in public and rarely visited Berlin. He spent most of his time at his headquarters at the Wolfschanze (Wolf's Lair) near Rastenburg in East Prussia, with occasional breaks at his Bavarian mountain retreat in Berchtesgaden. In both places he was heavily guarded and rarely saw people he did not already know and trust. Himmler and the Gestapo were increasingly suspicious of plots against Hitler, and specifically suspected the officers of the General Staff, which was indeed the place where most of the young officers willing to sacrifice themselves to kill Hitler were located. All these attempts therefore failed, sometimes by a matter of minutes.

By the summer of 1944 the Gestapo was closing in on the conspirators. NO. THE GESTAPO AND INNER CIRCLE HAD FINALIZED THE EVACUATION SEQUENCING. There was a sense that time was running out, both on the battlefield, where the eastern front was in full retreat and where the Allies had landed in France on 6 June, and in Germany, where the resistance’s room for manoeuvre was rapidly contracting. The belief that this was the last chance for action seized the conspirators. By this time the core of the conspirators had begun to think of themselves as doomed men, whose actions were more symbolic than real. A GUESS IS THAT FEELING WAS CULTIVATED. The purpose of the conspiracy came to be seen by some of them as saving the honour of themselves, their families, the Army and Germany through a grand, if futile, gesture, rather than actually altering the course of history.

One of [MASTER] Tresckow’s aides, [DRONE] Lieutenant Heinrich Graf von Lehndorff-Steinort, wrote to [SLAVE] Stauffenberg: “The assassination must be attempted, coûte que coûte [whatever the cost]. Even if it fails, we must take action in Berlin. For the practical purpose no longer matters; what matters now is that the German resistance movement must take the plunge before the eyes of the world and of history. Compared to that, nothing else matters.”

In retrospect, it is surprising that these months of plotting by the resistance groups in the Army and the state apparatus, in which dozens of people were involved and of which many more, including very senior Army officers, were aware, apparently totally escaped the attention of the Gestapo. In fact the Gestapo had known since February 1943 of both the Abwehr resistance group under the patronage of Admiral Wilhelm Canaris and of the civilian resistance circle around former Leipzig mayor Carl Goerdeler. If all these people had been arrested and interrogated, the Gestapo might well have uncovered the group based in Army Group Centre as well and the July 20 assassination attempt would never have happened. This raises the possibility that Himmler knew about the plot and, for reasons of his own, allowed it to go ahead.
NOT REALLY. IT DEFINITELY RAISES THE PROBABILITY CANARIS AND HIMMLER WERE GAMING IN A 'DRAW DOWN' OR REDUCTION SEQUENCE, HOWEVER. HELLO. HELLO. CAN ANY OLD[ER] NAZIS HEAR ME?

Himmler had at least one conversation with a known oppositionist when, in August 1943, the Prussian Finance Minister Johannes Popitz, who was involved in Goerdeler's network, came to see him and offered him the support of the opposition if he would make a move to displace Hitler and secure a negotiated end to the war. Nothing came of this meeting, but Popitz was not arrested and Himmler apparently did nothing to track down the resistance network which he knew was operating within the state bureaucracy. WRONG. HE DID NOT STOP IT BUT HE TRACKED IT. AND HE ALSO RAN A WAR - THOSE GUYS REALLY WERE EFFICIENT. It is possible that Himmler, who by late 1943 knew that the war was unwinnable, allowed the July 20 plot to go ahead in the knowledge that if it succeeded he would be Hitler's successor, and could then bring about a peace settlement. Popitz was not alone in seeing in Himmler a potential ally. General von Bock advised Tresckow to seek his support, but there is no evidence that he did so. Goerdeler was apparently also in indirect contact with Himmler via a mutual acquaintance Carl Langbehn. Canaris's biographer Heinz Höhne suggests that Canaris and Himmler were working together [YES] to bring about a change of regime [NO]...... [end citation]

THEY MASTERFULLY MANIPULATED THE RESISTANCE TO THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT. INCREDIBLE. And still have academics kissing their ass and calling it roses. Most people - certainly the blind in academia - think it was resistance but the opposite is true: in fact it was enhancement. NEVER, ever, call the Nazis stupid, because they were not stupid.

Bush, on the other hand, is SWINE. And word on the street is that Dulles - wherever he is and whatever he looks like - does not have as many friends as he thinks he has. It is even possible he had Bush put my brother in the river as some kind of bizarre 'master stroke' I am now trying to make him regret. Double swine. The worst thing about it is that the Nazis really didn't take down guys who were loyal to them, and that is something Bush [and Dulles] specialize in. That is what characterizes them. That is their whole game plan. As follows:

....killed on or about June 3, 1985.... In 1983, Buckley succeeded Ken Haas as the Beirut Station Chief/Political Officer at the U.S. Embassy, but was kidnapped by the Islamist group Hezbollah on March 16, 1984. Hezbollah was closely allied to Iran and Buckley was smuggled to Tehran via Damascus aboard an Iranian plane at some point during his captivity. After undergoing torture, it was soon discovered that he was a senior CIA officer. Buckley was ultimately tortured for 444 days. [Wikipedia, CIA on the internet].

STOP WORKING FOR THE ISRAELIS. Do not serve the Zionist movement.

Finally a supposedly independent commission that actually was independent, and their report gets no respect. Bush has a CIA plan for ethnic segregation in Iraq and doesn't want to compromise now. Shortsighted - if we're there we can't protest that it happened, but if we leave we can always wail in angst over it and maybe get United Nations support to intervene [or re-intervene as it were]. Deniability claiming we weren't in on it and certainly didn't originate the idea.

Their military and police reside in a culture which the Americans can resist but I don't think they can ultimately shape other than by simply killing people and physically dividing the place. French Algeria.

We should leave; PLEASE do not let Bush 'Palestinian-ize' Iraq.

William Buckley [middle] was betrayed by George H.W. Bush and Ted Shackley as a way of bringing Bill Casey and the Reagan administration wholeheartedly into Iran Contra. As noted, conceptually kidnapped March 16, 1984 and killed on or about June 3 1985.

I had a brother, John Roser Bestor, 3rd Inf Reg Old Guard. PRIOR to joining the service he interviewed with a job for the CIA but they apparently did not hire him; AFTER joining the Army he alleged there were loyalty issues in the unit [officers and senior NCOs were educating the troops away from respect for civilian oversight of the military] and promptly drowned in the Potomac mid-May 1984.
Fairly certain George H.W.Bush betrayed Buckley, the proximate timing is certainly of interest to me.

To the best of my knowledge Buckley did die and my brother did drown. At issue is whether Bush betrayed them both. My brother went into the river at the base of a dam, and I can't imagine how anybody could save a struggling man who thought he was drowning - never mind a girl and two other soldiers who were with him [Brian and Raymond]. Two frogmen [Navy Seals] per person with air tanks or breathing devices maybe shared[?] - before smuggling them out of the river for facial recontructive surgery and new lives. Army puts them in the water and all the officers unified in denying it in their contempt for civilian oversight over the military; they probably wouldn't call the cops but just be lucky to get away. If somebody had saved them they would probably split the soldiers up - they might have made my brother marry the girl as a way of locking him down but really the whole thing sounds too extreme.

That is a stretch. Who could command Navy Seals or frogmen anyway. Well, my brother was taking courses at American University and its possible he spoke with a professor about the [dis]loyalty issue. And the professor was maybe tied to the CIA[?] and they heard about the plot and rescued him. They heard about the plot, and then they undertook surveillance to uncover the details of the plot. And rescued them. No, George H.W.Bush commanded the CIA. It wouldn't have been the Agency 'covertly' covertly riding to the rescue. Double undercover covertly.

Perhaps an officer in the 3rd Inf Reg heard talk of the plan and somehow got to a command authority apart from the unit [Army officer thru a mechanism to Navy Seals or anyway damn good frogmen because you wouldn't want the soldiers who thought they were drowning to pull down the guys trying to save them which I bet is a real danger in a stunt like that]. That might initially save the guys, but after that what happens; those secrets generally don't keep [three soldiers, eight frogmen, media interface and ultimately the funerals represent a curve in the road]. Grow a beard and move to Oregon - get out of Dodge. He might let you go - he might not, but I am pretty confident George H.W.Bush would ultimately hear snitches coming back about that because he commands a whole structure of people who are just dying to tell him secrets. In the same time period they kidnapped children and sold them into homosexual slavery [Johnny Gosch 1982], and to the best of my knowledge they never let those guys just escape even after they grew up but if they got away they had to stay in hiding. Mrs. Gosch suggested on Indian reservations. Supposedly Ross Perot had located escaped American POWs in Southeast Asia on the margins of Thailand 1992 but couldn't return them to the United States. That was going to be the 'October Surprise,' and Bush got wind of it and killed it.

If some structure or organization broke you free, my guess is that if they throw you long it might be the Army - somebody's brother has a place in the mountains west of Fort Carson. Grow a beard and work a lift in a ski resort winters. I would think that keeping you close - under their thumb - is almost certainly Agency.

Either way I see George H.W. Bush in on it, and my guess is that if the guys DID NOT drowned or if Buckley did not really die then Bush was behind the whole thing. CIA relentlessly plays both sides of any coin, and Bush may have been intending to create his own 'opposition' as both a way of unifying his supporters and as a way of marginalizing forces in the bureaucracy which were and are against the larger manipulation scenarios. Hush hush secret; what an ***hole. Both Buckley and my brother were ways of attacking civil infrastructure and extending CIA effectivity - I cannot believe my brother once wanted to join the Agency on his own. Misguided.

So if you were to finalize the scenario however unlikely, you might say Bush put them in the river, he pulled them out, and now he probably wants to send them to Iraq to die. Put 'em in, pulled 'em out, ****ed with 'em for years [and they could never quite figure it out - just a bad break; people didn't work for you like they might have worked for somebody else, intangible, 'personality' which put 'em in the water in the first place], and now he wants to kill 'em. BUSH IS SWINE. Were the other soldiers - Brian and Ray - PISSED OFF or what [did they stay in or move on]. Pressure my brother into marrying the girl. Hopefully she's done well by him or really tried with honest effort; he would try for her. Or maybe they laughed and divorced and walked. If you live through the river don't go to Iraq.

Resist without throwing your guys under the tank treads; beware of treachery in a very fluid environment, but most of all stay with the sense of history and what you represent.

FREEDOM BETRAYED

2006-11-10T12:41:00.000-08:00

PLEASE do not let them 'PALESTINIAN-IZE' the Iraqi people. Ruled first by the Ottoman Empire, then by an imposed King, after that a dictator, now they got us. Any regrets? Yeah, they should have fought harder for the Ottomans. What a great government - taxes were low and they didn't show up very often.
Do not let Bush turn Baghdad into French Algeria with barricades or by radiating crowds; do not let them 'West Bank-isize' Iraq.

REVISION. Previously accused the CIA of downselecting Mugabe to destroy Rhodesia Zimbabwe [kicking whites off the farms was not black nationalism but rather CIA diminishing regional food security]. What really was the difference between Mugabe and Nkomo? Mugabe promised to do what they told him to do [certain]; my SUSPICION was and is that the CIA basically maintains him - Mugabe - somehow, perhaps with funding coming out of the World Bank. IN FACT I DON'T KNOW for sure if they give him money or if he pays them for the franchise. It's conceptually possible they use him as a funding mechanism, particularly to the extent he can tax energy imports for example. Where they're able to do that, a guess is they keep funding in the region and if they can't make it balance [bribes to revenue] they'll try to cover by putting people on a NGO revenue stream. Maybe administered by USAID people in Africa. No idea how they do it in Russia for example.

Buddha destroyed by Taliban at behest of CIA

DEMOCRATS TRADED GATES FOR BOLTON. Hillary Clinton positioned a certain number of junior officers, and if she lets GATES pass she must be counting on them to ride it out and cushion the distain of the officer corps. They could have fought it and won.

Levin could have poked him hard but wouldn't throw him down on his own. This may be the end of the Senate's 'confirmation' authority. CIA Secretary Gates with Israeli Agent Wolfawhore passing out CIA bribe money at the World Bank.
Nobody in the Senate has any right to run for the presidency of the United States. Not one of them after Gates went through. What a bunch of Quisling collaborators; a mighty nation betrayed.

Gates is significantly opposed in the military. GATES IN THE PENTAGON WILL BE MUCH WORSE THAN BOLTON IN THE UNITED NATIONS WHICH IS MOSTLY CIA CORRUPTED ANYHOW.

Point
How NATO Chose to Fail in Afghanistan
Analysis: The Riga summit was meant to turn around an Alliance mission in trouble. But its a mission for which there's little political will
By JAMES GRAFF/PARIS

Counterpoint
NATO per se is fine. THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY IS ON TO BUSH AND HIS SWINE GAMING. Germany, France say 'no' to the Pat Tillman deliberate sacrifice of their own soldiers in CIA orchestration concepts.
'How about you guys stop working on the side of the terrorists'; comments to Bush at World Forum.

Background: Afghanistan Clouds the Summit

Posted Monday, Dec. 04, 2006
The yardstick by which the success of NATO's summit in the Latvian capital of Riga would be measured was always going to be Afghanistan. By engaging 32,000 troops there - its first full-scale military action outside of Europe - against a now resurgent Taliban [AFTER the CIA had them blow down two historic stone buddha figures AND negotiated them basing rights in Pakistan], the Western alliance had posed itself a cruel test of solidarity in one of the world's most historically ungovernable patches. Last week it effectively failed the test.

OVERCOMING SIX YEARS OF SNIDE REMARKS WHILE SLIDING INTO COLLABORATION, THE EUROPEANS FINALLY SAID "**** YOU."

President George W. Bush and his key allies — Britain's Prime Minister Tony Blair, Canadian leader Stephen Harper and NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer — wanted a greater sharing of the burden, and to give ground commanders full authority to deploy troops as they see fit, rather than be required to refer back to defense ministries in Europe's capitals. But the caveats that keep Italian, French, German and Spanish troops out of the heavy combat zones in the south of the country were not significantly relaxed [REMEMBER PAT TILLMAN]. The Poles offered up an additional 1,000 troops toward the 2,500 reserve force that NATO military staff consider crucial to prosecute the war, and the French were among the allies promising to deploy troops to trouble spots in the event of "an emergency."

FRENCH PARAMILITARY CLIMBS OUT OF THE 'CROWS NEST' ON THE ROOF OF THE WHITE HOUSE, THROWS THE GATES WIDE OPEN, GETS COFFEE AND WAITS FOR SENATE MESSENGER TO ARRIVE WITH POLICE AND IMPEACHMENT VERDICT.

But the sum effect was cold comfort for the Canadian, British, American and Dutch governments whose troops are bearing the brunt of the conflict. Canadian Foreign Minister Peter McKay, whose country has lost 40 soldiers this year, expressed concerns that an already jittery Canadian public could begin to balk at its commitment if its allies aren't seen as pulling their weight.

Just IMAGINE how pissed off the Canadian public would be if they knew the CIA was in on killing the four Mounties while their soldiers were fighting in Afghanistan.
2005-03-06
Pravda. Shooting deaths of four Mounties: the investigation is started
Canada's police force started investigating on Friday the shooting deaths of four Mounties in one of the worst bloodbaths in the force's history, a tragedy that has shocked a country where such violent crime is rare.
The officers, all junior members of the storied Royal Canadian Mounted Police, were gunned down Thursday during a raid at an illicit marijuana growing operation near Mayerthorpe, Alberta, 90 miles northwest of Edmonton....

With that blatant act - before that certainly but with that as a prime example of cross-border orchestration - it is time to re-examine the relationship between the security agencies and the divided if not spineless law enforcement community.
THERE IS A PRICE ASSOCIATED WITH KEEPING PRISONERS IN CUBA. IF YOU BELIEVE THEY REALLY ARE CRIMINALS - EVEN VERY SERIOUS CRIMINALS - YOU SHOULD HOLD THEM IN LEAVENWORTH OR FLORENCE. Well, we're letting the security agencies get into law and administrative law process. Supposedly the American Army - or the Army on behalf of the CIA - wants to divert $125 MILLION dollars for a 'trial' [or tribunal] facility in Cuba, and that is a wrong thing.

NATO in Afghanistan has become an institutional fig leaf for an ad-hoc and unstable coalition of the willing. The crux of the Atlantic alliance is its mutual defense clause, the all-for-one principle, in which an attack on any member is considered an attack on them all. But that clause's limitations were first displayed after Sept. 11, 2001, when it was invoked in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, only to be spurned by a Bush administration set on keeping tight reins on its response.

THANK GOD. EUROPEAN DOUBTS ARE FINALLY STARTING TO PROTECT AMERICAN RIGHTS.

U.S. skepticism over the efficacy of the alliance, however, didn't start with President Bush. Clinton administration officials had bitterly complained of the political meddling and command confusion that hampered NATO's 1999 air war to push Serb troops out of Kosovo.
ANOTHER COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ORCHESTRATED CONFLICT.

Now the rebuff is coming from the other side, for equally understandable reasons. Mutual defense of NATO territory is one thing; the call to stand shoulder-to-shoulder in a bedeviled country thousands of miles away from Europe is a more troublesome proposition. It isn't simply a question of resources: Canada is on the front line despite an anemic defense budget. For all the lip-service paid to Afghanistan as a war that cannot be lost, there seems to be a lack of political will to do what is necessary to win it.
CIA ROBERT GATES IS NOT THE ANSWER.

The French are right that military action in the south of Afghanistan isn't making many friends for the West, and they at least have been consistent in counseling against NATO taking on a war-fighting role. But the Taliban isn't going to yield peacefully to the economic aid and civic encouragement aimed at bolstering the embattled government of Hamid Karzai. Security comes first. At Riga the alliance underwrote a still vague plan for a "Contact Group' that would involve neighboring countries and international organizations in the search for a solution for Afghanistan. But Washington's velvet-gloved relationship with Pakistan — and its non-existent relationship with Iran — augurs poorly for that effort. Robust and dangerous military action is a still unavoidable task, and NATO after Riga is in no better shape to manage it fairly than before.

KEEP GATES OUT. OPPOSE THE CIA. DON'T COLLABORATE. IF THE DEMOCRATS CAVE HERE I HOPE THEY LOSE THE MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE. Just when I was starting to like them they quit on me.

OBama and Hillary are both contenders, but they're also both CIA and obviously there is an Agency push on. Who else. Feinstein. Rockefeller. McCain is locked into that paradigm. Actually, it make an interesting survey: - 'percentage of the time voting with the Central Intelligence Agency.'
On the other hand, Durbin may resist.

The CIA School Bus Crash Paradigm: trying to restrict your child’s freedom on the ride to and from, not incidentally advancing the government’s regulatory structures.

Graphic shows the Alabama crash and an immediate subsequent crash in California.

It isn’t funny – three girls died down in Alabama [update – fourth girl died in the hospital, and its VERY possible CIA doctors killed her in the hospital disappointed they didn't have more to choose from]. There is a big military installation either in or near Huntsville, and its interesting to speculate this may, in some bizarre way, relate to the nomination of Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense. If the bus crashed on Fort Bragg it evidently would – a ‘military town’ might be less proximate.

Alan Ross is a dentist in CIA M. Jodi Rell Torrington Connecticut currently prominent in the ‘conceptual safety advocacy’ beyond that it is killing school girls [Alan Ross, president of the nonprofit National Coalition for School Bus Safety….]. No word on whether or not he’s related to the recently ‘conceptually executed’ Michael Bruce Ross, also of Connecticut.

CIA Robert Gates, Interim Dean of the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M for the GREAT MAYBE CIA BONFIRE DISASTER of November [18] 1999 and doesn't see anything ironic in that. If its school buses why wouldn't be a bonfire [gunman shots down Virginia Tech on the first day of classes 2006 following the exploding pizza man of Erie on the first day of class at Allegheny though that's a couple years ago now].

THE CIA ENERGY UNIFICATION FUNDING MECHANISM
Graphic is of CIA Robert Gates, CIA Marc Rich of the famous Clinton ‘Pardon for services to the CIA’ and Robert Gates energy alliance, his partner Pincus Green [not a great picture of Green], and Leo Wanta who with them in the rape of Russia but in currency trading rather than energy.

Closer to the West, but Closed to Scrutiny; Ukraine’s Natural Gas Business Is a Mystery, Steven Mufson, Washington Post, December 02 2006 page D01. [M]any energy experts say that a shroud of mystery regarding Ukraine’s natural gas business should have kept the country from meeting the Millennium Challenge Corp. standards for U.S. assistance. These experts point especially to the hidden identities of the owners of a Swiss-based company called RosUrkEnergo, which has been handed the rights to negotiate for all of Ukraine’s natural gas exports from Russia and Turkmenistan, raising questions about possible conflicts of interest or corruption.

U.S. companies that have explored doing business with RosUrkEnergo have been frustrated by its lack of transparency. One firm uncovered links to more than 140 offshore companies and trusts, from remote island nations such as Naura and the Seychelles to Cyprus and Panama, according to an internal document. Another U.S. company’s representative said a lawyer for the RosUkrEnergo owners didn’t see why the American company needed to know who it was doing business with.....

That flow of gas to Europe seemed secure until last New Years Day [apparently Jan 01 2006], when Russia cut off shipments after Ukraine refused to agree to sharp increases in prices. Three days later the dispute ended when Russian natural gas monopoly Gazprom and the Ukrainian national oil company Naftohaz signed a supply agreement that gave RosUkrEnergo the role of Ukraine’s middleman.
Why the need for RosUkrEnergo? The most likely answer is the company’s connections rather than its expertise. Half of RosUkrEnergo is owned by Gazprom; the other half is managed by a subsidiary of an Austrian firm called Raiffeisen Zentralbank on behalf of a group of Ukrainian businessmen. RosUkrEnergo is registered in Zug, Switzerland, where taxes are low and financial secrecy laws are strong.

One international consultant believes that RosUkrEnergo has earned hundreds of millions of dollars for transactions that could have easily been handled by the state oil and gas company. Ukraine’s energy minister said the country had paid RosUkrEnergo $300 million this year and owed another $300 million, Agence France-Presse reported last month.
“RosUkrEnergo, the controversial Swiss-based gas trading company, is playing a growing and persistently opaque role in the Ukranian gas sector,” according to a report issued in October by the International Energy Agency. “It’s ownership structure is murky, and the company appears to make significant profit simply because it signs contracts to transit gas from Central Asia to Ukraine.”.........

A Ukrainian businessman, Dmytro Firtash, has claimed that he owns 45 percent of RosUkrEnergo, but diplomats and investigators for companies and non-governmental groups like London-based Global Witness believe he is a front man for well-connected Russians and Ukrainians.
Recently, RosUkrEnergo has moved deeper into Ukraine’s domestic gas supply business. A new joint venture with Gazprom has been given most of the domestic distribution business. How it will run the network remains the subject of some anxiety; in November the venture refused to sign new gas deals with 16 Ukrainian companies in what some observers see as an effort to extract ownership stakes in the companies....
Meanwhile, Western oil and gas companies are hoping for greater clarity as they seek approval to explore in the Black Sea.

Last Christmas Eve, the government published, in Ukrainian only, a notice inviting tender bids on a 12,000-square-kilometer deepwater exploration bloc in the Ukrainian portion of the Black Sea. [ ] [D]espite the low-profile announcement, it drew five bids from companies, including ExxonMobil.
The surprise winners were Vanco Energy Co., a small Houston-based firm that has prospected for oil and gas in deep water off the coast of West Africa, and JNR, an investment arm of the Rothschild family.......

Increasingly clear is that so-called 'Big Oil' or 'The Energy Sector' is a CIA unified funding mechanism, now pretty evidently including in Russia and the Ukraine.

Reported yesterday, November 29 2006, the plan is to send four battalions of COMBAT ENGINEERS over to turn Baghdad into French-Algeria. The Israelis have earned so much good will in the Gaza and West Bank the King of Jordan suggested we try the same thing in Iraq, dividing up the big - and even the not so big - Iraqi cities. After all, on the way out the door Westmoreland was saying we could have held Saigon [but for the CIA PHOENIX and program of ultimate betrayal anyway] if we had just been willing to spread around a little chicken wire and some two by fours.

This is absurd. Is there any pandering the religious right won't do for Jerusalem? Karl Rove just got off the phone - how many battalions of COMBAT ENGINEERS have you got; temporary bridges, wire, few guard towers with spotlights, a Superdome to house displaced persons in Baghdad so Barbara Bush can say its actually better than where they were living anyway, main gate posts to hitch the fence to, and some temporary housing units for a ghetto.

Robert Gates CIA. BAG HIM. Force him out; DO NOT confirm him. The REAL FEAR is that once they have the Iraqis locked down in a mobility restricted paradigm, they will radiate the neighborhoods to turn them into pumpkins. Have we reached the point of saying fifty percent of them actually were better off under Saddam Hussein? What is the tipping point which justifies an invasion - fifty/fifty? The second part of the problem is that the failures and idiocy [some intentional and some just collateral damage] make Hussein look better than he really was.
We should leave Iraq. Combat Engineers to divide Baghdad, our last best idea, is just asinine and self serving. GET THE GUYS OUT, and undertake economic interventions designed to stabilize given cities or areas from outside. Probably using proxy foreign governments because we have disgraced ourselves and are basically hated.

Bush is a communist, or in any case the Republicans have, at an overview level, enacted a Marxist-Leninist trade policy.

"Developing capitalism knows two historical tendencies in the national question. The first is the awakening of national life and national movements, the struggle against all natural oppression and the creation of nation states. The second is the development and growing frequency of international intercourse in every form, the breakdown of national barriers, the creation of the international unity of capital, of economic life in general, of politics, of science, etc.
Both tendencies are a universal law of capitalism. The former predominates in the beginning of its development, the latter characterizes a mature capitalism that is moving toward its transformation into socialist society." Lenin, "Critical Remarks on the National Question" page 108 [in Lenin on the Jewish Question, Hyman Lumer ed., International Publishers, New York 1974].

William Buckley [middle] was tortured to death after being betrayed by George H.W. Bush and Ted Shackley as a way of bringing Bill Casey and the Reagan administration wholeheartedly into Iran Contra. Guessing they were ultimately behind it, at an overview level this may be an action photo as Israelis ‘cape the bull’ and it doesn’t automatically increase your respect for Bill Casey. You are wondering why ROBERT GATES was ultimately involved and we are wondering that too. That he was is certain – the history of IRAN CONTRA definitely includes Gates, but he was supposedly a specialist in the Soviet Union and it almost looks like he was tacked on the end for CIA ‘administrative reasons’ – anticipating higher office, his involvement may have been intended to diminish Congressional legitimacy or blatantly ‘put one over’ on reform efforts in Congress and media.

Resist without throwing your guys under the tanks. The French in occupied France getting downed pilots out and destabilizing the occupation. BAD NEWS. Richard Helms went on to specialize in setting up pseudo-resistance forces in Eastern Europe which were then betrayed to the Soviets in anticipation of eliminating potential resistance to the Communist Bloc unification. Kind of like honest police recruits in Iraq today.

Ames.

Hanssen.

Secretary of Defense?!?

Surely you jest.

They just suck. And we understand the reciprocity concept. We understand the decline of the British Empire was significantly managed or orchestrated, and Treason In The Blood by Anthony Cave Brown [Houghton Mifflin Co. New York 1994 on Kim Philby and his father who similarly betrayed the British only for the Americans in the Middle East] suggests that was not entirely a bad thing - though 'communism' broadly stated has not typically bettered the human condition and the Chinese in particular do not have a government which lends itself to the competition of ideas, reward of individual accomplishment, or transparency in what is conceptually a classless economic environment. Instead they're all about 'pull', ties, and relationships.

CIA Gates as Secretary of Defense - can't some Senator put a hold on that and force Bush to name somebody else as "Acting" Secretary of Defense as the Iraqi situation is clarified? Do you want to confirm a Secretary of Defense or even hold hearings on the slot during what everybody - us, the Iraqis, and the Europeans [for that matter the Soviets and Asians] - understands to be a transition period in strategy?

The IRAQ situation REVISED as Bush moves or tries to move career CIA into the Pentagon. In memory of my brother, John Roser Bestor, 3rd Infantry Regiment, May 1984.

Advice that I would give an honest man today.

He went to Vietnam - Bush did - and that is essentially the outcome they're looking for in Iraq, with a PHOENIX program to eliminate resistance and enable a fairly draconian government to take over [PHOENIX was our CIA program to eliminate resistance in SOUTH VIETNAM in anticipation of the Communist victory, with that eventual government being the 'Phoenix' which rules today - it was entirely successful; who says we lost that war?].

DO NOT go to Iraq now, as we enter a training phase which focuses on 'unifying' their troops [turning their military into a tool of the police state], because it will DEFINITELY involve CIA identification of collaborating elements and elimination of allegedly 'uncooperative' elements - innocent, friendly and otherwise.

Don't be proud of it or ashamed of it - be AWARE of it. Unfortunate, the CIA favors hostile collaboration and victimizes friendly or naive 'independent' elements. That is their entire game plan - essential duplicity with plentiful resources at key junctures.

1956 Hungary to the revolt in the south and Kurdish areas following the first gulf war, which George H. W. Bush instigated and abandoned as a way of re-establishing Saddam Hussein's regime.

Within that paradigm the CIA will command home field advantage. The percentage of American officers 'in country' will rise and naturally some will die, with the CIA playing both sides of the coin.

They will use assassinations [betrayal of Americans to death as they famously do with roadside bombs] as a way of solidifying the participation of allegedly 'rouge' Iraqi elements [which in turn will offer up a sacrifice in many cases - 'we caught the guy who did it' with folded flag at the funeral of the American which probably will not be in Arlington if they can prevent it but at one of the lesser cemetaries - no waiting, though their picks don't have to wait at Arlington],

on the other hand holding out medals and promotions for choice career Army officers looking for the stamp in the folder or rung on the ladder.

For the sake of the argument, supposing you have friends that could try and mitigate the CIA's ability to kill a particular American [officer, troop or contractor].
NOTE: YES, THE CIA KILLS OUR OWN OFFICERS. Two captains from Michigan with a car bomb at a check point - no idea how they got TWO captains both of whom should have known better to pull the duty, but Jennifer Granholm, governor of Michigan, is affiliated with the CIA and that is from a very reliable source.

EVEN WITH top friends - don't go.

Senator Warner [R-Va]. Supposing Senator Warner happens to be your friend?
Carl Levin couldn't do anything for the two captains.

Plus you know what they're doing to Iraq. Its imperial. Colonization without the responsibility of actually trying to do a good job; Nazis picking Vichy and Quisling. Sure you admire the panzers, but you also want to hang the Vichy - unfortunately its one picture.

AN ENTIRE CAREER spent in obstinate deference to civilian authority over the military.
No, one doesn't rocket to the top - 'slow major' might be the best that happens, particularly if you are loath to bluff with ignorance as the quicker men to rise might do.
You have credibility in it - walk away, retire, but you always resist, and there aren't enough of us resisting for you to throw it away. Suppose they promise light colonel or bird colonel - well, there is no resistance if you die.

Suppose 'the friends that made you' will be pissed if you walked on them, or more immediately you'd like the grade for retirement [wouldn't we all].
If they're big enough friends they can bring you back as a contractor - still don't go to Iraq - and they will keep your number anyway with very little effort on your part [send them a card at Christmas] because now that they made you they don't want to throw you away.

Across the years has the same type of problem ever come up somewhere else - did 'good guys' ever use you to go sit on a base where a corrupt command structure was killing American servicemen? The 2004/2005 alleged suicide "death cluster" at the sub base in New London comes to mind.
That may be what they want you to do in Iraq - go 'babysit' so Special Forces doesn't kill Pat Tillman all over again.
Don't go.
You're too unique a resource - if they were serious about that they'd already have you up at Walter Reed as CID with authorization to make biting comments [attributed] to media, because by now our guys know its the GPS on an ordered patrol route triggering the bombs.

1. Some guys pretty evidently volunteer for death [sgt from Sparks Reno NV in an Army mechanized unit, and I think a Marine maybe from Connecticut but anyway who had a retarded younger brother], and
2. some guys don't. Pat Tillman as what I call a CIA 'marquee' death. Blue Death cluster 2005 [CIA killing cops] had marquee deaths in Providence Rhode Island, Minneapolis-Saint Paul and Denver though the NUMBER of deaths was substantially more than that - I counted something like fifty and that was in an informal survey of media. Hate to say it, but the sergeant who got the Medal of Honor might have been down selected because he had a son for the graveside photograph, or at least the photograph with the President.
2.A. 'Passion play' [the hammering of Ohio 'Lucky Lima' or a Guard/Reserve unit from near New Orleans] is a subset of the marquee death.
3. Some deaths in Iraq appear to be undertaken for regional distribution in the United States [look for parades and big crowd turnouts with school children standing for hours with signs in a front page photo in the regional daily].
4. Some deaths appear to be undertaken for reasons of diversity [if not the deaths of virtually all women in theater to date, at least the early death of a woman in military intel on the first leg of her trip home].
5. Some deaths are sacrifice flies - two guys from Kentucky going over as security contractors when Blackwater wanted to keep the market limited [2005]. For that matter, the famous death of the four Blackwater guys who got burned and hung from the bridge, enabling Bush to send in the Marines and level the city - making it very clear to the Iraqis they are better off killing our soldiers than our mercenaries. I very much believe they were sacrifice flies used in a marquee event but were not marquee deaths in-and-of themselves, though the categories obviously blur.

HOW MANY has the CIA killed? When there were 1,500 American deaths, I guessed the CIA had killed 'a couple hundred' of them. And heard I was way low.

All right. If some are volunteers, how do they volunteer or who asks them? Do Reserve military intel detachments help make the selection for regional distribution?
Some warrantless surveillance is going on in the United States relative to that. What are the communication mechanisms used to convey the external death request - conventional lines of communication in military intelligence at least for the regional distribution? If so they almost certainly use code words or designators - what are they?
As opposed to sacrifice flies who are fingered for death in theater, right? Are their deaths arranged in the regimental command [you still generally need interpreters if there is going to be any Iraqi interface, right?], or does the occasional sacrifice fly rise to the theater level?
Is this something the XO typically works while the company commander tries to stay 'clean' on it? Somebody has to put the vehicle next to the roadside bomb. How do they designate which vehicle? Maybe a sneaky electronic bug planted in the seat cushion, maybe its a homing device on the GPS, but maybe they put a big damn chalk mark on the door.
How do they MAKE the patrol commander stop at the appropriate location or take the exact specified route? What happens if some of the guys disconnect their GPS units?
Do they have Special Forces with the Iraqi 'terrorists'? Do they have CIA actually with them - probably yes. Who communicates with them, adjudicating the violence, and when they need to meet how is it done? Where is it done - in Syria, or more likely in the Kurdish area.

If you do not already know the answers to these few questions - never mind the questions somebody in country would be able to ask - DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT GOING.
Only bird colonels know those answers. Well if you ain't a bird colonel you can't go, and it ain't 'hustle up.' Brief you on the plane. **** that.

Do not just disagree with them - hold them in contempt. SWINE.

**** sending you to Iraq when they haven't done the precursor work. THEY haven't positioned you - it isn't that you're 'walking away from it.' Washington Post reports some of our advisors refuse to go out with the Iraqi troops but stay in contact via cell phone. I can't blame the advisors.

OF COURSE simply quit. If you can. AWOL if you have to and your friends can swing it - don't let them catch you. You may have to sacrifice half a foot 'in a chain saw accident.' I'd say to go fishing in Canada and get lost and walk out - take a year or two; but I think they'd find you. Hiding in Thailand is out [certainly on your own, and they will pressure even very good friends]; finding the needle in the hay stack is simple these days if they know which haystack to look in. Be decisive and beat them or they will make you wear it.

No way will friends make YOU go to Iraq or Afghanistan. CIA - Special Forces or whoever [what happened to the command structure in the 3rd Reg Old Guard - did they advance without incident?] - will also kill you in Afghanistan. If people try to make you go they aren't your friends.

That is the best advice I can give an honest man. MY congressional delegate [non-voting] is Eleanor Holmes Norton, and she is CIA.

Having come this far I HOPE - I really hope - your friends can deliver this one last time, and you can walk away. Learn to relax; teach or tutor at a college/university as you go for the Ph.D., but really just sit to be a resource used when the 'peculiar situations' come to light.
University has a great population [as fluid or stable as you need to it be] with broad categories to tuck somebody in across a stabilization period, an orientation period, and a launch period. If you've pulled military guys there's a fair chance they were at the cross roads once and picked military rather than college or grad school anyway in which case you're just putting them back at that cross roads [Question: How often do you pull military guys? Answer: As often as you can if they're targeted for Special Forces/CIA/"terrorist" death in Iraq].
Older military guys can be brought in as visiting professors or vaguely defined researchers,
and, if you're parking people from overseas, they can tutor/teach languages or so-called 'political science'. Under-utilized counterweight to the Chinese is RAW ['Research and Analysis Wing' with the name left over from the days of the Raj - they're the Indian CIA], and the ounce of awareness mitigates the pound of hostile assailants at least across the stabilization and orientation periods.

Charles De Gaulle's resistance speech in French. The occupation was actually brief, some - famously women who got their heads shaven afterwards - collaborated, and, shamefully, the police always outnumbered Germans in Paris. Is that more bleak or less bleak than its represented in the history books as being?

The one thing they KNOW with certainty is that you're good for it. It really isn't walking, it's waiting.

Because he knows with certainty they do it, and because he knows with certainty you're targeted, my guess is that Senator Warner might be able to deliver for you.

The merry pranksters. Gates with his right and left hand men [Wanta and Rich]. Missing is Rich's partner Pincus Green. Anyhow these guys did it, and ought to be shunned by people of good character. You shutter for your child to see Janet Jackson's breast on television but don't hesitate for them to meet Robert Gates, CIA Boy Scout Rapist of the Soviet Union who has old pensioners living in the street. WHAT SWINE. Those Amish are by no means stupid or backwards ['shun'] - we don't have enough tools at our disposal, in part because in our society wealth excuses bad manners.

SWINE ROBERT GATES. Bag the man, bounce the man, and bounce the man HARD.

Gates Nomination (Senate - November 07, 1991)[Page: S16305][Begin Insert] Mr. HARKIN. Mr. President, I rise in opposition to the nomination of Robert Gates to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency..... Mr. President, Robert Gates is a career Soviet analyst and former Deputy Director of the CIA who was wrong about what CIA analyst Harold Ford described as 'the central analytic target of the past few years: the probable fortunes of the USSR and the Soviet European bloc.' And I believe that the committee report points out one possible reason why the CIA failed to predict the collapse of the Soviet Union. According to testimony, Mr. Gates was busy pursuing hypotheses and making unsubstantiated arguments attempting to show Soviet expansion in the Third World, instead of looking for or paying attention to facts that pointed in the opposite direction. Why? Why, as Senator Monihan has pointed out, was the CIA able to tell Presidents everything about the Soviet Union except the fact that it was falling apart?.....

SMOKE SCREEN. An endless lie to Congress, which is KNOWN to be riddled with members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Unfortunately the situation is much worse than Gates merely being wrong. The CIA actually restructured the Soviet Union to its own ends. Pictured is RAPIST Leo Wanta who led the gang bang as Robert Gates held the girl down with a pillow over her mouth; in this rare photo he appears to be wearing a Masonic jewel.
UNBELIEVABLE Bush would try to move Gates into the Pentagon as Secretary of Defense. AUDACITY.

If you didn't like Bill Clinton you can't respect Robert Gates. He is simply the last minute Marc Rich pardon cover up on the Republican side with broad bipartisan tendencies. Marc Rich was undertaking activity from Switzerland for the CIA in at least UTILIZING the demise of the Soviet Union as a CIA funding mechanism [profiteering in various natural resources including oil]. Whether or not he was able to CAPTURE a revenue stream or streams apart from legislative oversight [for the Council on Foreign Relations or CIA - Marc Rich, maybe for Israel] on a permanent basis is not clear.

SWINE GATES.

GEORGE W. BUSH, pictured in a 'red state.'

Bush, sanctimonious in awareness of the CIA program 1968-1973 to kill the South Vietnamese resistance structures in anticipation of the North Vietnamese victory [Phoenix].

Bush urges patience on winning Iraq war, By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent Fri Nov 17, 4:20 PM ET.
HANOI, Vietnam - In a land where America suffered military defeat, President Bush urged patience for the war in Iraq Friday and tried to stiffen global resolve to challenge a nuclear-armed North Korea.
.... As for local Vietnamese, the turnout for Bush as his motorcade moved past storefronts was far more subdued that the enthusiastic reception that greeted President Clinton six years ago. A few people waved, but most merely watched impassively. Weary of war, many here deeply disapprove of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.....
Smart Vitnamese.

Bush mock serious, visiting the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command [JPAC] Hanoi. These people may be the serious bad guys depending on the extent of the CIA infiltration [Ross Perot suggested there were Special Forces left in the region to thwart POW escape and mitigation efforts, and if that's true of course they would be the real problem]. The Vietnamese are NOT the enemy.

BUSH is there now. We need the POWs, infected and rejected brought home.

Unbelievable Allen is down; this is not at all trending in the right direction.

Panhandler is Arrested in Brick Attack, Juan Forero and Jayson Blair, New York Times December 01 1999 page 1. ......The highly publicized attack immediately led to speculation by police that a person who was homeless and possibly mentally ill was responsible, and three days later Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani's administration announced that the homeless had no right to sleep in city streets and would face arrest for refusing shelter. The police have arrested more than 100 homeless people since the measure was announced.....
THAT WAS CIA ORCHESTRATION.
CORRUPT Giuliani. Tsongus down in 1992 by cancer, odds are the CIA did the same thing in 2000 intending to plant Hillary Clinton. Not a reason to give the guy a rematch in 2008 when he could have had it in 2006. He is of the SWINE, greatly increasing intrusive government in New York. Locking up the street people.
Please do not vote for him.

This is an interesting time - we go on to look at other conservatives, but there are not a lot of people out there viable in leading the Allen Faction minus Allen. McCain is not the guy. Its possible - EVEN PROBABLE - Bush offered Allen a cabinet slot before attacking him; somebody ought to make Bush deliver on it now. New Attorney General, and Allen could diminish the Patriot Act intrusions. Allen would apply for warrants, noting they always had pen searches, roving wiretaps, and 'sneak and peek' searches.
Both are effectively out of the race in 2008, Allen over the fall in 2006, and Feingold because he took himself out. Instinctively looking for reform - ending torture for instance - one might think about Feingold as Attorney General and Allen as head of the FBI, but for real, true, reform we might be better off with Allen as Attorney General and Feingold as head of the FBI if he'd take it.
The FEAR is that if you put a liberal in as Attorney General the CIA will run them off the road, even though they'll promise they won't. The problem with Allen at Attorney General is that he really would not be positioned to take down Romney over the CIA 'Big Dig' funding mechanism or the CIA gay marriage in Mass issue.

Mitt Romney used "tar baby" in answering a question about the CIA 'big dig' on 29 July 2006 in Iowa, which was followed by "Macaca" on 11 Aug 2006. Previously opposing Romney's candidacy for anything based on his 'juggled positions,' association with the Israelis [Netanyahu probably continuing through ties in Utah, indeed, that 'scenario' of relationship may have figured into resolving the residency issue], and cover up of CIA activities, this merely heightens our objection to swine-like racketeering.

BUSH IS IN VIETNAM. We want 'the POWs and all American citizens including the infected and rejected' returned to the United States, certainly prior to any trade deal or deepened relationship.
ON THE OTHER HAND, please DO NOT blame the Vietnamese or more generally the Asians. Blame exactly the CIA and maybe Henry Kissinger with collaborator George H.W. Bush.

The situation, as Bush moves a career CIA man into the Pentagon.

U.S. will train Latin American militaries; Ban lifted to offset trend to the left, Barbara Slavin, USA Today, Nov 10-12 2006. WASHINGTON - Concern about leftist victories in Latin America has prompted President Bush to quietly grant a waiver that allows the United States to resume training militaries....
Decided certainly after the results of the election were made clear to him, one wonders if George W. Bush consulted with the United States Senate in reaching that decision.
PLEASE NOTE this is a staunchly CONSERVATIVE blogspot; while appearing liberal is certainly a concern the effort to STOP BUSH is of larger immediate importance.

Initially, American military officials said the two prisoners died of natural causes. Lieutenant General Daniel McNeill, the American commander of allied troops in Afghanistan at the time, emphatically denied the prisoners had been chained to the ceiling or that they had been mistreated. Only after an investigation by the New York Times did the military acknowledge that the prisoners had been killed by U.S. soldiers, who had, among other things, suspended them from the ceiling of their isolation cells.... Guantanamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power, Joseph Margulies, Simon & Schuster, 2006 page 137.
And they deliberately killed Pat Tillman and lied about that too - these are really discouraging issues.
GET OUR GUYS OUT. The combat commands are very well managed but the war is lost; the guys on the field have skills and abilities but the special teams are trashing the stadium and deliberately destroying our fan base.

Bush Paraguay Land Grab Incites Unease
Asuncion, Oct 18 2006(Prensa Latina) The land grab project of US President George W. Bush in Chaco, Paraguay, has generated considerable discomfort both politically and environmentally.
The news circulating the continent about plans to buy 98,840 acres of land in Chaco, Paraguay, near the Triple Frontier (Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay) is the talk of the town in these countries. [That is apparently in the fairly arid western portion of Paraguay].

Although official sources have not confirmed the information that is already public, the land is reportedly located in Paso de Patria, near Bolivian gas reserves and the Guarani indigenous water region, within the Triple Border.
Alto Paraguay Gov. Erasmo Rodriguez Acosta revealed he heard that part of the land purchase consists of an ecological reserve (Fundacion Patria), with which Bush is affiliated.

In its interview with Rodriguez Acosta, neike.com.py reported that he does not have documentation of this affiliation and it could not communicate either with the foundation or with the National Rural Development and Land Institute, in charge of these state lands.
Concern increased last week with the arrival of Bush" daughter, Jenna, and a source from the Physical Planning Department saying that most of the Chaco region belongs to private companies.

Luis D"Elia, Argentina´s undersecretary for Land for Social Habitat, says the matter raises regional concern because it threatens local natural resources.
He termed it “surprising” that the Bush family is trying to settle a few short miles from the US Mariscal Estigarribia Military Base.

Argentinean Adolfo Perez Esquivel warned that the real war will be fought not for oil, but for water, and recalled that Acuifero Guaraní is one of the largest underground water reserves in South America, running beneath Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay (larger than Texas and California together).
“The southern US states are already struggling with water shortages," asserted the 1980 Nobel Peace Prizewinner.
Orlando Castillo, Paraguay Peace and Justice Service member, recalled the US military buildup in Chaco under a bilateral agreement.

SWINE BUSH: Israeli Tool

The story goes that in 1973 – “a few weeks” before the October war [presumably at some point between maybe July and September, leaning toward September] – George H.W. Bush et al ‘stole’ or anyway commandeered a C-130 for drug trafficking, and flew it like a bat out of hell across the Middle Eastern sky to Egypt – where their pursuers were forced to abandon the chase [F-105 fighters 'reluctantly' called home].

C-130 lands at Cairo to take on fuel, in what was then the midst of the SOVIET Air Force. Back Fire bombers ready to fly on Tel Aviv and push it over for the Arab cause. Tricky CIA pilot George H.W. Bush has guys sneak off the C-130 and plant homing devices in the sand around the airport which was the whole point of the mission. Israelis were able to strip EVERYTHING off their fighters except slave guidance to the homing devices and weapons, and when the war started they annihilated the SOVIET Air Force on the ground in Egypt.

Guess who was flying the lead F-105 in pursuit of the C-130. George W. Bush, son of the C-130 pilot or anyway that’s the story on the street. Gold Stars of David for all in profusion when the October war was subsequently won. Continued slavery for the Egyptian people under the CIA tool Mubarak goes unmentioned; true to their word, George H.W. Bush et al supposedly did continue on their way to use the C-130 in drug trafficking.

Taken with a grain of salt, it would have been after George H. W. Bush was in the United Nations, but before he was implanted or had served in Beijing; it also would have been WHILE George W. Bush was a National Guard pilot and may explain his affinity for the F-105. The source is seemingly well placed for the story [lives in a shelter which is almost the same as a CIA paycheck voucher with verified identification badge. Interestingly, he claims the CIA under Bush laid away $120,000 dollars for him, but President-elect Senator Clinton somehow managed to get her hands on it or anyway re-appropriated the money for other purposes, hardly an endearing trait for CIA agents and maybe a harbinger of things to come]. Bush is swine – all of them without exception; in parallel to serving as tools for the Kissinger Israeli interests, transitioning Tuskegee syphilis experimentation to Vietnam and abandoning U.S. troops there.

Kerry and the swine liberals were barking up the wrong tree on George W. ducking his National Guard service. They had it exactly wrong. He flew much more than they claim he did, and much of it represented corruption and betrayal. A different source says he [Bush] also flew A-10 in Vietnam, which almost certainly was for the CIA and may have been after the Americans had conceptually evacuated. Probably bombed Laos or something.

Was Vietnam intentionally fought and lost, and was JFK aware of that impending plan – and intending to mitigate that with deployed Special Forces rather than heavy concentrations of ground troops? How about more recently blowing down the shrine in Samarra – when are we going to hear about that? Indicators here [Washington D.C.] are the Israelis did it, in trying to force us to maintain ground troops in the Middle East.

With agencies like the CIA we don’t need enemies.

SWINE BUSH

U.S. will train Lating American militaries; Ban lifted to offset trend toward left, Barbara Slavin, USA Today, Nov. 10-12, 2006. WASHINGTON - Concern about leftist victories in Latin America has prompted President Bush to quietly grant a waiver that allows the United States to resume training militaries....

Fidel Castro and communism in Cuba was a very cynical swap for restoration of the Shah in 1953 - promptly followed by Castro's first attack on Batista or literally an army barracks, now with Chavez brought to power as Castro is in decline. They're even running the Sandinistas again. SHAMEFUL that Chris Dodd lets the imposter President get away with all that [anyway the 'repressing the peasants' part], but then again First Female Speaker of the House Pelosi took away the Senate's balls.

ABRUPTLY AWARE OF THE RACKETEERING AFTER ORIGINALLY HAVING SUPPORTED THE WAR IN IRAQ, we say to bring the troops ALL home without leaving a ground force in the Middle East to protect Israel which increasingly appears to be the larger political motivation behind the intervention.

HUMOR. The Israeli lobby NOW trying to represent the summer's attack on Lebanon as a disaster with angst verbiage, when in fact it nicely accomplished all of their objectives and they're busy putting condos up on the Golan.

CIA transitioning Tuskegee-era syphilis testing to Vietnam as it was ending in the United States, and holding infected POWs - now - ongoing 2006 - well after the war ended, as Swine Bush makes relations between the United States and Vietnam routine.

Tom Harkin was in on it from the beginning, and Webb picked it up no later than the mid-1980s [but didn't support Perot on it in 1992]. Webb's wife is in on it. The problem is not that they're 'bad people.' It's that they're NOT TRYING to BRING THE GUYS HOME.

When Congress comes back, FORCE BUSH OUT. The Senate looked like a bunch of monkeys at the Roberts confirmation hearings – did Bush threaten anybody on the night of September 19th 2005 or morning of the 20th? Pelosi doesn't want to impeach Bush, and she's trying to take it "off the table." Can Pelosi give away the Senate’s confirmation of important nominees? It is possible to muscle a nominee passed the Senate if you make it real clear you will knock the crap out of anybody who challenges the guy? Could Bush do that for the UN Ambassador he wants?

Two or three Senators – maybe anonymous – complain to the House, which holds a closed hearing and declares “there is cause to impeach President George W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors including threatening members of the United States Senate on September 19/20th 2005.” Senate votes the guy out. Ought to take part of two consecutive days. Unless Pelosi thinks threatening the Senate – while unfortunate – is simply not that big a deal. In which case Bush could be impeached over the attacks on Rehnquist 2004 [inducing cancer] and May and July 2005. Unless Pelosi thinks that isn’t such a big deal either.

For the sake of the argument, supposing the majority of Senators oppose physical violence directed at the senior figures in other branches of government – and are able to overcome a stubborn minority of Senators who would turn a blind eye or turn the other cheek - how would you maximize the impeachment process? Bush hasn’t got the POWs back yet, and while that should not be abruptly the cause of a ‘freeze’ or a huge step back – severing all ties - we might not want to press forward in normalizing relations with Vietnam until the prisoners – all native born Americans held POW or otherwise abandoned, betrayed, infected, blah blah blah – are returned to these United States. Do not BLAME the Vietnamese – BLAME the CIA. BLAME the ISRAELI lobby that pulls the strings. Does Hong Le Webb – Jim Webb’s wife – give the Vietnamese money to support the Americans held prisoner? That is shameful, and it definitely sounds like something George H.W. Bush cooked up.
We need to bring them home - as opposed to what? Having furtive American prisoners cowering around Vietnam, trying to hide for fear of incurring beatings and losing whatever privileges they’ve managed to earn in captivity across thirty years ? The one guy in Con Son had been in since 1966. That would be forty years. They probably will not come running up to Westerners begging for freedom. That was so 1980s. And they probably were beaten and harshly treated for trying that, and they’ve been told time and again they can’t leave and dimly realize they won’t be able to get a passport anyway, so now they probably just cower and answer monosyllable. What do the Vietnamese call them – have they given the American POWs new names? Yes. Is that a form of torture – in our newly written manual, do we prohibit making long term prisoners answer to new names? In the 1980s military the guys could not pronounce long names [maybe that's changed in the big bonus-era]– at GITMO do we expect the prisoners to answer to kind of abbreviated versions of their names? If the Red Cross inspector sees us doing it and then continues on to Vietnam, they won’t be surprised to find the Vietnamese doing it. Working in Tokyo, even very well intended Japanese had problems saying fairly short Western names [five and six letters long].

POWs are honor-bound to resist and to lead resistance, but what about deliberately betrayed POWs? Is there an expectation they also will continue to resist? Does the military still train for ‘name, rank, and serial number’ only? We need to bring the Americans held in Asia home now. Throw it in the impeachment and blame it on Bush and his dad. CIA. Swine.

If one of the photographed prisoners was an infected American [and we think one probably was]we suspect its this one [above], who looks almost Negro and may be a legacy of Tuskegee-type experimentation [described in the archive CIA Attack Upon America].

The American, Frank W. ("Red") Walton, may have been CIA.

The CIA Attack On America 2006-2008

2006-09-30T07:13:00.000-07:00

....In the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who would become the first female speaker in history, called for harmony and said Democrats would not abuse their new status.
She said she would be "the speaker of the House, not the speaker of the Democrats." She said Democrats would aggressively conduct oversight of the administration, but said any talk of impeachment of President Bush "is off the table."

Well, that's the deal they cut. Greatly appreciate your awareness and participation. Unfortunate ending to a CIA operation; it is their turf and they caught Allen blind. In truth he had gone too far down the road with them in supporting Mike Luttig for example, and that might have led them to seeing him as vulnerable. Obviously we will be watching Webb's voting pattern and moves to normalize relations with Vietnam, hoping we get our guys back.

PLEASE OPPOSE FORMER NEW YORK MAYOR GIULIANI.
PLEASE OPPOSE JEB BUSH.
PLEASE OPPOSE MITT ROMNEY.

Not as often, but hopefully now and again this blog will keep going; obviously Bush is still swine. Now more than ever. Rumsfeld was not the problem - Bush is the problem [our indicators are that he blew down the shrine in Samarra or gave it the 'green light', not Rumsfeld or Cheney]. Gates was promised the Pentagon years ago while he was still out in McLean; almost funny, Bush can't let Rumsfeld resign without trying to leverage it in corruption. CIA at the head of the military command is not a reform movement; of course we hope the officer corps will actively work to defend itself.

My name is Andrew Bestor and again, I greatly appreciate all consideration of bizarre CIA attack mechanisms and the ongoing violations of Title 50, United States Codes, Section 401 et seq. Thank you.

CIA transitioning Tuskegee-era syphilis testing to Vietnam as it was ending in the United States, and holding infected POWs - now - ongoing 2006 - well after the war ended, as Swine Bush makes relations between the United States and Vietnam routine.

Tom Harkin was in on it from the beginning, and Webb picked it up no later than the mid-1980s [but didn't support Perot on it in 1992]. Webb's wife is in on it. The argument here is not that they're 'bad people.' It's that they're the wrong people.

If one of the photographed prisoners was an infected American [and we think one probably was]we suspect its this one [above], who looks almost Negro and may be a legacy of Tuskegee-type experimentation [described below].

The American, Frank W. ("Red") Walton, may have been CIA.

All of that is background to the race for the United States Senate from Virginia 2006, with a look toward the race for the presidency 2008. Indications are that they ain't lying about it. Within reason, if you can catch Webb - you can ask him about this. He isn't 'bad' - or at least we don't claim he is. He's wrong. Also, we'd like to know where his wife works.

Welcome. The blogspot begins at the end, documenting our 'sequence of awareness.'

Too prejudicial for campaign. What we’re willing to tell you now that the voting is over.

Liberal Democrats are killing the black people. Actually, they’re killing us all. AIDS, wasting diseases, and other invidious activities of the CIA – the beginning of a schematic history. Can’t get around them; it is Bill and Hillary Clinton at the heart of perpetuating 'The New World Order.'

Webb himself is PERHAPS in on transitioning the Tuskegee blood research project to Vietnam, and on the continued imprisonment of about 2000 POWs [1800?]. His wife [Hong Le Webb] MAY BE also tied to it; indeed that issue might have factored into their meeting and marriage.
Does anybody know where Hong Le Webb works? She's a lawyer working in securities brought forward as George W. Little Kid makes relations with Vietnam routine, but no one has said where she works. She definitely has not denied contacts or even work with the Vietnamese government.
At a superficial level MKULTRA is a recognized CIA designator or overview nomenclature for a research effort targeting man in his environment. Some financial paperwork and internal documentation survives, but the contractor reporting and deliverables were conceptually destroyed as Richard Helms left for Tehran in 1973 - both evading responsibility for cooking up Watergate and as a precursor to taking down the Shah.

Subproject 24 was superficially a 1954 designation for an educational meeting - and that is all the Agency will admit to. Really the subproject appears to have represented Agency involvement in the Tuskegee blood testing, transitioned to Vietnam as the effort in the States was winding down as ultimately recognized by Bill Clinton - with no mention of CIA involvement or ongoing experimentation/research monitoring in Vietnam.
In that sense, 'what they admit to' versus 'what they are not' is the tip of a HUGE iceberg threatening us all 2006, and really driving to the heart of the liberal CIA Democrat conundrum. Not only does it back into AIDS, but it backs into American POWs being held in Vietnam and subjected to medical experimentation [specifically a wasting disease], the American cancer rate and genetic engineering of grains and alteration of our food supply essentially by or at the behest of the CIA.

CIA MKULTRA Subproject 24. Memo dated 04 August 1954 [to/from redacted]. In response to your request.... [medical citations provided]. George Wolf, Assistant Professor, University of Illinois. "Chemical Induction of Cancer", 1953. see esp. 29, 44 etc. By means of a special genetic technique, Strong, JK.C.I.5, 339, 1945 induced tumors with methylcholanthrene in many different tissues. Methyl Cholanthrene is a good initiator (high tumor incidence) and a good promoter (short latent period) -p.85 Wolf.
..... If this hydrocarbon can be produced in the laboratory by chemical transformations of normal constituents of the human organism, it is possible that the substance may arise in the body through a process of abnormal metabolism - and initiate cancer [underlined].

.....Carl Max Hasselmann and Hans Otto Johne in Arch. Dermato & Syphilis 188, 693-707, 1950 reported primary multiple skin carcinoma with simultaneous tertiary syphilis. Disturbances of the cholesterol metabolism, present in syphilis cases of long standing, as well as cancer cases are discussed with respect to the chemical reaction between the physiological substances [ ] and the cancerogenic substances [ ].....

A guess is that the blacks were selected not out of strictly speaking 'racism' but because historically the group tends to have high cholesterol.

Peter Buxtun went through a series of efforts over the course of several years trying to 'out' the Tuskegee program, with awareness dating from the late sixties to final publication by an Associated Press reporter named Jean Heller on July 25 1972 - at which point the story exploded. The overall sequence very much sounds like it was CIA manipulated, implying the Agency was active in the program from 1954 to 1972 [supported by MKSEARCH/2 documentation]. It is possible Mr. Buxtun may be able to identify key participants [maybe CIA people] based on orchestrated denials or partial releases of data in that time period.
How it went down:
1968. Concern raised about ethics of study.
1969. CDC reaffirms need for study.
1970. First news articles condemn Tuskegee study [but gains support of local medical society which sounds like CIA adjudication], and after that the CIA played hot and cold faucets until Jean Heller ‘somehow got the story to break’ nation-wide.
July 1970 [ALSO]. Tom Harkin goes to Con Son, the island prison off the coast of Vietnam, with Hawkins and Anderson [Congressmen] along with Don Luce and Frank Walton who presumably were associated with the CIA. Harkin takes photographs which get published in Life [magazine]. Somehow those photographs fit into the continuity paradigm but we need to review them before commenting.
July 25 1972 Tuskegee story breaks. This is not to say either Jean Heller or Peter Buxtun are CIA, were planted by or for the CIA, or are in any way associated with the CIA.
Pre-1973 evacuation of American troops. 2006 we have credible reports of rumors about Black Syph or Black Clap [venereal diseases resisting penicillin] circulating among troops in Vietnam during the war, alleging infected soldiers would be left on Con Son or on an unnamed island in the Philippines and not permitted to return to the United States.
The continuity of the syphilis issue is the point; was MKULTRA Subproject 24 transitioned across the MKSEARCH era via the infected troops in Vietnam. WE THINK YES.
April 1975 Hong Le Webb ‘evacuated’ Vung Tau by fishing boat and is picked up by the United States Navy.
1975 [ALSO]. Con Son prison was conceptually closed with the fall of South Vietnam, noting the islands [Con Dao island group] are remote and access is limited even today by both practical and regulatory concerns.
Bobby Garwood CIA manipulation issue apparently designed to further a situational dominance paradigm.
1986/1987. American prisoners evacuated from Vietnam, hospitalized in the Philippines, and returned to Vietnam in a condition of captivity.
October 1992. Ross Perot [failed] October Surprise bid to free or ‘repatriate’ at least several Americans apparently living as escaped POWs in Thai/Burmese border area [Perot is prohibited by the CIA from doing that or publicizing the issue].
Mid 1990s. Hong Le and Jim Webb marry. Bill Clinton begins to ‘revisit’ Tuskegee issue with conceptual apologies and vaginal statements effectively evading recognition of the ongoing problem. Clinton certainly DOES NOT ever recognize any continuity in CIA MKULTRA testing whether or not it is Subproject 24 as we suspect.
Clinton narrowly avoids being impeached.
2006. Bush moves to normalize relations with Vietnam, while continuing the Clinton policy of lies and evasion regarding the possibility of POWs being found alive in general and on any CIA efforts to induce a wasting disease in particular never mind the larger effort to compromise the human immune system.

Your awareness is appreciated. Please keep up the good fight.

A BIZARRE insider look at the CIA takeover of government in Virginia, and they are swine liars. In a sneaky disinformation ploy, ‘the CIA,’ presumably speaking through executives or other credible sources, tried to claim they weren’t involved in the attack on Allen which is crap anyway because Tester is their guy [and Obama apparently supported him – Tester - at a fundraiser in San Francisco after announcing his own potential presidential candidacy on television; better buy a score card if you want to follow this game], but Hong Le Webb is filthy in it. Sure she came out on a stage with all the liberals – they’re probably all in it. They may have even held her back to flash her at the end of the campaign but the Washington Post doesn’t really provide us a standard for judging the 'appearance sequence.'

Actually, the comparison is faintly insulting to Valerie Plame who only looked at Yellow Cake and set up a trap to try and take down senior government officials – even Plame didn’t have the audacity to then make an attempt to plant herself IN the senior slots. Incredible.

Contemporary ‘rumors’ during the war and our recent source suggests ‘deliberately infected’ POWs were held on an island off the coast of Vietnam – and betrayed. Left there when the Americans pulled out which in time represents continuity in the Tuskegee types of experimentation only here in a wasting disease [Hans-Whatever Syndrome with one image sequence known to exist] rather than a blood disease and cancer potentials in the terminal stages of syphilis. The island group is off her hometown. Webb met her in the mid-1990s when he’d been in on it for a decade though after Perot had made his move and lost, and she’d at least conceptually fled in 1975 though its possible the family was placed in the refugee flow as a cover – with the CIA all things are possible and equally plausible. Now she’s a securities lawyer in it.

Question: did they TIME normalization of relations with Vietnam to the attack on Allen. This is just breathtaking stuff – is it possible to waterboard her? Or waterboard them? The heightened tension interrogations – are those only for use on foreign nationals? Can they pick up an error on her citizenship application which could open the door?

Webb should have withdrawn. He really never should have run in the first place and he knew it. They couldn’t just put her on the commission to normalize United States and Vietnamese securities trading? No. Bush is swine, and he maximizes his effectivity in it. Counterintuitive to decent people, he does not minimize his affiliation with it or his affinity for it.

Vote for Allen. Definitely vote, and definitely vote for Allen, but do not let this drop. Is it possible to catch Webb at a party and gang up on him – is he around Virginia enough for senior military guys to catch him? What a wasted campaign – it is unbelievable he blew all that limelight, though obviously that’s the CIA paradigm. What swine to think he could get away with that.

Obama is none too impressive either. Sweet Jesus – what is our nation coming to, that the guy would only narrowly get on base after the CIA buried Jack Ryan in Chicago 2004 to turn around, peddle his ass up and down the eastern seaboard endorsing the entire CIA slate in 2006, and promptly run for the presidency in 2008. Audacity.

Senator Allen. Please end so-called ‘No Child Left Behind’ [No Child Advance Unmonitored], repeal Oxley-Sarbanes, publicize and ultimately prosecute CIA violations of Title 50 seq 401 et seq., and blow these swine out of the water. Webb should have withdrawn; he still has a chance to do the honorable thing off the Key Bridge. Forrestal was Secretary of the Navy and Webb emerges unscathed? Clearly our Navy is not what it used to be. Force Bush out, and force him out now. Just start talking and do not stop. Do not let this drop or walk away from it.

What an unbelievable experience.

Late breaking Sunday UPDATE: Word on the streets of D.C. is that Webb's wife, Hong Le Webb, is in on the POW issue. We don't know how - she's a securities lawyer and may arrange payments from the United States to the Vietnamese government for holding the Americans prisoner. Pictured below with a couple of liberals capable of rationalizing that type of thing.

This is almost beyond belief. Raw audacity the Democrats would run the guy; this may be something the New York Israeli lobby cooked up and used Schumer [conceptually responsible for selecting and vetting the Democrat's Senate candidates] as their tool in implementing. They pay lip service to Howard Dean's effort in all fifty states, but they clearly are not on the same sheet of music.

PLEASE vote, and PLEASE support George Allen. It's Sunday at 11:30 p.m. Can you get people out of bed on this?

Hanoi; specifically the lake with the island where the main body of POWs were suppose to have been kept.

Webb is wrong, don’t vote for him, and move on in your life – we THOUGHT the period of major accusations was over. We THOUGHT we’d deadline or max the gauges by now, but it only gets worse. Webb can only be as bad as he is; the problem is that we’re realizing there are many more ways to leverage the guy than is immediately apparent. Bush is swine. Bush is continual swine, and ever deepening swine. Every time you access this blog you know ‘Bush is swine.’

Webb moved into the Navy slot right around the time ninety something American POWs, betrayed by Kissinger and left in Southeast Asia, were flown to Subic Bay, nursed back to health at the Navy hospital there, AND RETURNED to Vietnam in a condition of captivity. The POWs tried to get the staff at the hospital to help them and the staff wouldn’t. They lifted in and lifted out on C-130s, and a guess is that Elizabeth Dole has the inside line. Red Cross was in on it, and to this day apparently has access to them.

Webb’s wife – belatedly introduced to the campaign – is an ethnic Vietnamese practicing as a securities lawyer in Washington D.C. as Bush is opening with the Vietnamese, or normalizing relations. Bush wants her husband in the Senate as a tie to the Vietnamese; how can Webb go along with that?
Understand the wife made the man attractive to them; do not doubt that.
AND they’ve still got our POWs. Word has it about 2,000.

'Voters knew my wife was Vietnamese,' says Webb.
Yeah, but they didn't know you were in active conspiracy on the POW's, you ***hole.

Heckler jumps Allen and got tossed which wasn’t great, but how many people would have questions for Webb and his wife if they shared awareness? Beyond mere heckling, would they tar and feather and ride the pair of them out of town on a rail – the disparities in this Senate race are absolute and stunning. The betrayal. Sure Bush is swine, but at some point you have to say that Webb is swine too for going along with it. He didn’t last long in the Navy slot and apparently resigned in a fight with the Bush-tool and swine Frank Carlucci who also had CIA credentials behind him.
Was the fight over the POWs rather than over the size of the Navy – either way Webb is swine for not coming clean on it, AND in running for elected office at the behest of Bush when he knows that EVERYBODY – Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese and Russians – knows he isn’t clean with his constituents on it. Swine. In fact the only people who do not know are his potential constituents.

Please support Allen 2006.

Swift Boat Veterans Against Kerry? Swine, but understand there is a foundation of real hostility beneath that to the extent people are aware of gaming with the POWs still trapped. Its surprising some Marines haven’t taken Webb out, gotten him drunk, and thrown him through the juke box.

“The POWs tried to get the staff at the hospital at Subic Bay to help them and the staff wouldn’t,”
presumably because the staff was partially CIA and the ones that weren’t CIA were threatened with the warrant-less domestic surveillance mechanism targeting family and friends. Smirking Asians standing outside the house; CIA might have done that just for practice and as a way of leveraging the Philippine situation ‘in the lower 48’ so to speak. A small display of force will quickly silence the activist bystander.
That’s why the Marines should have thrown Webb through the juke box.

Why you read this blogspot daily. An image sequence was broadcast [we saw it], possibly live but more likely digital stored. Past gaunt; a skeletal frame with the flesh rotted off him, the guy had been deliberately infected with Hans-[Something] Syndrome. Didn’t catch the second word in the hyphenated name but thought it began with the letter ‘s.’ Wore a hat and rain coat and sun glasses; he has so little flesh he was defined by that - hat, coat and glasses. Cheek bones and skeletal lower jaw. They can’t have underwear on him – he must wear some kind of diaper. Swine Webb, swine Bush. Approximate to the time of the sighting, a source in Washington D.C. who usually talks about energy fields and street surveillance tactics abruptly said that some Vietnam-era POWs had been deliberately infected via a venereal disease and had been left on an island off the coast of Vietnam because they were contagious. The source never returned to the subject which presumably was ‘validation’ of a fashion, or anyway never went beyond the initial statement suggesting someone had put them up to saying it and it was not their expertise. On the other hand, typically the CIA floats something at least peripherally true on the internet to tip awareness, and a search six months ago didn’t find anything.

Please oppose Webb. Please support Allen.

The ringing fire alarm website: ‘This is an emergency. Please support Allen.’

Shown is the lake and island which we think is where the main body of POWs were initially held. Sad betrayal; we hear Bobby Garwood was a CIA orchestration. Book Kiss The Boys Goodbye dealt with the subject in detail; given the image sequence, the source on the venereal disease, and a misinformation effort on the bus returning from the National Archives in Maryland which wouldn’t otherwise warrant mention [State Department] we’re pretty sure its true.
Media support: The Wall Street Journal pursued the POW story with some diligence across the '70s and '80s, suggesting the implications of the situation have not gone unnoticed in the larger trade arena, and a guess is that freeing POWs was Ross Perot's 'October Surprise' in 1992, but they - swine Bush - wouldn't let him.

ASK Webb. Go ahead and ask him. VOTE for Allen.

Wall Street Journal reported a Canadian offer to serve as intermediaries suggesting others saw the recovery scenario as viable [probably Jan. 21 1987]. The North Vietnamese understood they would not be able to utilize radar and electronic warfare technicians to their full potential which leads to the assumption there was a Chinese interface. Presumably they're held under some kind of house arrest, and by now may have all been returned to Vietnam though there is some question on that - outside indicators are not clear, and the POWs may have preferred China to Vietnam.

'Brightlights' is either the American term for the prisoners or the name of the 5th Special Forces teams certainly in the region conceptually trying to recover the Americans [obviously now doubting the Special Forces was genuine in the effort but probably using the excuse to stay over there].
"Buon Nhans" or Chosen-by-God-to-stay 'in a dialect used in the region held by General Khun Sa' is one of the Asian terms. "Thuoc Hoa Va Ho Chi Minh" or Blessed by God and Ho Chi Minh may be Vietnamese circa 1980s which may also have been an example of an atheist government corrupting an existing religious perspective in assuming legitimacy.

Nomenclature is very important - nobody knows anything until you get exactly the right word. YES - we do want the POWS/MIAs returned [alive] to the United States [now], but we are NOT accusing Asians of relative dishonesty [returning the POWs is actually relative honesty] because we previously accepted the relative dishonesty and called it honesty when we knew it was not.
We accuse guys like WEBB and his wife of the dishonesty, and he knows it and it makes him nervous. Swine.

Please vote, and please vote for Senator Allen. Oppose all cheating at the polls.

Russ Feingold – occasional scowl - is the face of the Democratic Party for anybody who is serious about the Democratic Party. This is not the new face of the Democratic Party. This is an upstart kid who spoke well his first time at bat. Was Howard Dean consulted before they sent him to Virginia?

Webb has run the most divisive campaign in memory – not against Allen but against himself. Did he produce a single speaker who opposed gun control ? There are two Virginias, and Webb invariably trashes one for the other.

Maybe it does originate in a jocular sports background; Allen’s charm is that he doesn’t trash one half of the team for the other.

Senator Allen is going to win on November 7th, because people vote their jobs and not “one starry night.”

Had they been asked, both Dean and Feingold would have told them not to bet the ranch on ‘one starry night.’ Hillary Clinton has strong negatives, but she would have told them not to bet ‘one starry night.’

What really happened in Virginia 2006 ? Challenger Webb based his strategy on conspiracy, building off what he knew was in the wind - the ‘Allen Blunder.’ The PROBLEM with that is it drove him to finish liberal when he could have finished conservative; he had a blank slate.
Allen on the other hand was defined, and Webb let him retreat into his successful accomplishments rather than challenging him on so-called ‘No Child Left Behind’ which is really ‘No Child Advance Unmonitored’ or the Bush plan to privatize social security for example. Our problem – this is not an anti-Webb blog or even a conservative blog; this is a vehemently anti-Bush blog and in failing to attack on the real issues Webb let Bush walk away unscathed.

Say what you want about J. Edgar Hoover; he was happy in his office, really never represented himself as being anything other than what he was, and never tried to run for Congress [or assert ‘situational dominance’ over the larger democratic process]. To the contrary, Hoover actually worried about his guys getting caught without warrants. What we have in Hastings and Webb [note the parallels in time] is raw, unmitigated, contempt. They will endlessly game – they already have engaged in what are by any standard ‘elaborate deceptions,’ and we’re sorry but there is “nothing you can do about it.” Oh yes there is. Don’t vote for them.

Webb is trying to minimize his involvement, but it isn't his call. It's Bush's call. Webb might not have seen participation in the domestic surveillance mechanism as central to his role in the Department of Defense, but Bush definitely did. The evidence - Webb got the tap on the shoulder. He's here. It's him. Circumstantial but compelling.

Footnote for the Hoover buff. Charles McNary, Frank Knox, and Wendall Willkie all died in 1944 as Dewey sought the nomination and then ran against FDR. The previous contenders were eliminated [Alf Landon had surrendered without a fight]; in fact the speed of the American drive across France to open the Swiss border allowed Allen Dulles to return to the States where he is known to have been around when Willkie’s life ended. You would dismiss that as coincidence but then Harry Truman won the narrowest of upset victories against Dewey in 1948; Hoover didn’t miss much and one wonders if he tipped it or was in on it. You don’t tip TOWARDS the CIA; you tip AWAY FROM the CIA.

Webb is wrong, and Allen is right.

Please support Allen and oppose Webb.

In their wildest accusations, don’t let them characterize the Hastings situation [and by default in time, the Hastings-Webb issue] as some kind of conservative attack. It’s a Ruth Marcus attack out of the Washington Post, Pelosi’s Unintelligent Choice, November 01 2006 page A21 but at this point we’re trying to leave Pelosi out of it believing she is just a dupe. It is long past time for Hastert to go, but sad the Democrats will replace him with a dupe.

On each and every occasion, oppose cheating at the polls.

Herndon, we have a problem. Jim Webb – Michael Fox, Bob Kerrey, Barak Obama, the rest of them – have confused Virginia with Detroit. There is NOTHING more offensive than a liberal being liberal while at the very same time sucking down the big defense budget.

John DeCamp says Bob Kerrey looted a bank in Nebraska and he wrote a book about it which makes for a compelling read – there are problems in the cast of characters – but even if there weren’t, they hugely misjudge Virginia in one critical regard.

Virginians aren’t hypocrites. You be you. We be we [previously living in McLean].

Actually, there is one thing more offensive than being liberal on the big defense dollar. It’s being liberal on the big government security agency budget. Classified, surveillance, Black Ops, answering the phones at the office “Hello?” when everybody else in the world says their name, or actually being a domestic operative/affiliate planted/posted somewhere like the ACLU or working in a nebulous cause like ‘women’s rights’ or ‘opposing torture’ at the behest of the CIA – and at least implicitly denying it every day. There are some swine in the northern Virginia suburbs and they may vote for Webb which would only make them double swine.

There are problems in the United States Senate – we won’t be sorry to see Frist go. Pennsylvania wants a change and the lobbying community in the District of Columbia has exploded, doubling in size under Bush – maybe Pennsylvania should change.

George Allen is the solution – Jim Webb [who is significantly associated with a warrant-less domestic surveillance mechanism all those guest speakers would pretend to abhor except they don’t think you’re ever going to call them on it] is part of the problem.

By any conventional standard Allen should be more vulnerable than he really is - supporting Allen we would none-the-less concede that Virginia is entitled to two choices while this year they only have one. Allen is a candidate; Webb is a conspiracy. That point does not reflect well on the national Democratic party, and don’t blame Howard Dean. Charles Schumer was in charge of recruiting candidates: CIA Tester Montana, warrant-less surveillance Webb, Lamont-who-seems-to-fit-into-the-paradigm-and-certainly-his-supporters-do of Connecticut. Don’t even ask what was on Schumer's mind.
How has it come to this, though? Webb is being driven to being much more ‘liberal than he naturally is’ which is luckily happening in campaign before it would inevitably happen on the Senate floor, so in this case at least the voter actually can make an informed decision. The conspiracy played their cards too young.

George Allen is better. George Allen is the candidate to support. Please vote, and please vote for George Allen. Strictly as a footnote, we admit Webb could have run better on his own visiting Marine bases and college campuses – Washington & Lee to the cadet corps at VMI to the technology at Virginia Tech to the women’s colleges with the real accomplishments in education which Virginia naturally represents. He’s blown the campaign with the fly-by visits from the out of town, out of touch liberals, but that would have happened on the floor of the Senate anyway. Forewarned is forearmed. Virginia, you’ve seen it and you know.

Please vote for George Allen.

And so we discover Hastings was a fraud, and the standard for judicial misconduct in the District of Columbia is entirely bogus. CIA gaming including with a fixed jury in the federal courts - what swine. Diminishing to our democracy and enabling - or in some degree legitimizing - repression in China, their activity is egregious and must be totally opposed every day, everywhere, every chance.

Please oppose the CIA takeover of Congress.

Oppose their tool Jim Webb.

Support Senator Allen.

Why gaming in the courts is wrong - starting this blogspot in opposition to their racketeering, there was no intent to raise legal arguments against the liberals. Where they go we can only follow, arguing their work is counterproductive and ultimately traps the people it was intended to save.

The 372(c) [now 351] is the lowest form of hopeless. Abandoned. Betrayed by liberals; Ronald Reagan never left the Democratic Party - they left him. Now - knowing Hastings was entirely a game - you can read this 372(c) at your leisure, thinking "there but for the grace of God go I."

Or you can just support Senator Allen and oppose the CIA fix Jim Webb.

.....Approaching 28 USCS 372, in In the MATTER of a CHARGE OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY 137 F.3d 650 (D.C. Cir. 1998) the District of Columbia is unambiguous at 651, “A judicial misconduct proceeding, however, is not an appropriate venue by which to challenge the propriety of a judicial decision.”

Previous 28 USCS 372 litigation in the District of Columbia has seemed fairly limited, based on a newspaper article about two Senators having lunch with a remote Judge MATTER 39 F3d 374 (1994) [though in terms of finite documentation that one is tough to beat], a Judge’s wife working as a receptionist for a Senator inquiring of the Secretary of Commerce MATTER 85 F3d 701 (1996), and a general grievance about an independent prosecutor ‘sexed up’ with an allegation about a Judge and unauthorized wiretapping and electronic surveillance more-or-less attached trying to fit into the statute (unsuccessful) MATTER 137 F3d 650 (1998).

The exception of course is Hastings v. Judicial Council of U.S. 829 F.2d 91 (D.C. Cir 1987) where two judges signed the Complaint against Hastings and it took five more – armed with grand jury documentation – to tackle him. Perhaps not appreciating subtle nuances in law, the untrained eye sees Hastings very much as all or nothing – conceptually a case will go back to the same judge unless the litigant is successful in inflicting serious career damage on the guy, which [I] argued [wa]s not fair to either [me] or the judge, made no allowance for what [I] maintain[ed] are [my] unique and compelling circumstances, and [I] claim that is also contrary to the intent of the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act passed October 15 1980. Citing James R. Browning, Evaluating Judicial Performance and Related Matters 90 F.D.R. 197, 205 (1981) “Conceding that almost all judges are almost perfect almost all the time, it is still true that on occasion a particular judge should not sit on a particular case. The statutory mechanisms for accomplishing this result are ineffective. Statutory provisions for disqualification for cause have been interpreted narrowly. Motions for disqualification are seldom granted [denied in a particular case]. Appeal from the denial of such motions are rarely successful. There is a need, but there is no effective remedy.”

That was still true ten years later, citing Richard L. Marcus, Who Shall Discipline Federal Judges and How? 149 F.R.D. 37 (1993) which discussing numerous complaints pages 378 to 389. Outcomes can be summarized as a handful of judges hustled into retirement, some dismissals, and a number of findings that corrective actions had already been taken, but not one single reassignment. Why should [I] undertake the 28 U.S.C.S. 372(c) process – as ably demonstrated by Mr. Marcus, and the subsequent Matters litigation in the District of Columbia stretching across the next decade [perhaps as originally argued exactly by those who now oppose me], it is utterly futile. Except [this case] is different, and in fairness to the others Browning in 90 F.R.D. at 240 notes the federal Act was drawn up “not to ferret out and punish offending judges but to improve the functioning of the court by solving administrative problems.” From their perspective that is arguably what the Clinton administration tried to do in litigating Matters regarding special prosecutors. Trying to avert the threatened reassignment [I] wanted to ferret out and punish but ALSO raise larger process issues. ‘The judge as an issue’ disparate from the plaintiff’s issues with the defendants in a possible appeal is not the judge’s fault – would the Court turn [an] [a]ppeal into a disciplinary action concerning the judge? The judge is not responsible for the race to the bottom. An administrative query might well find the judge already took corrective action – he’s a fool if he hasn’t [ ] – but that’s too late for [me] getting radiated in the eyes April 14, 2004. If [the judge] had permitted discovery TWO YEARS AGO at [my] own expense we would be past this part by now.
A better opposing argument would ask why [I] don’t caption [the judge] in the 42:1986 Complaint, and while [I] certainly thought about it [I] suspect the judge’s immunities would make the action futile. Court is suppose to involve substantive actions and not mere gestures, right? More generally, suing the judge is very typically a pro se action and fuels bias in the federal courts which this Court cannot be blind to. Hard rocks for the ship in the storm.

How many of their victims are able to litigate against the CIA?
Damning are the classic conspiracy cases United States v. Guest 383 US 745, 16 L ed 2d 239, 86 S Ct 1170 (March 28, 1966) and United States v. Price 383 US 787, 16 L ed 2d 267, 86 S Ct 1152 (also March 28 1966) with the significant manpower mobilization, focus, and media coverage. There the government cared. By comparison, the conspiracy here is entirely out of reach. While setting up high tech devices, radiating [me], and sharing the fruits of the effort is a popular pastime in Washington D.C., the moment [I] attempted to reverse the situation monitoring either [the judge] or the defendants [I] would get in so much trouble it would be unbelievable. And media coverage in [the case] – certainly a fascinating situation - is being kept artificially sparse.

Undeniable is that the law feigns virtue in claiming “any person” can initiate a 28 USCS 372(c) action, but in Hastings it took two federal judges to start the ball rolling and five more who knew what evidence they wanted and where it was located to tackle him....

Should [I] have sought an injunction? Against a seated federal judge? [I am] a white middle-aged college graduate with no previous convictions – were [I] a young black high school drop-out with several convictions how far would that fly?

Law outside the District of Columbia includes at least one case which might be obliquely interpreted as an exception to the general rule of only losers litigating Judicial Disability: from the 4th Circuit in 1986 Matter 795 F.2d 379, “this complaint presents the rather remarkable phenomenon of a successful litigant whose complaint is that the success was not speedy enough and that the district judge, the subject of the complaint, engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the Courts in the process of deciding for the complainant.” Even here a winner perceived themselves as having been a loser, but a close reading of the opinion goes on to outline a long term libel/ first amendment issue between the judge and a newspaper which had been a persistent critic.
While big politicians in the 28 USCS 372(c) actions typical in the District of Columbia have money in defense funds – or supporters may work with the attorneys, or the attorneys may forgive the debt or make other arrangements - there is a significant expense associated with that action for more typical litigants and this Court cannot be blind to that.

[I call the theory they articulate ‘Public Officials in Private Conspiracy using Government Resources – human and technical – on the Quasi Private/Public Dime’ and suggest that objectively considered any court would find it asinine].

46 Am Jur 2d 176: “The mere fact that a judge had previously presided over a different case involving the same party is not, by itself, a sufficient basis for requiring disqualification.” The citations provided in 46 Am Jur 2d SS176 are probate and child custody; certainly nothing in assault or torture and [I] claim [my] circumstances overwhelm that precedent or rule.

This is as close as [my case] comes to what might be seen as the conventional 28 USCS 372 allegation in the District of Columbia Circuit [wife of Judge working for Senator, two Senators having lunch with remote Judge] - ‘big fish in a small pond as actionable legal theory’ - and the District of Columbia Circuit has already found the “old-boy network” is not actionable in MATTER 39 F.3d 374 at 382.

Hastings must be seen as a trap for the pro se litigant; two judges signed the Complaint but the opinion does not specify why – only that they did – and the committee of five judges made a beeline for the grand jury documentation. Is that a reasonable standard this Court would expect from [a pro se litigant]? If so, [I] would probably need all the accoutrements of an investigative mechanism complete with undercover sources and grainy video tapes alleging somebody conspired to bring the matter in to [the judge] – rigging the assignment at the clerk’s counter for instance. There certainly is an abundance of surveillance mechanisms – even private ones – in this town, but [my] case is so highly politicized [I] do not think [I] can meaningfully access any of them. With a circumstantial case centered around the neuroprosthetic technology, [I] should not need to.

WEBB, TESTER, LAMONT - holy cow, that's a lot of guys in on 'the fix' 2006.

Hastings IS the standard or the known example of judicial misconduct to which all other allegations are compared in the District of Columbia. Noting the jury DID NOT reach a guilty verdict, a judge was recorded and observed in a pattern of communication and movement [allegedly] soliciting a $150,000 bribe.
Matters allegations of judicial misconduct in the District of Columbia circa 1990s concern various Clinton efforts to attack and remove judges from assorted inquiries and lawsuits, all or at least most of which uniformly failed.

While they were doing that, however, Hastings himself – the recently exiled former judge – snuck around by the backdoor and got elected to the House of Representatives (D-Fl) where he now sits on the intelligence committee [Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence]. In fact, he is second in line to be chairman of the committee when the Democrats take control of the House, and Pelosi doesn’t like Jane Harman who conceptually is the ranking member or first in line. And columnist Ruth Marcus says the Congressional Black Caucus is solid behind naming Hastings chairman and won’t be swayed. Pelosi's Unintelligent Choice, Ruth Marcus, Washington Post, November 1 2006 page A21.

That is so extreme it - the election and committee assignment - must be a CIA orchestration [beyond the court case]. It is insulting to the democratic process and our institutions of government, and it diminishes Congress in front of the military command and our foreign allies. Actually, it diminishes us in front of our enemies as well, but our allies are the ones who really get cut.

And in walks Jim Webb as a CIA fix candidate designed to take down Senator Allen, who is solid in the state but trailing slightly in the northern suburbs where the CIA employees who are trying to pull this grand scam all live.
What swine.
This is unbelievable.

Virginia cannot vote for Webb. You can’t even use Hastings as a standard of judicial misconduct never mind making the guy head of the Select Committee on Intelligence – that case was too extreme. The Clintons raised trivial issues in their 372(c) allegations, but conducting the massive FBI operation behind Hastings is beyond the ability of private litigants to mount and it goes too far the other way.

These orchestrations are farcical. Disgraceful. Pathetic and wrong.

Please vote for Senator Allen.

Please vote for Senator Allen, and tell him not to let them do this stuff.

[William Barr who went on to be Attorney General of the United States under George H.W. Little Kid] received his bachelor's degree in government and a master's degree in government and Chinese studies, in 1971 and 1973 respectively, from Columbia University.

[Justice Ginsburg] was a Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law from 1963-1972, and Columbia Law School from 1972-1980, where she became the first tenured woman and co-authored the first law school case book to be written on sex discrimination. She was a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences in Stanford University, California from 1977-1978.

Looking at William Barr and Justice Ginsburg as having been Columbia and CIA, its worth questioning how ‘hard a line’ there is between CIA and Mossad both in theory and in reality when you have New York Jews deploying for Allard Lowenstein of the CIA so Israel can get a neuroprosthetic technology concurrent to the Columbia issue.
Lowenstein and Peter Bourne also tie to Stanford. Columbia itself may be ‘Uptown’ and not ‘Manhattan’ but it’s certainly New York and Dennis Sweeney is not known to have identified which neighborhood or borough a group of Jewish people attacking him were located in. That operation continued - worsening - at least into 1980, but Efraim Halevy ran the Mossad in the United States 1970 to 1974 which is when it all began, and their little schemes are becoming increasingly transparent.

Webb did not originate it, but he formalized it.

Indicators are the CIA is NOW trying to deny involvement in the attack on Allen so perhaps it was conceptually undertaken by Naval Intelligence or somebody else, but their denial isn’t good enough. Bush is high on pushing forward with the illicit mechanisms and the CIA lawyers already arranged and legitimized the arguments like ‘Public Officials in Private Conspiracy Using Government Technology on the Quasi-State Dime [of implicit eventual promotion or even just affiliation if not immediate monetary award in pay or overtime]’
and you can’t let the CIA deny that now.
TOO LATE.
It is a huge reform argument CIA LIBERALS like Hillary Clinton have no intention of addressing; meanwhile people – Amish school children – are being gunned down.

Webb should withdraw. Not over anything he wrote [though it's very possible the publishing ties to CIA activity]. At least he does write, and it isn't about raising a child in a village [by big name politicians who briefly focus and then walk on it] when the marriage rate is in a free fall. There is something to be said for having the husband go down to the corner tavern after the fight with the wife, as opposed to having the cops put him in family court where he uses the one phone call to contact a lawyer who also does divorce. Might not happen often but the scenario probably has a larger 'intimidation effect' over time - careful with a woman who might turn on you [first date question in New York - have you ever sent a man to 'family court'?].
Well if you're an Ivy League woman of the ruling elite of course family court would be the preference.
Webb should withdraw because the whole surveillance paradigm is sordid, certainly including the part he spawned which has proven explosive; it's very possibly a factor drawing the U.S. into doing worse than we should be doing or leading to 'reduced expectations in advance,' and our military has been corrupted by it. Not entirely his fault, it's difficult to see where his part begins and ends.

U.N. notes increase in Israeli roadblocks, by Karin Laub, Associated Press, Oct 11 2006. Jerusalem - Israel's network of military checkpoints and road barriers in the West Bank has grown by 40 percent this past year, part of an increasingly sophisticated system of controls that disrupts all aspects of Palestinian life, a U.N. agency said Wednesday.
These physical obstacles are carving up the West Bank into separate parts, with travel between them becoming more and more difficult, said David Shearer, head of the U.N.'s office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Jerusalem....

Allard Lowenstein was a liberal Jewish CIA guy who had significant ties to the Mossad and Israel. POINT BLANK the fire has burned across the bridge, and they've got us playing their game.

Twofold Operation Seals Sadr City, Troops Seek U.S. Soldier, Militiaman, John Ward Anderson and Ellen Knickmeyer, Washington Post, October 30, 2006.
BAGHDAD, Oct 29 - American military police backed by Iraqi troops maintained their cordon of Baghdad's Sadr City on Sunday, manning barricades and check points in and around the Shiite slum in an operation to find a [CONCEPTUALLY] kidnapped U.S. soldier and to capture [an Iraqi militia leader].
The soldier, an Iraqi American translator whose name has not been released, has been missing for six days. He was abducted [ ] while making an unauthorized visit to see relatives in the Karrada neighborhood of central Baghdad last Monday.
U.S. forces have effectively sealed off Sadr City and its 2.5 million residents from the rest of Baghdad, and within Sadr City, they have isolated the neighborhood around the home of [ ] Abu Deraa....

Hopefully that American soldier really did stray and was legitimately kidnapped, as opposed to this being some CIA manipulation game which ultimately traces to the Israelis or supporting American community [having grave doubts about their soldiers being conceptually kidnapped by CIA-Hezbollah effectively legitimizing the attacks on Lebanon. Tunneling is old now, they have technology to monitor it IN THE BAG WITHOUT DOUBT and after all the distances aren't great; the Lowenstein effort effectively showed the Israelis could implant their whole damn army and monitor the lot of them with a couple dish antennas. Circa 1975. They just want to settle the Golan Heights which isn't theirs; day of the 'poor Jewish people' passed with the attacks on Dennis Sweeney which EVERYBODY in the industry knows about but nobody is saying].

The President of Iran - who denies the Holocaust - is very probably implanted, making the whole thing a goof on the international system in the nurture whore / crisis whore paradigm, but it leads to a lot of horrible repression.

Supporting Democracy - Or Not, Anne Applebaum, Washington Post, October 31 2006 page A21. [On Hungary 1956] As late as June 1956 a clueless CIA (sound familiar?) published an internal document declaing that "there really is no underground movement" in Hungary at all....
Only after four days of street fighting did the American secretary of state, John Foster Dulles - a man who had spoken often of liberating the "captive nations" of Eastern Europe - finally declare that the U.S. government did not consider the Hungarians "potential allies." The message was clear: The West would not intervene.
Or almost clear: At the same time Dulles was reassuring everybody that nothing would be done, Radio Free Europe was explaining to its listeners how to make molotov cocktails and hinting at the American invasion to come. To use contemporary language, a part of the U.S. government was "promoting democracy." Another part was "advocating stability." The result was a bloody mess.
The Hungarians kept fighting even after Soviet tanks arrived, believing help was on the way. Hundreds died. And Western policy in the region suffered a setback from which it took nearly 40 years to recover.

Shave and a haircut: six bits.

Sorry. The Virgin Anne Applebaum, flaunting - and guarding - her own chastity and the public's ignorance in the Washington Post. Budapest 1956 was one of those unpleasant things which happen when the ruling elite - no more comfortable in the West than the East with real democracy - plays CIA games to enshrine a control concept.

The argument against letting the Israeli lobby drive us in Iraq is that the control concept is illusive and never was wholly conceptualized beyond the Israeli lobby wanting an ongoing American presence in the region [committed as a deployment]. It sounds funny; the Israeli lobby pushing us into a Middle East Korea but that is what they're looking for.
A white middle class American, that 'thought' simply would not have been written a year ago - but in Washington D.C. the gloves are off and everybody is talking real serious.

George W. Bush - and I guess Karl Rove, James A. Baker III, or whoever pulls the strings [Ed Meese always seemed like a lightweight but he might serve as messenger] - are trying to throw elections in Virginia and Montana never mind Budapest.

George Allen is better than the candidate they put up anyway, but he is also better than their whole little scheme. Please support him, and oppose the orchestration.

THE ENRON YOU DIDN’T UNDERSTAND

Early 1970s into the 1980s the Federal Reserve kept credit to farmers real easy. Then, once it had ‘em hooked, it jerked the line and reeled them in – effectively confiscating the equity the farmers had in their land. Willie Nelson doing Farm Aid and all that; somebody sent in Tim McVeigh to diminish the credibility of the resistance. Nick Leeson Barings Bank was a clique movement versus the Lloyd’s ‘recruit to dilute effort’ in which many minor investors were lured in to save the clique. Looks like Enron was a clique movement that switched to the Lloyd’s model at the end when Ken Lay walked around asking people to put their savings in.

Jeffrey Skilling didn’t see that? He deserves what they threw at him; the sentencing reads like something out of The Count of Monte Cristo. Skilling Gets 24 Years for Fraud at Enron, Former Workers Tell of Hard Times Over Lost Jobs, Retirement Savings, Carrie Johnson, Post, October 24 2006. ....Dawn Powers Martin, who worked at the company’s credit union for 22 years, called Skilling a “liar, a thief and a drunk” who “cheated me and my daughter out of our retirement” [is that not ‘my daughter and I’ ?]. When asked to make a statement, Skilling professed remorse but he spoke with the most passion when he vowed to appeal. “I am innocent of every one of these charges,” he told the court...... and the still loyal ship’s mate turned ‘Count of Monte Cristo’ goes over the wall with the treasure map to get some cash before settling with the bad ones who did him in. SORRY CHARLIE. Best v. Kelly, Taxpayers Watchdog Inc. [cases they’d cite in bouncing him if he tried to argue CIA orchestration]

..... Under federal rules, Skilling, 52, must serve at least 85 percent of his sentence, which means he will not be released for more than two decades, when he will be in his 70s..... Skilling’s sentence is second only to the 25-year term given to WorldCom Inc. founder Bernard J. Ebbers [but different insofar as Ebbers was probably in on the fix AND crash, given the conspicuous consumption in million dollar parties and shower curtains etc etc]. ......Skilling’s term is by far the longest of any won by the Justice Department’s Enron Task Force, which announced late Monday that it was closing it’s doors [which is preclusionary – once they’re done, nobody will ever look for the money Fastow stashed offshore in the CIA vaults]. Former finance chief Andrew S. Fastow, who admitted siphoning millions of dollars from the energy-trading company but ultimately cut a deal with prosecutors and testified against Skilling, got a six year sentence..... [reduced from ten which surprised a lot of people].

It would have looked better filmed in black and white. Swashbuckling, once Skilling gets out and sets after his tormentors – his lawyers got roughly $30 million dollars with $15 more million coming; can you imagine how pissed he would be if he ultimately found they were in it with the CIA? Too bad the CIA also owns Hollywood.There’s something about galloping a horse down a moonlit dirt track while wearing a billowing cape that is strangely compelling when filmed from slightly behind and above.

Lea [Weingarten] Fastow was the only wife to get tagged, and that is a possible indicator: Al and Jenny Lowenstein, Peter Bourne and Mary King - at high levels, CIA travels in pairs. Won’t be released till he’s in his seventies, while Fastows get CIA summer camp, executive pensions, and dancing till dawn on the Caribbean tourist ships. Bad call Jeff.

What they’re saying at Wikipedia, CIA on the web. ‘Early career. While at Continental Illinois [National Bank and Trust Company], Fastow helped pioneer a system of raising capital by selling notes backed by risky loans. The practice spread across the industry “because it provides an obvious advantage for a bank,” noted the Chicago Tribune. “It moves assets off the bank’s balance sheet while creating revenue.” Continental became the largest U.S. bank to fail during the Savings and Loan crisis.’

Proof is in the pudding – Wikipedia says Skilling hired Fastow. True/False – Skilling knows damn well whether Fastow was a plant, and that is presumably why the executives never looked at all of Fastow’s off shore money accounts that went back across the years. The famous Skilling ‘***hole’ remark in a telephone call with business analysts – Skilling was expecting the CIA or whoever to cover that [interestingly enough, perhaps suggesting a parallel structure. Are we finding out that really there were two Enron[s]].

Fastow graduated from Tufts University in 1983 with degrees in economics and Chinese [William Barr Chinese]. While there, he met his future wife, Lea Weingarten....

Senate passed Oxley-Sarbanes 99 to 0. Efraim Halevy doesn’t discuss Mossad funding structures being operationally unified with surveillance capabilities. Hillary Clinton sat on the board of Wal-Mart as they were planning their attack strategy or what can be characterized as the ‘Chinese collaboration’ as opposed to significantly splitting China/Brazil for example.

Skilling got a lot of prison time even though he knew about it and HE THOUGHT he was on their side and it was national interest and the whole bit; it even looks like the CIA maneuvered the short selling of Enron shares to maximize their assets. How many companies in Virginia are used to park guys or stash material for the CIA - “Thursday night through March I need fifteen hundred square feet of warehouse space and a desk: can you help me out on this thing?"
Don’t be naïve in it.

Once burned twice shy. Previously he’d have lined people up for them. What’s his attitude now? Is Senator Allen seen as ‘resistance,’ with Webb seen as a collaborator? All we know is that they’re going after Allen and pushing Webb forward. Do they plan on then asking Webb to use his ties to help them, the way they asked – before they trashed and burned – Allen?

It is time for reform – it is passed time, and were it anybody else but Webb somebody could try to argue that, but here we are and Webb is significantly associated with it – the domestic surveillance mechanism and the MOUNTAIN of corruption going back to the early 1980s.

We all wish the world was different, but in the here-and-now Allen is definitely the man to vote for.

Bitter humor – in Montana Jon Tester opposes the Patriot Act or says he does [though he won’t do anything to challenge the CIA on it], while in Virginia Jim Webb embodies the worst aspects of the Patriot Act.

Vote for Senator Allen.

Editorial: Bush - Swine.

You thought you understood that Bush is swine, but this is an entirely new 'swine Bush' paradigm. Documented. The other Bush. Fl[orda] Lawmaker Faces Racial-Slur Inquiry, Peter Whoriskey, Washington Post, Oct. 27 2006. MIAMI - For months, state Rep. Rafael Arza has ducked accusations that he repeatedly used a racial slur. But last Saturday night, according to authorities, he was caught using a derogatory term for a black person on another legislator's voice mail....
In a rare move House Democrats vowed this week to walk out unless the prominent Republican legislator resigns or is expelled....
[T]he scandal represents a dramatic turn for a legislator who was a key ally in Gov. Jeb Bush's education reform drive.... Several top Republicans distanced themselves from Arza this week.
"Opening up wounds like that just doesn't make sense - it's tragic and its sad," [Jeb] Bush said. While praising Arza as a "great partner in education reform," [Jeb] Bush said "he's got problems. He's got to work on his problems.... Now I think it's time for him to focus on his own personal issues."
[The other representative] said he did not know why Arza used the racial language again on a recorder.
[ ] "It sounded like arrogance.... He's a bully, and somebody had to stand up to him."

Washington Post 2004 ran a photo of President Bush's daughter sitting in the back seat of a sedan, and turning her head over her right shoulder and sticking her tongue out at reporters in a chase car [visible through the rear window of the sedan]. Falling into a broad category of orchestrated swine-like behavior, that would be appropriate for display on a website which tracks such behavior. Ultimately hit the search engines trying to find an electronic copy - and couldn't. What is widely available on the web is a photo of the other daughter sitting in the back seat of a sedan, and turning her face to the left and sticking her tongue out at reporters standing near the car [visible through the back window on the driver's side of the sedan].

This one you get. The other one - the other daughter in the other photo - is apparently secret.
....The former first lady recalled receiving a letter from someone she knows saying she should tell Jenna Bush how outrageous it was for her to have stuck out her tongue at photographers while traveling with her father on a campaign trip, an act caught on film.
"I wrote the girl back and I said, if you'll pardon me, 98 percent of Americans would like to stick their tongue out at the press," Barbara Bush told ABC, adding that the gesture took place while the press corps was kidding around. "It was so nothing, and it was funny."

Family of swine in their pathetic orchestrations; media of swine who ignore the blatant for the CIA orchestrated.

This website supports George Allen and opposes Jim Webb; we oppose the attack on seated delegates in Congress [Allen and Conrad Burns], and we oppose any cheating at the polls or in the media designed to influence the outcome at the voting booth [where to begin: Cunningham and Ney seem to have been legitimate, while Foley, Weldon, and 'the guy sued for allegedly strangling his girlfriend though not sufficiently to merit criminal prosecution' all seem if not entirely feigned than significantly manipulated. We worry DeLay will be heard from again in one way or another].

From conradburned.blogspot.com: It's easy to rationalize [such] seemingly minor orchestration. By way of comparison, we never met Jeffrey Skilling and probably wouldn't like him if we did; nonetheless its increasingly clear that Enron was a CIA funding mechanism similar to Abramoff and Oxley-Sarbanes entirely contrived to advance government regulation rather than management accountability to the share holder. It is NOT easy, however, to see where even the minor orchestration ends.
Quite frankly, Allen was caught with his pants down: Sarbanes-Oxley passed the Senate 99-0. The CIA put one over on him. The catch is that Allen is willing to revisit the issue, and Webb can't. That's part of the deal the Democrats and Webb cut with Bush. It's preclusionary - you elect a Democrat and you let them walk away.

Jeb Bush, has been caught red-handed in the crisis whore / nurture whore paradigm, with a blatant appeal to victimization; he manufactured bullying for Democrats to resist which, needless to say, does not speak well for the Democrats, and ultimately may further neuter them as a national party - they might be well served to walk on by.

[Mark R.] Warner Won't Make 2008 Run For President; Ex-Governor Cites [the Obama Candidacy], Michael D. Shear, Washington Post, October 13 2006 page A1, AFTER the CIA took down Jack Ryan in Chicago for Barak Obama 2004. Liberals stepping over the two dead bodies of better men, AND the CIA gun control advocacy has been officially revealed at almost the same time: "Edward O. Wells, 85, a former CIA officer who later became the first executive director of the anti-handgun organization now known as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, died Oct. 11 of brain cancer at his home in Washington".... "He was a pioneer who helped grow the organization," said Sahrah Brady, who took a leading role in the group after her husband, James S. Brady, was wounded in the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan. "He was a permanent fixture. He was totally committed to preventing handgun violence" [Matt Schudel, Post, October 20 2006 page B7].
Most compelling suggestion we've seen to the effect shooting James Brady may have been a premeditated aspect of the decision made by John R. Simpson and Stuart Knight to have Jerry Parr shoot Reagan in the car,
but anyway its official: at a macro level the people of Virginia have now been screwed every which way by the hometown CIA based in Langley, even though this may be operationally handled by the domestic branch recently moved to Colorado or New York Jews on Wall Street. Warner is down, Allen is attacked, Webb - the candidate-imposter who participated in the activity but evaded indictment in Iran Contra - has a ready forum from which to spread their disinformation and lies [to say nothing of Webb's work in creation of the domestic surveillance mechanisms], a liberal gun control advocate is being pushed forward for the presidency [they're very obviously photographed together], and your vote in Virginia 2006 will be saving yourself or alternately slicing your own throat in 2008.

Is it possible to separate Hillary Clinton from all this? Is she looking for the vice presidential ride on the Democratic side, and can we expect her to withdraw her official presidential candidacy in the immediate future as Warner did?
In a like vein, is this ironclad proof the CIA intends to undertake voter fraud in Virginia, or merely a preponderance of evidence that their tracks are leading in that direction. Time, Joe Klein, Why Barack Obama Could Be The Next President, October 23 2006.

Knowing Bush has thrown in with the Democrats in attacking Allen and trying to turn over control of the legislative branch, of course its fun to reverse engineer their illicit deal. Most important is that it keeps Bush out of jail. Quotes in The Washington Post 10/23 suggest George H.W. Little Kid was actually behind the whole thing [with James A. Baker III and Karl Rove doubtlessly close in back of him], trying to use the new Democratic majority in the House to protect him and attack his [Republican] enemies.
What does Bush et al want the Democrats to do for them?
'No Child Left Behind' is here to stay - registering your children for the feds turns out to be the Bush legacy. President Obama can't drop it.
'Bush racketeering deals' with the Mexicans, HUGELY opening the door to illegal immigration and setting them up for FANNIE MAE mortgages, are legitimized. They're not getting sent back now.

HUBBLE SAVED. Already a modest success, no thanks to Bush. Our thanks to everybody who assisted on that. Helpless George Little Kid was going to let it fall out of orbit and roast. Nothing he could do - when maybe it turns out the Space Shuttle problems were Apollo-13 legacy orchestration [the movie with their boy Tom Hanks was suspicious], and the 'scheduling crisis' with the old Soviets at the space station was straight out of the nurture whore / crisis whore paradigm.

Putin in the Union. Pointlessly oppressive with a fine almost Texas-like 'stupid act,' feigning ignorance of the non-profit and charity 'registration' problems. That's the only union George Bush will talk about, but repression generally is the issue. Stricter Policy Splits West Bank Families; Americans Who Live There Denied Visas, Scott Wilson, Post October 23 2006. Its partitioning the West Bank like they want to divide Iraq - all you hear about is the violence, but the story notes there are 70,000 foreign nationals waiting for papers to live and work in the West Bank ['Sam Bahour, business consultant born in Youngstown Ohio.... developed a $10 million dollar mall' there and got 'an MBA through a joint program run by Tel Aviv University and Northwestern' paraphrased] and 120,000 families seeking unification with 4,000 permits granted annually.

How can you tell your children you endorsed that agenda?
[I] oppose Michael Steele in Maryland as an obvious Bush/Rove tool, and support Benjamin Cardin as an independent or at least non-Bush tied. The voters in Maryland may vote Steele in, but if he gets the seat it hopefully will be by votes and not fraud [Md. Voting Machines Had Defect, Cameron W. Barr, Post October 26 2006 page B1 continued B6 as Key Part Was Replaced in Many Voting Machines with photo of a "Diebold official Tom Feehan" looking perhaps deliberately hapless].

What's funny is that in cutting the deals and throwing control, Bush is admitting he is ideologically spent. All she wrote. They handed him a CIA script and he implimented it. When he came to the last page - that was it; he didn't have any more he could do with a Republican majority.

Can Boy George and the old man be broken? Absolutely. YES on the CIA capital punishment advocacy. Name one thing he did as director of Central Intelligence - Geo. H.W. Little Kid broke the moratorium in Furman v. Georgia using Gary Gilmore in Utah [July 1976 to three days before he left office in January 1977], with George W. Little Kid extending death into Connecticut, Vermont, and the Dakotas with the CIA. Their 'Capital Punishment Advocacy' with nomenclature or an overview designator, and the 'CIA lethal injection death process' as a subheading. We used to be a diverse nation with the gas chamber, electric chair, hanging, and firing squad. It was actually a mechanism they used to corrupt state legislatures. Seat belt laws - George W. Little Kid only continued what the Clintons started, and that's without getting into Clover Leaf. Kidnaping, rape and death of Dru Sjodin? Be sure and also thank their collaborator candidates for that.

Jon Tester in Montana and Webb in Virginia are Bush choices for crying out loud [YES - at some level they were negotiated settlements]; Webb is associated with the warrantless domestic surveillance mechanisms, supported by the CIA, and the media press against Allen continues. An Ascent Shadowed By Questions on Race, Bill Turque, Washington Post October 26 2006 page A1. ....'murky 30-year-old anecdotes'.... JESUS WEPT. Illinois had capital punishment and a convict on death row escaped. "Terrible Tommy" O'Connor from 1921 was sentenced to hang. The state held on to the noose and scaffold for decades until 1977 when it dawned on somebody that if they ever did catch the guy they wouldn't hang him. A group of prosecutors, one of whom worked on the John Wayne Gacy case [also late 1970s], were photographed with the 'hanging regalia' including gallows and noose, now up for sale in Illinois. Infamous Piece of Chicago History Goes on the Block, Kari Lydersen, Washington Post, Oct. 31 2006. Is this suddenly controversial? Allen had a Confederate flag, which were also displayed on the Dukes of Hazard television show [wasn't there one on the car?] in about the same time period.
George Allen is a fine United States Senator,
he has been attacked by George Bush, Karl Rove et al,
and the CIA has instigated media manipulation targeting his campaign.
Please support Allen and oppose Webb.
If anyone has a chance to talk to old Chicago prosecutors, ask if there was ever talk about John Wayne Gacy being a CIA orchestration with a ground support element slightly pre-Webb ["In addition to his clown act, he became a committee member for the Democratic Party. In this capacity, he was even able to meet and be photographed with future-First Lady Rosalynn Carter." Wikipedia on Gacy, but that would be real typical CIA]. Was there anything in Gacy's legal representation that might have been characteristic.

2006 started with two potential - viable - 2008 presidential candidates from the State of Virgina; like the famous New York 'subway series,' a contest between Warner and Allen would have commanded national attention.
All right - Warner renounced his bid, but what about Colin Powell? Hopefully Powell doesn't intend to just be a walk on after waiting in the wings [for years], and hopefully Powell isn't going to get sucked into the Bush muck mechanism which is pretty tricky for a self starter to avoid [watching McCain kiss up to Bush backers while trying to stay clear of Bush]. Supporting Allen now [hopefully with public appearances but at least a fundraiser] would have BIG payout down the road for trivial effort, particularly if Powell OPPOSED privatizing social security for instance. Big tent, and you're already beating back the flames of muck. Powell could take the publicity his own way, AND he would be shaking hands at the convention like a vet.

Hopefully Powell is not naive in the effort required to stay clear of the Bush muck mechanism.

ANOTHER FASCINATING DECISION by the CIA. Bush should be forced out - NOW, but on October 19th 'several hundred' people picketed an event with Allen and Bush in Richmond, and effectively prevented Allen from defending himself. The people chanted "Allen is a racist" which, versus Webb, isn't particularly significant but assumes a whole new tone in light of the Obama candidacy. The Audacity of Hope[?] - yeah, its audacity all right when the CIA is behind you.

Senator Obama is definitely NOT pro-gun ownership. He DOES NOT favor carry rights, presumably including the one in Virginia which says that if you're a citizen and don't have any felony convictions you can strap it on and openly walk with it [in fact you must openly walk with it - concealed requires the license].

Senator Clinton, Handsome Obama, the other Democratic candidates of 2008 - if there are any - do they realize how far Webb went down the surveillance trail in establishment of the HOME GUARD Security? Well they must - sure it's extreme, but why else do they think George Bush pushed him forward. Is the photo a 'smoking gun' direct link to the ex-director of Central Intelligence in the years after he had President Reagan shot? Not if Obama only has the political acumen of an elementary school kid - other than that, its fairly circumstantial. Does Obama know Webb is a 'fixed' candidate? YES.
Jack Ryan knocked down for Obama 2004, Giuliani knocked out [supposedly with 'cancer' induced or not] for Clinton in 2000 and now Jeanine Pirro and the guy who gets absolutely no party support in 2006 - do Democrats absolutely have to get the CIA to cheat on their behalf for credibility in campaign? Or is that just when they want to win?

Marine Corps taking the hit in Beirut 1983; a precursor to Iran-Contra and CIA Jim Webb who is currently dominating the CIA-New World Order mouth piece Washington Post. APOLOGY. This was slated to be 'lead photograph' going into the election of 2006, and it is probably still the most important photograph - the critical reason you should vote for George Allen and oppose Webb - but known, now-quantifiable, 'defined CIA gaming in the politics of 2008' is the most immediate problem which needs to be brought to the attention of the American public and the people of Virginia. An additional reason to vote for George Allen and opposed the Webb.

George W. Bush teaming with Hillary Clinton to throw the races:
Pressing Senate Bid With Sharp Tongue and Strong Resolve, Marc Santora, New York Times October 20 2006 page A20.
It would be hard to imagine a race with two such strikingly different candidates. Mrs. Clinton has a comfortable suburban upbringing, counted the nation's elite as her peers at Wellesley College and Yale Law School and became the first woman to be made full partner at the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas [ed. - without going into the allegation about laundering drug money through state bond issues].
Mr. Spencer, 59, was an orphan and a community college dropout who enlisted in the Army [in 1966, and by 1968, he was in Vietnam, where he led a combat platoon south of Danang... He is reluctant to talk about his time in battle. But he has no regrets about going. "We were on a mission to help the South Vietnamese people," he said. Mr. Spencer was awarded the Bronze Star for his service.
George Kline, 58, [ ] served under Mr. Spencer's command. "He was never a dictator type," Mr. Kline said. "But he spoke his mind. And he also had a nice dose of healthy sarcasm"].
He [Mr. Spencer] battled and overcame alcoholism, worked in construction, built his own cleaning business and became mayor of Yonkers, New York's fourth-largest city. He governed as a tax cutting, law-and-order conservative....
Yet he is also deeply frustrated by the lack of support he has received from the national Republican Party, despite its deep antipathy toward Mrs. Clinton. He also has received little help from either Gov. George E. Pataki or former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, whom Mr. Spencer has criticized as too liberal.
In a recent interview with the syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, Mr. Spencer said the lack of support made him feel like he had been "stabbed in the back."

George Allen and Conrad Burns certainly aren't the only ones betrayed, but put the three of them [those two plus Mr. Spencer] right at the head of the line.

October 19 2006 George W. Little Kid went down to Richmond and diminished Allen with essentially patronizing talk about 'staying the course in Iraq' when everybody knows we're about to change direction in that troubled region [forcing Allen to distance himself from those remarks];
Clinton in McLean on the same day supporting the CIA nominee at least with words which didn't have to be qualified afterwards. Swine.

How can that happen? Easy, when pirates have taken over the ship and the big players in the parties are all cowardly lions.
They should have take George W. Little Kid out to the woodshed. A blogspot supporting Donald Rumsfeld [http://thelostbenningboys.blogspot.com] can be accessed via the menu to the right of this text field, and will soon be updated with startling new developments. Why is Bush scared of Allen in Virginia but supporting Santorum in Pennsylvania; the religious context - or even racketeering - supporting the decision process will be discussed.
END OF THE DAY it is revisiting an issue poorly handled for decades,
previously poorly handled by the Clinton Administration,
now poorly handled by [the] Little Kid,
and an even more compelling reason to oppose the CIA racketeering
and support George Allen.

Status 10/19/06: Post of 10/18/06 was definitely an enabling device for legitimizing cheating at the polls.
Post's Web Operation Picks Spayd As Editor, Martin Weil, Washington Post 10/19/2006 page A12 identifies Liz Spayd as "in charge of The Post's national news coverage since 2000," an obvious position from which to further the CIA 'New World Order' agenda of course without speculating about her possible - or even probable - CIA affiliation.
'Ms. Spayd CIA' characteristics were examined on the condition of anonymity 1. pending completion of the report, 2. for fear of possible retaliation, 3. because [whoever it was] didn't have any balls and its easier to backstab if people don't know your name, 4. [insert your own favorite reason for The Post's refusing to attribute a comment or perspective], according to sources familiar with the investigation.

Women’s Vote Could Tip Close Contest; Webb and Allen Temper Records, Soften Images, Lisa Rein, Washington Post, October 23 2006 page A1. Do women in Virginia understand the CIA has a plan to reduce monthly ovulation to perhaps three times a year?
Word on the streets in Washington D.C. is that they’re working in that direction, perhaps intending to influence reproduction in regions they perceive to be over-populated. It may be at least superficially well intended, but that is the CIA plan.
And faced with that, understanding it ain’t gonna be entirely voluntary but accompanied by at least coercion if not outright force or decree [it might be accomplished by simply radiating the population or putting chemicals in the water without notice], women would remotely consider voting for CIA candidate James Webb on women’s issues? Of course the Washington Post, quasi-official mouthpiece of the Central Intelligence Agency, isn’t going to say anything about it. Leading to this theater of the absurd – an entire candidacy of the most flagrant misinformation. One regret is that the liberals will probably never stop to consider what they are actually doing; one consolation is that there aren’t that many extreme liberals even in the northern part of the state.

When is somebody from the CIA going to get sick of all this orchestration and just start putting handouts under the windshield wipers of cars in the supermarket parking lots or trying to talk to commuters at the West Falls Church Metro Station?

BUSH MUST BE MADE TO APOLOGIZE. He has undertaken an attack upon the legislative branch of government that is unconstitutional and he MUST apologize for that,
including BOTH the Macaca-scam attack on Senator Allen and the Abramoff attack on Senator Burns.
He should apologize for the whole thing - the whole shabby story including Jeanine Pirro in New York blocking tacklers for Hillary Clinton [the intent to shift control of the Congress] which would reveal Bush as an imposter in his sheep's clothing,
but at the very least he MUST be made to explicitly apologize for the focused attacks on Allen and Burns. Not MENTION but actually apologize clearly and fully.
A guess is that he will acknowledge 'Macaca - the word orchestration,' claiming it was intended to drive on illegal immigration and got out of control. Bush's ability to pick the word was a heck of a lot more immediate than Senator Allen's ability to pick the guy; Bush put him up to it and Bush can fall on it. He will probably try to duck on the media manipulation aspect of the attack on Allen though.
Abramoff was a domestic deployment of the CIA over funding mechanisms in the Indian community which is why Burns thought he was suppose to go along with it. YEAH - Bush will look really bad on that but the UNITED STATES SENATE better unify and make him do it.

Last chance for the donor base to pin Bush, and make him promise to play a straight game. Hastert should step down NOW, and no cheating either way at the polls. Not for Santorum in Pennsylvania or for Webb in Virginia or for Tester in Montana or for Steele in Maryland. Not against Corzine in New Jersey. Play an absolute straight game. And Burns could use fifty thousand dollars in advertising from the RNC in Montana because they've put him through so damn much.

It is also HUGELY IMPORTANT you make it VERY clear to Bush that your support for Senator Allen in 2006 in NO WAY translates into support for Jeb in 2008.

'FORCE BUSH OUT' - newsletter available weekday mornings in front of Union Station in Washington D.C.

At the behest of the Bush Administration - at the behest of Bush anyway, in adjudicated conspiracy with full deniability -
James A. Baker III will opt for a severe and restricted government in Baghdad following the conceptual election in the
United States [we go on to blast the CIA for gaming in several of the Senate races 2006]. Having instigated the violence with the demolition of the shrine in Samarra at the beginning of the year, they now intend to end it in December with repression. Do not let this anti-democratic CIA manipulation triumph in Virginia. Carry signs, paste bumper stickers, tell your friends. 'He who hesitates is lost' - if we hesitate we are lost together. Hopefully it's not too late.

Cutting to the chase - Jim Webb represents a CIA attack on
George Allen. Point blank he does; perhaps he rationalizes it any number of ways but he does. How BAD or negative is the CIA activity - what is the full extent of it?
EMERGENT. We're just figuring this out.
Originally keyed on a kid - now a young man at Virginia Tech - having been sexually abused a child, and the assailant transitioning the attack into the college environment. They're very good at what they do; one witness spent roughly 173 days in a Maryland jail for trying to instigate an investigation [held on a prosecutor's allegation of something like 'perjury,' they would have been released at 180 days without a formal charge or trial]. Originated at a German school and both the kid [now a young man] and the assailant speak German.
Donald Fedge, a really smart and good natured high school kid crippled in a car wreck, now - 'damaged but cheerful' - going around to lecture groups [I think typically kids or young people] on auto safety. McLean Virginia. Studied German.
Keegan Zacharie, by all accounts a very smart high school kid on the brink of graduation gets somehow hustled into hunting for a weapon and ends up attacking - and badly slashing - policemen in Alexandria Virginia; top school and, you guessed our interest, studied German.

'What!?! Oh that's bull**** - the CIA is 'grooming' - gaming, attacking, assaulting - kids who study German in Virginia, or transitioning it in from other states, or starting it there and taking it elsewhere.'
Sorry. Street 'validation' or indicators [I am] very comfortable with....

Merely "...very comfortable" was 5:00 Friday; by midnight it was "OFF THE CHARTS CERTAIN" and by their standards that identifies the source but what are they going to do, kill the whole German Army like they went after the French 'government workers on vacation' with the plane crash [in South America]?
In 2001 Senator Allen tried to deploy the entirety of Virginia law enforcement over this - stripped command at least south to Richmond [true - you didn't know they had 'four star' policemen in Virginia but they do and the guy was not alone. In fact the room was crowded] - but Bush shut him down on it. Now we're talking NATO field maneuvers. They are pleasant in public but like each other? Don't believe it.

.....If [I] had the name of the kid being sexually assaulted, would it be posted here? In a word, yes. Somehow the CIA has a mechanism in a highly defined community, and it should be possible to 'reverse engineer' the activities - the assaults and attacks - to find the instigators or the designation mechanism that selects the young men who have been targeted.

An additional problem is that were he to be elected,
Jim Webb would not be the only Senator with significant ties to the CIA in the United States Senate.
Actually beyond 'ties' per se, Senator Clinton probably came up as a CIA executive dating back to her days in Arkansas, and now [continuing] runs an entirely private surveillance structure of her own. 'Public Official in Private Conspiracy using Government Technologies on the Quasi-State Dime; be sure and ask her about it if you ever rub elbows at a Bloomberg fundraiser apart from politics for instance. Bilyeu v. Clinton et. al 1:00-cv-02290 RWR which became Bilyeu v. Federal Government 1:01-cv-00321 RWR [DDC con't Dist of Columbia Court of Appeals] would be a reference.
Representing the alternate end of the spectrum or kind of a minimal involvement, Senator Obama let the CIA take down Jack Ryan in Chicago to seat him whether or not he himself was involved in the effort beyond taking direction for media responses.
Of the Republicans, McCain looks fixed from the Vietnam War which is hardly a mark of integrity but is better than the short term knee jerk opportunism - and treachery - on the other side.
The question is whether the Democrats are particularly driven to it insofar as they are a perpetual minority party going back to Wilson and the First World War.
Not a pretty picture but that may be where Howard Dean should start.

They have to keep Webb and Jon Tester out.

Again, awareness is emergent, and of course everybody should be watchful in looking for other CIA-precursor activities. The ounce of prevention is definitely worth the pound of cure. Oppose it, every way you can.

We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that strains with me
Shall be my brother:
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That drove for us upon Saint Crispin's day.

Before Agincourt, October 25 1415. There is still time for you to contact the Allen campaign in opposition to CIA activity in Virginia.

Bush keeping Santorum in Pennsylvania because Santorum just gave half the CIA cover on K Street to support the expanded government of the 'New World Order': will President-elect [Senator] Clinton, pretty evidently collaborating in the Bush effort, offer Casey a cabinet position as the 'consolation prize' down the road?

More.

Frist can't get the **** out of there soon enough.

Writing at http://conradburned.blogspot.com [menu to right]:

Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte (R-Va.)may not be "affiliated with" the CIA attack on George Allen in Virginia but he's certainly proximate to it and he was writing the legislation right around the time the CIA-orchestrated controversy down there blew up. It [the CIA-racketeering] isn't just Burns or limited to particular issues; they just want the guys 'who won't go their way' OUT and out now.
FASCINATING INSIGHT: In both these cases - Burns and Allen - the Senators typically don't just roll over for them but this time did 'what they thought the CIA wanted' because it seemed relatively trivial and compared to what the CIA usually does they figured nobody was going to get hurt. 'Macaca' - Allen did say that but only because he figured that him taking a few punches was better than the CIA causing a child to die of exposure in a border crossing which they have been known to do. Now its 'CIA-high school' - they're like a bunch of little kids trying to combine and attack the adults. Petulant.

Keep your eye on the ball – it ain’t the ‘party affiliation’ which is important or a mark of integrity one way or the other. Its the man. Please continue to ALSO support Conrad Burns in Montana who is definitely taking heavy punches in this same attack.

Latest development - Bush is hustling down to Richmond trying to deny following:

Does Jim Webb have the George Bush corrupted CIA endorsement, and if so - why?
He no doubt does have the endorsement - hardly a trick to 'reverse engineer' [read on].
The 'WHY' is emergent but becoming clear.
The bombing of Marine Barracks Beirut was 23 Oct 83,
and CIA station chief William Buckley was kidnapped 16 March 84 and tortured to death by Hezbollah over the following [fourteen] months. Which set up Iran Contra as a Bush effort to frame Reagan. Adler Berriman Seal - Barry Seal, CIA drug hauler bringing drugs into the United States under the SEA SPRAY designator - was killed in early 1986 which is kind of a marker, but the activity of Richard Secord 'reportedly' flying cocaine around the United States backs into the domestic surveillance mechanism Webb represented as Assistant Secretary of Defense. Among friends Webb probably doesn't even try to deny the latter point; we think he will try to duck on the Marine Barracks and Buckley.
Problem - Bush's whole focus is to 'enable' Hezbollah, currently gaining ground in definitely Lebanon and Iran if not Iraq which isn't as clear because the situation on the ground is more factionalized. There's long been talk that Hamas is a Mossad creation, and its equally possible Hezbollah is really a CIA creation from the Richard Helms years in Tehran. Of course they would love Webb and you should not be blind to the argument - to avert the terrorism you need to befriend the terrorist and migrate them into non-violence and he already has the connection blah blah blah, but Webb - at least through his UNDENIABLE affiliation with Bush - is so much worse than that. Why would you put a Hezbollah-linked CIA warrantless covert domestic surveillance specialist - actually an executive in it well beyond just the 'specialist' - into the United States Senate?
Swine. Or anyway a man caught in a very bad circumstance; of course he doesn't mention that activity. The question is whether or not he denies it when people ask him about it. 'HOME GUARD Security' is rumored to be the designator.

Hopefully this is damaging whatever plan there is for Jeb in 2008, but understand they are BRAZEN and will try to leverage any win in 2006. At issue is Bush diminishing the conservative wing of the party - on purpose and as a way of fueling his schemes in the 'New World Order' paradigm - and using it for his own advantage.

Our awareness of CIA activity in domestic politics exploding from the obvious cases in Virginia and Montana, we have to ask where it ends - what is the extent of it?

Sure he threw Conrad Burns to the dogs in Abramoff [actually worse - Bush selected Burns and targeted him and then set up for the Indians to close the door in his face; screw 'election,' Burns ought to slam the lot of them so hard the whole little scheme 'ends up in last week' for doing that], the real question now is whether Bush has arranged for voter fraud at the polls as a follow up measure.
Marc Racicot is a pro, but on the other hand Montana is still a small place.
No such doubts on cheating in Virginia [giving it away], Ohio [to keep], Maryland and probably New Jersey [to win]- the question is 'where.' Urban or rural, wealthy or more either side of middle class. Of course the guess is they already have wealthy and will cheat urban and middle class.
Similarly, to make sure control of the Senate does shift - and 'word on the streets' in Washington D.C. is that it will - we see the Republican party cheating for Cantwell in Washington State, and for Democratic candidates in Tennessee and Missouri.

The numbers still don't work though. Rhode Island, but its possible there is a Republican out there in a so-called 'safe seat' which isn't really safe.
Without Bush cheating for the Democrats, is it possible the Republicans would keep all their seats or only suffer a narrow loss IN SPITE of all the stunts they've done? Doesn't impress you, does it. The American people can, in a certain light, look suspiciously like sheep.

Question. What about Minnesota. Bush wants to claim it as an argument for his 'moderate' [moderately socialist] policies.

Humphrey, Mondale, and - Ventura -. Jesse kind of disgraced third party politics though, suggesting the 'big boys' [with the big money] are happy the way things are today. Cargill only has to cut two checks, and doesn't want to open itself up to supporting more overhead. Particularly now after DeLay [Texas] and Santorum from Pennsylvania DOUBLED the number of lobbyists under the conceptually Republican Administration. Bush likes to stay tight to the agencies, and that may mean he needs to keep Santorum who just gave half of them cover on K Street - watch for cheating at the polls in Pennsylvania NOT because Bush opposes Casey but because 'that's just the way it is.'

Attacking Allen but keeping Santorum?! And thinking of themselves as good conservatives? That's outrageous.

'Manner in which returns were reported 2004' and talk about Santorum 'being a strong finisher' may be precursor CIA involvement in the Pennsylvania race.
Questions: 1.can Christian fundamentalists work as poll watchers, and 2.if God tells you to add or subtract ballots a Muslim would do it and not call it cheating, right? Suppose you 'had a dream' the night before, or 'heard voices' [no, really][whether or not it's induced neuro-stimulus].
Slaughter of Amish kids in a one room school house as another precursor event to CIA activity in Pennsylvania - you have to call somebody you know on Capital Hill and ask them if they've heard anything. Swine.
Is DeLay still on the ballot in Sugar Land Texas? Don't be surprised to see him again.

Anyhow, Ventura in Minnesota started strong in refunding a budget surplus, and he was otherwise a pretty moderate guy - being 'conservative' should not equate to being draconian. How many young black men do you want in prison [selling drugs is bad, and 'possessing with intent to sell' is bad, but we can't get worked up over simple possession]. On the other hand, liberals - certainly like Humphrey - also enslave. Ventura briefly showed what a populist party might have been.

Footnote - 'word on the street' in Washington D.C. says Bush flew A-10 [low altitude attack planes] in Vietnam possibly after the American involvement had conceptually ended, and Jesse Ventura was a Navy SEAL at the time. It technically is possible they might have known each other or 'known of' each other from the service.

We are conservative, but not necessarily 'pro-Republican.' George H.W. Bush was chairman of the RNC as the CIA knocked out Nixon, and then went on to run the Agency after serving in China and being implanted with a neuroprosthetic - his being able to assert situational dominance over a lot of hacks is not a reason to fall in step with 'The Party.'
Quite the opposite, given the attacks on George Allen which show Bush to be - worse than a liar, traitor, or smack gutter hoe - very, very ideologically weak.

What the heck is really going on in Virginia.

Why President Bush is attacking Senator Allen,
the mechanics of the attack,
and important points for the players involved.

First important point: 'polling' is very important because it establishes a basis for 'cheating votes' on election day and beyond the media campaign may lead to real malfeasance at the critical point in time which is really what Allen is worried about. We also think there is an enemy in the Allen camp [at least one], but Allen should be able to define that - or go to Bush and ask flat out who it is - and handle that aspect of the situation.

Second important point: the betrayal is part of a larger political swap process which guarantees Senator Clinton re-election in New York and takes Allen out of the 2008 presidential race, conceptually advancing Senator McCain.
In that sense, it is necessary to understand Bush is not - and never was - a conservative or a Republican per se; this is "our crowd," a fix-mechanism from the interwar period when American politics were really defined. 'Give and take' or adjudicated victory - all they want to do is win, and can readily play offense/defense or liberal/conservative as required.
The problem comes in establishing the framework to perpetuate the victory; the idea is to try and subjugate with a regulatory environment and THAT is what tended to drive Bush into big government. The CRIME is the use of government positions, authority, and ultimately money to do it - were this just a group of people - even very rich people - off on their own in conspiracy it would be much less offensive and perhaps vile but not really threatening to the structure of democracy.

This website does not celebrate Allen who probably has his own clique or circle, but insists Allen has been targeted, very probably for being conservative. His father probably was 'tied' to Nixon or knew him [coached at Whittier after a series of religious schools in the midwest], they shared character traits, and its possible Senator Allen is conservative out of vision or anticipation rather than conviction [Nixon saw a larger conservative movement coming and told Allen to jump on it]. For whatever reason, ultimately his belief structure threatens "our crowd," which needed Reagan but does not see themselves as needing Allen.

What they did was lure Allen passed the tipping point before cutting him off at the knees.
Macaca - "You want me to say what!?!"
'Yeah, we can pin the Democrats on immigration in other districts where we're weak, we need this, help now and we're behind you down the road' - quick serious with the President in an aside after the Tuesday caucus meeting or chummy over lunch, on the phone with Karl Rove, or even via the notorious liar Ken-who-is-head-of-the-RNC. Allen wouldn't have completely trusted that guy speaking on his own though, and would probably have called Rove or the President to confirm on it.
And the President/CIA-fix put the kid in the crowd to begin with so its kind of ipso facto.

The Jewish issue had been raised in 2003 - Allen demanded a retraction from some magazine which they gave him, and if the retraction was at the behest of Bush a guess is that he put them up to running the article in the first place as a precursor. He may not have known when or how he'd use it but that use of it was possible.

The deer head is the fascinating question - one of the other two guys involved died, which is worthy of note in the context of Bush/CIA awareness of the incident. It's been burning a hole in their pockets and they established some basis for tracking the issue - whether they let it sleep or freshened it periodically is the real question. The one guy - now gone public - obviously spilled. The CIA would have preferred to cut an overt deal with him - a little bit of grant money here and there, or opening doors to make life a little easier - but they might not have. Or the guy - if approached - might not have taken the deal. The story - dating from the 1970s - almost certainly is true; the CIA, the media relationship, and the timing reflected in the telling is much more current and newsworthy.

Finally, the 'WHY.' Why advance James Webb - why attack Senator Allen.
1. GENERAL STRATEGY: "our crowd" likes Hillary Clinton, and knocking down Allen does advance McCain in 2008. Be real clear about this though - Bush is in it for himself, and supports Lieberman in Connecticut as a sure thing. Less direct and more adjudicating: Jack Abramoff was a fix designed to protect the CIA gambling franchise, and it's tough to see the attack on Conrad Burns as anything other than Bush-inspired in a reciprocity concept 'trading infiltration of states' - break GOP holds in Montana and Virginia in return for a GOP gain in New Jersey. That latter point is vicious payback for Jon Corzine who took down their CIA-fix Codey, now taking down Corzine's appointment of Bob Menendez with Tom Kean Jr., son of the 9/11 Commissioner.
2. WEBB SPECIFICALLY IS ATTRACTIVE TO THEM:

Serving in the Reagan White House, John Roberts developed a program for warrantless domestic surveillance. It is run out of offices of the State Adjutant General - the Army National Guard - using retired, service, and prior service operatives. It is called HOME GUARD Security, it apparently parallels HOMELAND Security [an intelligence mechanism to support the guarding or prevention function] or in any case the name is very similar, and they have access to the full technology support systems of the United States government.

James Webb served as the first Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs in parallel to John Roberts who was then in the White House [Roberts stepped out as if to 'cape the bull' around Iran-Contra after setting it up with Oliver North and John Poindexter but that is another story].
The National Guard was operational in HOME GUARD Security deployments no later than mid-1985, visible in Connecticut during a relocation between units, in turn raising the possibility Rob Simmons supported CIA murderer Michael Bruce Ross in the eastern part of that state a couple years earlier. Simmons was Army Reserve Military Intelligence [he commanded the unit in New Haven which may relate in some bizarre way to Skull & Bones] and HOME GUARD Security is Army National Guard run by state offices. It is not clear whether those represent entirely separate tracks out of the Pentagon or a pool of available resources - of course Webb would know.
Webb went on to at least be 'peripheral to' if not 'involved with' CIA mechanisms in Hollywood and the media/publishing world.

According to multiple sources, Asa Hutchinson was the United States Attorney in charge of drug smuggling in Arkansas when Bill Clinton was governor and Hillary Clinton was laundering the money through a funding structure which included bonds and the Rose Law Firm, Hutchinson going on to serve in the House of Representatives and the Department of HOMELAND SECURITY before running for governor of the state [current].

William Barr was the CIA executive in charge of the drug smuggling which Terry Reed claims included Oliver North and [Air Force general] Richard Secord; that smuggling had a parallel 'administrative' infrastructure. It probably is possible to back track drug saturation through that administrative structure, in turn that implies there was another executive commensurate to Barr who has not yet been identified. Barr went on to be attorney general which is what makes him conspicuous [Roberts may have been solicitor general at the time] before work in telecommunications radiating the ghetto [from the mid-1990s during the Clinton administration] to diminish the crime bubble and death curve resulting from the drug smuggling. The 'inside' executive probably had the contact with Webb.

IMPORTANT: 'CLOVERLEAF' is the designator for spraying chemicals over cities and definitely over Northern Virginia - we do not know what the designator is for radiating them.

PRECLUSIONARY issue: There are two cross-linkages of relationships which either incriminate Webb or serve to advance him in "our crowd," whichever way you want to look at it.
Roberts-Webb in HOME GUARD Security mechanisms or 'the structure' of warrantless surveillance, and
Webb-Hutchinson-Barr with Clinton and a few others advancing 'deployments' in warrantless surveillance.

Either of those points should be PRECLUSIONARY - together, in fact they ARE preclusionary. You can sit Webb in the chair, but you can't fool the Europeans or Jews [the latter of whom may LIKE and endorse Webb but the corruption is and will be known].

PRO-REAGAN, anti-North/Webb viewing Iran-Contra as a George H.W. Bush 'Quisling' or 'semi-tough' mechanism for attacking a true cold warrior. George H.W. Bush was a 'hero' fighter pilot [with talk to the effect that he really wasn't but for the sake of the argument here assuming he was] while Reagan was never in the Army beyond Hollywood. End of the day, one was tough - and the other wasn't, but the really dramatic point is that one had a vision for freedom while the other never wanted to see beyond a 'CIA fix' with himself as a strong voice in "our crowd" but not really responsible for anything. One way of looking at it: our nation is stuck in this rut over George H.W. Bush's relationship with his father [apparently Geo. H.W. is very nonconfrontational] - certainly to the extent that it has impacted his son Geo. W - but really it equates to duplicity at least apart from their family life.

Webb supposedly went to Annapolis with Oliver North; both were certainly Marines. Both were also very likely operational in Iran-Contra [North conspicuously]. A number of articles have discussed arms shipments in that era beyond just the Contras - some by submarine - and a few articles have noted transactions involving weapons swaps for drugs [citations pending here - at issue in the original search was expanding the concept of 'the Mafia' passed Sicilian or Italian heritage].
Affiliation with North may not be a negative in Northern Virginia [footnote: North was once 'conceptually attacked' - people 'talked trash' on him - in a way which generally suggested at the time he supported our position on the need for political reform]; at the same time we would have anticipated North supporting Allen, particularly is-so-far as Webb is evidently CIA-fixed.

A question is whether Senator Obama and the other Democratic candidates of 2008 - if there are any - realizes how far Webb has gone down the surveillance trail in establishment of the HOME GUARD Security paradigm. Hold on to this photo - it may be a haunting one.

FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU - FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON SENATOR ALLEN. You can poke him, and you can poke him hard. Gaming took down Ryan in Chicago when Allen was running the broader Republican senate effort. Obviously, the "our crowd" paradigm travels with infrastructure - not to claim they're totally unified or have some magic trick for avoiding cliques and factions, in general one hand washes the other. A guess is Bush let the media bring the Ryan situation forward. Controversial, those 'who've known the ropes' are pretty sure he gave it a green light - advancing Senator Obama. Better man may have won - just that Bush was in on taking down Ryan, and Allen had a front row seat. If he's an idiot - for then supporting Roberts as the Supreme Court nominee for example - he shouldn't be in the Senate.

AHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhh!?!. What's he gone and done now? Conservative pundit Laura Ingraham has been wrapped in CIA cover since Eastbury School in the old days.

And SOMEBODY close to the Allen campaign invited her to speak at one of their events. An important - and unrecognized - aspect of the Vietnam War was 'the corrupting of Laos' for no good strategic reason but just to diminish them which the CIA did over about a decade. They will try to leverage Laura at the event and it won't be remotely clear what their objective is; that they have something going on will be a certainty.

What else - where else are they cooking it[?].

hillaryfixedit.blogspot.com [menu to the right] briefly examines the New York race; 'the lost page of notes' resulting in 32 seconds of silence in Pirro's announcement speech [covered live on television], and 'partnered-in-crime Bernie Kerik,' emphasizing the most important outcome of Pirro's dwarf candidacy was keeping other contenders - Richard Nixon's son-in-law Ed Cox - out of the race.

Your awareness is very much appreciated - pass it on.