Bad Fed. Geithner Boy Wonder sours in CIA-orchestrated 'hasty' reporting to Congress; Henry Paulson undertook blatant trickery and this is not going the right way. Is Congress really so hard to work with? Barney Frank and Chris Dodd; do they understand this is a private organization?

And, insofar as we are lending directly from our Treasury, is 'the Fed' now essentially redundant beyond clearing paper checks? What are they doing? Assigning - hugely increasing - the regulatory power of the Fed, as an ultimate Bush-era 'privatization'? Undertaken by a couple of Democrats?

Oh, how they still kiss his ass.



The British deserved to lose an empire and their world influence [it is still alive and well but now gone covert under the table, cheapened in deregulated banking as they prostitute themselves and their history and way of life to the Jews]; Lady Astor marked the Crown Prince Francis Ferdinand for death at Cliveden in something like 1910 or '12. The Revolutionary War was not entirely lost and in theory we might have briefly been secretly gleeful; they let a divorced American woman draw the curtains on their heritage at a garden party.

The plaque is to Wilson who was an idiot trapped in the same scam; the problem with gleeful is that our president promptly dropped his drawers and bent over for 'the fix' and a war view which destroyed Europe unproductively, diminished once proud 'equal' international and trading partners - Brazil, and ultimately screwed us in headlong flight through a narrowing economic tunnel lacking clear and obvious exit strategies.

Just 'say no' to the bailout. Well, they've never 'said no' before; indeed, we hastened in pursuit of the game but in our defense we were sold on the concept of a win-win outcome when nothing could be further from the truth in the hearts of the essentially Satanic manipulators.


When they tried to force it on Ben Strong he wouldn't take the job, 'till a couple of the inside boys took him out of town for a weekend and put it to him one way or the other. Paul Warburg was one of them, and in all seriousness we don't know what they said.
All we know for sure is that Ben Strong ran the Federal Reserve, reconstituted English currency and stabilized the European markets following 'the Great War' [World War I] without much thought for our own unemployed at home, and then, right before the Depression hit, died. In 1928. Proving in the end that he was still at heart a fundamentally good man, and that Alfred Sloan and DuPont and the whole leadership gang - Rockefeller was supposedly in on it - who took down [William Crapo] Durant at General Motors were just slime fixers and manipulators.

Did they kill him?
Did they kill Vance the weekend Bush choked on the pretzel, blacked out, and hit his head on the coffee table?
Proxmire as the Patriot Act extension was being voted in the Senate, after hustling him out of town right before 911?

J. Edgar Hoover totally exonerated; he saw all the games they were playing.
Which three presidents are not buried in the United States?
My guess is Lincoln, Kennedy, and either Grant or Woodrow Wilson; of course if its Wilson the soon-to-be-named director of the FBI wins big. On top of Warren G. Harding joining the Ku Klux Klan in a secret White House ceremony before conceptually 'dying in 1923' when in reality he probably didn't?
Are you kidding?
Before the orchestrated 'Great Depression [I]'.
Hoover stands as a giant surrounded by little kids and swine.


A statue of 'Earth', apparently before or anyway in the very early stages of the 'extraction paradigm' they have used to rape her. "Bend over Mother Earth! Zionists are bent on manipulation!"

Of course the Federal Reserve is a funding mechanism for Israel. They had the cash flow before they had the country.


Unwitting cop stands out front as cover for 'the era of the great racketeering' which was just then getting underway.


The War Department and the State Department used to fit together under one roof, in the dull days before America's 'ruling elite' decided we wanted to takeover the enslavement of Africa through a bribe sheet empowering a thin band of technocrats and bureaucracy figures who educate their children in foreign countries and mouth the proper buzz words. Heck; this was back in the heady era after we'd knocked the good guys out of Cuba [Spain? By then? Benevolent. Maybe not originally, but by then] but before we used Castro as a CIA device to serve as a conceptual 'dagger at the throat' in a fixed theater piece unfolding across decades with the island people essentially enslaved.


And our military was still jaunty with a Jeep and a Colt .45; four-deuce mortar rather than today's android sunglasses and Nazi helmet and targeting our own guys for death. Or having their legs blown off; crippled Navy SEAL Lt. Commander with his legs blown off in Iraq in March 200[6], discharged June of the same year, sleeping in a battery operated electric wheelchair outside the Verizon Center in downtown Washington D.C.

The picture is really pre-Jeep which only came with the War [WWII] but look at the tank on the truck. Almost jaunty. Make it lighter, stronger, with heavier weapons, more power and a radio... it had promise, but didn't ever make it on a widespread basis. In the end the Jeep as a scout vehicle for fleets of utility Sherman tanks is what carried the war for us... wasn't it? Bazooka? Just damn jaunty. Heat the soup in your steel pot; that is basic infantry. Candy for the little kids, and don't let 'em be spying for the bad guys.

The same does not hold true for everybody, though. Crap out the Joint Strike Fighter. Put it out of its misery. Buy up F-22s, and break out the JSF as different planes in its multiple roles rather than accepting a CIA gimp design. F4 Phantom was the last true multi-role plane we deployed, and we should leave the concept there. The Communists used to beat us up over North Vietnam; it was simply an inadequate airplane. Now you want to revisit the issue, ADDING a vertical takeoff and landing requirement? Get out of town. Put the beast out of its misery.

AND tell the CIA to stop larding up F22 costs. I bet they're trying to make it unattractive by using it as a funding mechanism. Swine.


I don't know if all this gear was meant to be on the single heavy truck in wartime and that confuses the picture. Truck as a rolling fortress? The cannon itself looks... small. But to be charitable, light by cannon standards and mobile. Maybe as a niche weapon [a helicopter can drop in heavier cannon, but do they resupply ammo by helicopter or truck? Pallet by helicopter, but I bet they burn through it pretty quick].
A problem today is all the contractors seeing an ongoing revenue stream in 'smart weapons' that destroy themselves on impact to the tune of twelve million dollars a pop, supported by our military training to 'step on sparks' rather than securing the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Facilitated by riding in helicopters for ten-month tours in-country as opposed to walking out and marrying a local.

What are you going to leave the Afghans with? Smart weapons or cannons [that we ourselves don't use]. Any thoughts on bringing back the four deuce mortar? Do we want to create an Afghan army that 'hits and runs' like we do, or are we expecting them to stay and fight?


Different view of the same cannon. Contractors looking for money. Eisenhower and Marshal were reconfiguring the Army right about in this time-period for the coming struggle; Long Johns and self propelled 155mm tubes at the end, did we go in with adequate cannons at the start? How long have we been in Afghanistan - eight years? No rush.

A public service blogspot hoping to start conversations if not reach decisions. Poor bastards don't see the full picture; State Department and the Federal Reserve call the war shots I bet. What can you do? Choke down on the CIA interacting with your command, and make them play an honest game. Oppose the Swine.